Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "What would WW1 have looked like had the US joined the Central powers in 1917?" video.

  1. “The entrance of the United States caused many reactions, it caused the French to realize they would win after all and demand stricter terms for peace, it caused the British to realize that the war must end in 1918 before the Americans dominated the globe, and the Germans realized they must ship as many divisions to the west before too many Americans arrive”
    290
  2.  @yaz2928  why don’t you go read the accredited historical work by the accredited author, then come back to me with that yeah?
    83
  3.  @onehope6448  it doesn’t matter if you agree that’s how they felt Germany by the way wasn’t the only one with mutinies, as even said in this video There’s a reason that the losses in this war shaped interwar French politics for the entirety until Mr Mustache started making himself felt, the French economy was nearly collapsed by the war, they were barely holding on against Germany with British help, while their enemy had a second front I don’t know what kinda revisionist view you have but I’m sorry it’s not true
    62
  4.  @onehope6448  my guy, human emotions and public conscious isn’t something that needs to make sense to you, how it be is how it be
    28
  5.  @yaz2928  someone didn’t read the main comment, the one by the whole accredited historian with sources n such
    4
  6. The Great (Comment) War
    2
  7. No one knows exactly where it came from, some say Kansas, others say a field hospital in France, another could say China We don’t know
    2
  8.  @greg_mca  they were so terrible the Germans tried to get shotguns banned xD
    2
  9.  @rakisuzuki-burke4148  he was out of the fighting for many months after his gas injuries and temporary blindness
    2
  10.  @catmonarchist8920  morons online don’t realize a basic tenet of logistics is you consume more supplies in an attack than in a defense
    1
  11. No
    1
  12.  @HolyPastrami  the presence of the Philippines gave FDR (who frankly isn’t likely to be in power as the political history would be very different) the space to declare all nations in the south East Asian area to be under US protection, if a hypothetical oil embargo happens again, Japan wouldn’t give a fuck about fighting the USA as what are they gonna do without a presence in the western pacific? Nothing, so they’d just southern plan the British and Dutch (again)
    1
  13.  @HolyPastrami  that is a completely discussion reliant point, does the US keep the Philippines in a central power US world against Japan You must not know the real history, FDR literally said all nations in SEA were under US protection, hence the whole Pearl Harbor thing, no realistically they couldn’t
    1
  14.  @HolyPastrami  the video shows the US would lose their pacific holdings, it’s not an if
    1
  15.  @HolyPastrami  it’s the lynchpin to the discussion, historically FDR declared that all nations in SEA were under US protection, as the Philippines gave him this There is no arguing this, this is a historical fact, so as math always goes if 2+1+3=6 and you remove the 3 then it’s not gonna equal 6 just because the 2 and 1 are still there
    1
  16.  @HolyPastrami  what a stupid attempt to use my argument, no You’re saying that even with new variables, it still has the same outcome, you’re stupid and ignorant of basic logic
    1
  17. A war 2 years in is nigh impossible to accurately predict, and you’re asking to see the post war political effects of a defeated (potentially) France? A dethroned Britain? A massively powerful Japan? A still maybe kneecapped German empire? 20 years of American politics alone are nigh impossible to predict It would be, impossible
    1
  18. Probably the biggest error in the hypothesis, more likely is the Germans attempting to take a Finnish/Russian port for American supplies, not soldiers, so they could finally eat again
    1