Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "How many troops can Russia really mobilize?" video.

  1. He’s literally quoting the defense minister…how can it be 0 research?
    22
  2. What? There are no British or US military combat troops, all there is the foreign legion unit at 20,000 strong
    21
  3. Tell me you don’t know how militaries work without saying it
    12
  4. Prove it lol
    11
  5. That’s not how mobilization works, they may have been called, but they’re not deployable (effectively)
    10
  6. No, they’re not lol
    10
  7. Binkov on Monday: “we’re gonna take a week off cuz we need a break.” President Putin: Cackles
    8
  8.  @slackerman4161  the war crimes bit? War of aggression? Massacres? Raping of civilians? Looting? Executions of civilians? Executions of POWs? Attempting to destroy an active nuclear power plant and destroy the local environment?
    7
  9. Fucking what?! ‘Muh west bad!’ Because the west told Russia to invade Ukraine, obviously
    7
  10. Knowing how to do the shooty bang bang doesn’t mean a sailor or airman knows how to conduct infantry tactics
    5
  11. Where lol, prove it
    4
  12. Because Russia to this point was only using its professional soldiers (about 195,000 or so), PMCs (not many, some 10,000 at most) and Donbas militia (poorly trained, starting numbers of some 40,000, 100-150,000 have been mobilized reportedly, not a lot of clarity there) meanwhile Ukraine went into full war mobilization of some 2-3% of its population and is under martial law
    4
  13. Uh…if you believe propaganda at face value then you’re stupid
    3
  14. The US wouldn’t, even if you were in a crunch it’d be 4 months at minimum, closer to 6 for any form of speciality training
    3
  15. Binkov is Croat, not a Russian This stupid ‘Binkov is Russian! Biased!’ Line has been bitch slapped thousands of times in these comment sections
    3
  16. How about you head to donbass and grab an AK I give you 1 week if you start in winter
    2
  17. It was about the first mobilization run dude, how was it supposed to age then?
    2
  18.  @swaminathanbalakrishnan1399  propaganda is usually very detailed, doesn’t make it true, whataboutism isn’t an argument by the way, so don’t say it, we aren’t talking about their propaganda, we’re talking about his
    2
  19. Bigger question for me is equipment provision, lots of reports of inadequate or poorly maintained equipment even less than 24 hours before those units went in country, what equipment will these reservists have to hand? Donbas militias are already supported by 122mm artillery for one example, I don’t even think a single professional Russian unit used 122s prewar
    2
  20. Because the inflation isn’t bad enough lol
    2
  21. This wasn’t a pre planned video judging by the community posts, easier to just use stock footage and narrate
    2
  22.  @milchomarkov8158  ethnic displacement
    1
  23. What a stupid analogy not based in reality, but let’s entertain it slightly and destroy it with one plot hole If Northern Ireland wanted to leave this new fangled UK, they wouldn’t need Irish military sneaking into Northern Ireland under disguise that Ireland later admits it did to do it, they’d just hold a peaceful referendum from the start, like Scotland has been doing for centuries There, easy
    1
  24.  @TheIT221  don’t feed him, look at his stupid arguments don’t play into his narrative
    1
  25. Big difference, Balkans never had nuclear weapons, let’s hope not
    1
  26. So Russia is losing some of the conquered territory, ergo Russia is losing territory?
    1
  27.  @farright118  with what trainers? Most were sent in country
    1
  28.  @TheGetout04  so the Germans taking those thousands of square kilometers prior was just what? Imagination?
    1
  29. Yeah they lost a lot in the last 800 years haven’t they…
    1
  30. Don’t be so sure, the Ukrainians aren’t sitting pretty at the moment, losses especially in equipment have been devastating, and shortages are exacerbating the losses with just useless equipment because there’s nothing to give it
    1
  31.  @TheMatti36  that’s great but Ukrainian forces are still mostly armed with soviet era weapons and their own home grown stuff
    1
  32. Because the armies of 1914 had limited conscription that wasn’t separate from true military service minus colonial deployments, and their militaries were much, much larger than today, in terms of manpower, and more of the army proportionally was infantry, compared to today
    1
  33.  @luckyxnero  ah yes, the forced WW2 historical parallelism that lacks all context Spoiler alert, the US ended the war with superior tech to all its adversaries Tech has been beating numbers as shown in the artillery war in 2022 as Western artillery have been crushing Russian artillery, and enabled the liberation of Kherson specifically
    1
  34.  @chriss9187  There are no US or British military combat troops Learn to fucking read
    1
  35.  @andraslibal  source: trust me bro Quit liking your own comments it makes you look like a tool
    1
  36.  @moorewr  no one who knows anything is asking that, the Ukrainians aren’t stupid
    1
  37.  @Caesarfuckinplays  how’s that worked out?
    1
  38.  @jloiben12  it’s not ‘cope’ it’s just dumb
    1
  39.  @baraxor  that’s not a fair comparison
    1
  40.  @baraxor  Russia isn’t facing 35 nations including the worlds best military after nearly a decade of war It’s not a fair comparison
    1
  41.  @Kristof1  you dummy, bots don’t think they’re preprogrammed
    1