Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "What would a total nuclear war between China and the US look like?" video.

  1.  @samueljr.2026  there was also a treaty on naval tonnage displacements before WW2 That shit was thrown out in five seconds
    30
  2.  @bobsink624  not even necessarily, the EU can still kick the shit out of Russia unless they want an ash ridden Europe, which they don’t, but they will be the military powerhouse, but the Indians would be the economic powerhouse assuming America is somehow economically ruined Which wouldn’t happen as shown
    13
  3.  @mxn1948  still, probably shouldn’t give people ideas Public outcry has led to things that the politicians didn’t want, like the Spanish American War
    11
  4.  @ommsterlitz1805  lol And they just have the 10,000 ICBMs to launch them too, right? Fuck off
    6
  5.  @VisibilityFoggy  No, you misunderstand, increased pressure to go to war is um Not wanted
    5
  6. Only if Russia and America have a nuclear duel, there’s no other nation that can stand up to either of them on the nuclear side, in every other case, Russia/America wins against any nuclear weapon state China likely has the third largest warhead supply, and they aren’t getting much here as shown, France? The UK? Israel? They’re not gonna be able to do much against America/Russia Yes casualties, but the Russian/American nation states will still exist, unlike their opponent
    4
  7. @John Smith 1. I never said anything about Pakistan 2. What are you smoking? Who mentioned 100,000 nukes? No one has 100,000 nukes 3. This isn’t a bio weapon showdown it’s a nuclear showdown
    4
  8. You can’t underestimate a number, they have 270-300 nuclear warheads, so that’s the maximum they could do What’s the under estimation? What, they got a gajillion nukes or something that only the randoms online know about?
    3
  9. Lol what? Even the worlds total warhead count wouldn’t end humanity, not even close
    2
  10.  @neworder736  neither I’m a rational human being, do the freaking math based on mortal blast radius warhead count and total earth land coverage
    2
  11.  @neworder736  uh, america is cool and is rather against the whole tyranny thing…but I mean don’t overblow it guy
    2
  12. Hardly, even the Soviet Union and America didn’t go to nuclear war without technical mishaps, the Chinese aren’t stupid (sadly) they know a nuclear exchange will turn their nation to ash, and even still the Americans would have enough nuclear weapons for Russia if it got any ideas, but it would be best advised to not while still being mostly stable in probably 80% of the entire nation.
    2
  13. No, the two big boys just nuke everyone Why START is important, as long as no one is breaking it, which they aren’t it would seem, no one could blow up everyone
    2
  14. No shit, but it’s important to know where it happens and how
    1
  15.  @ls200076  it wouldn’t be a pleasant experience but an exchange of say 750-800 warheads on two very specific landmasses, while america is home to one of the two bread baskets of the world it’s unlikely it would be significantly damaged with China having much more important things to nuke
    1
  16.  @plaguedoc7727  Ha! No The total warhead count is currently not enough to even remotely try ending humanity, the ecological results would be more of a threat to humanity than nuclear weapons themselves Also just a quick reminder not all of the worlds ~15,000 warheads are deployed, many hundreds in Russia and America are awaiting dismantling, the British are lowering their warhead count by 30, and stuff like the crap DPRK nukes are mostly Hiroshima power bombs, which suck
    1
  17. No, not in America, nuclear winter requires much more nukes in a much more condensed area, China yeah, maybe, depends on warhead count
    1
  18.  @Orneyrocks1609  a giant lol is all that can be said in response to this, there’s so much wrong here
    1
  19.  @r.p5380  there’s literally two videos showing how this is blatantly untrue on this channel, go watch them yeah? Also you can’t accuse anyone of propaganda when you make such erroneous and hyperbolic statements like “Germany is the largest EU military power” “Germany only had 4 fighter jets one time” (which yeah no shit they started at 0 like everyone else?) You my friend are drinking the koolaid hard, or you’re just a Russian bot, assuming the former like it’s not that hard dude, watch the two videos and try not to Russian bias yourself into the comments
    1
  20.  @r.p5380  there’s already a video, two actually, about this on this channel
    1
  21.  @AeneasGemini  L. O. L. Go watch the videos on this Channel guy then come back and say that
    1
  22.  @FarisMoringstar  imagine calling the gulf war and the Russian intervention in Syria ethnic genocide That’s fucking stupid, you should not be taken seriously
    1
  23. Too bad no one took him up on his wisdom
    1
  24.  @bleung2274  there’s a lot wrong here First there is no precedent for how people act when nuclear war happens because nuclear war hasn’t happened Second China has no purpose in nuking many of its neighbors Third China does not have the nukes to flatten all of its neighbors as suggested, there’s a misconception that mutually assured destruction applies to every nuclear power, this isn’t true, only america and Russia can turn each other into glass, China cannot and certainly not so with multiple nations Fourth these nations are economically dependent on China, and this only is growing, it’s like America nuking Canada like okay, congrats you lost a major trade partner Fifth 300~ warheads will not irradiate an entire continent, it’s not even enough to irradiate the whole of China itself, certain nations like South Korea and Japan, yes most probably, all of China’s neighbors? Definitely not irradiated I don’t think you fully understand the subject
    1