Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "Китай против России (2017)" video.

  1. Anyone who knows actual military history: laughs at this comment China wouldn’t walk in one line towards a target with undisciplined forces China wouldn’t have horse drawn gear and doesn’t suffer a lack of motorization and poor logistics with 1 billion vehicle variants
    19
  2. “Russia has reserved the right for a nuclear response to a non nuclear threat to the existence of the state” -US assessment of Russia, 2017
    18
  3.  @rmichels05  thats a good question, as US would support Russia the European Union would support China more than likely Hm
    9
  4. 6000 nukes aren’t deployed, thank you for telling everyone you don’t know what you’re talking about Also it would only take 350 warheads to depopulate 60-80% of Russia
    9
  5. Those nukes would suck, but China would nuke back and oh yeah they still capture the Far East, and those wouldn’t be nuked by China
    5
  6.  @maryukaiwe5051  boy this aged like milk
    5
  7. Oh boy I’m back to this old video! Time to reread all those comments saying 1 Russian is worth 10 Chinese and that the Russian Air Force could delete the Chinese navy in a day! God that last one was so stupid
    4
  8. Heaters and Jackets: “You underestimate my power!”
    4
  9. Yeah that was the final conclusion without recent events, everyone with two brain cells (which is somewhat rare on comment sections featuring Russia prior to Feb 24 2022 cuz Russian cocksucking) could tell you Russia couldn’t stand against any mid tier power, let alone a superpower
    3
  10. As much as Russia is a threat to world peace, or I guess European peace, the world should be very afraid if the Chinese would win against the Russians, China is a global threat, I hope this happens, and Russia receives help
    3
  11. Why update it? Conclusion is still valid
    2
  12. Stupid, go read history first beyond the results page
    2
  13.  @baxxx20  winter wasn’t issue in 1941, hence why it wasn’t a problem post 1942, the Germans were still in their Summers during all of 1941 because dumbass OKW
    2
  14.  @zacthegamer6145  I think the commenter means the only youtuber
    2
  15.  @Linki8uu  that wasn’t mentioned in what I read, and doesn’t make any sense frankly, Russia uses nuclear deterrence, not nuclear threats, for the most part, which to be frank isnt too surprising given what happened the last time they were invaded I’m not saying your wrong but it doesn’t line up logically or appear anywhere I’ve seen
    2
  16. In three days the most important lifeline of Russia, the tran Siberian railroad, would be cut Considering how much of Russian defense sector relies on western imports…that’s a problem
    2
  17.  @nighhemperor  China has already succeeded there
    2
  18.  @user-fn7gi7cp7f  and the fact that it would be nigh impossible to hide the build up
    2
  19. China has much more resources than Germany, and facing less soldiers with more soldiers than back then, with superior numbers and quality even more than the Germans
    2
  20. Lack of modern air to air missiles
    2
  21.  @Melvorgazh  fearsome? Not for the most modern air forces, it’s still a capable platform especially its more modernized variants but therein is the issue, it’s really old with weak modernization attempts compared to say F15/F16 modernization And again Russia as said lacks modern weapons to arm them with, hence the weaker score
    2
  22. Based on what? Internet conjecture?
    2
  23. Chinese nuclear stockpile is not 600, but yes you and the video are correct, the Russian Far East has little chance of survival
    2
  24. You forget that there’s a solid 7-10 brigades in the East while the Chinese have 50+ within a few days travel Also the transsiberian railroad is very easy to cut for eastern nations, as history showed
    2
  25.  @chrishanson8306  badly trained? Hardly, and are we forgetting the border conflicts with places like India? While Russia does have more combat experience, it’s worth noting this time in history when Japan war gamed Pearl Harbor attack twice and both times was rather unsuccessful with lots of losses Not so in reality And uh…again, the Russians have nothing, everything you said is irrelevant anyway, there’s still 10x the number of soldiers, dozens times heavy hardware, 10-1 Airforce presence, closer logistics, a bigger more potent navy, you’re just a Russian shill honestly, the Chinese have the upper hand
    2
  26. Boy someone’s naive Allies don’t keep significant military assets at the border with their ‘friends’
    2
  27. “China conducted a division level exercise in which it postulated moving a division sized element 1500km over desert and mountainous terrain, now if you’re russia looking at this, where in the world can China move a division over such terrain and distance? Right, Kamchatka, it’s best not to forget the sino-russian border has a massive amount of army units on both sides of it”
    2
  28. Russia, if they had to choose China is a civilizational threat, Russia is mostly a crisis melting pot
    2
  29. No Allies! All other countries neutral and impassable! Reading is hard
    1
  30.  @Mocsk  I don’t know what he said but lend lease was the lifeline that saved the soviet economy
    1
  31.  @Mocsk  no you didn’t fix it, you’re just a fanboy
    1
  32.  @ivartangring3392  Russian military power wasn’t really overrated because of the war, it was and is long overrated for whatever reason, the war didn’t do anything except remind people of reality and of course everyone is too stupid to understand the Russian lack of morale
    1
  33. Boy is that why China is trying to decouple the US from EU, so it can keep trading with EU? Hear me out, if all of Europe is enemy of China, that’s a pretty dumb move on china’s part to keep investing in Europe
    1
  34.  @ajdnxjwkwmdnsja  the only joke in this comment thread is you
    1
  35. Because their slave labor was used by the west to make the modern age, so they got rich decades ago, and built themselves up into a superpower
    1
  36. “More experience”? Based on what?
    1
  37.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  these are hardly wars against anything besides insurgents, it’s like saying the US experience in Afghanistan is sufficient experience for fighting peer opponents like Russia and China, and if the United States realizes it’s a mistake, then fuck knows how the Russians justify that thinking (if they do, which they probably don’t)
    1
  38.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  what? Are you saying fighting the Finns or poles in 1940 is equivalent to fighting terrorists? You’re hopeless
    1
  39. Hahahahahahhaha https://youtu.be/AGafVj-wrmw No
    1
  40. Nah it’d be Belgium, Poland was enemies against both sides who were allies Belgium was just kinda the place to fight in
    1
  41. Lol
    1
  42. No
    1
  43. ??????? Because modern naval warships (especially those….anti missile ships) have never thought about shooting enemy missiles or something
    1
  44.  @caltonfollows2168  the entire navy wouldn’t be sunk in a week you dolt
    1
  45. Politically unrealistic, but would be entertaining
    1
  46. Well, yeah How would war with India be waged? Not with massive mechanized units, theres this problem of the largest mountain chain between them, in an area of China that is horrendously undeveloped
    1
  47. Yup, the railway is too weak to support major eastern offensive wars
    1
  48. Caspian Report: “did I miss anything important?”
    1
  49. Go on the website to suggest stuff
    1
  50. Okay Kiyoshi
    1
  51. Genghis: ”How many times do we need to teach you this lesson, old man?!”
    1
  52.  @eurtz876  everyone today overhypes Russia as a military at any point in history and it’s stupid But I’m glad to be able to giggle at those morons today
    1
  53. No allies! All other nations impassable! reading is hard
    1
  54. They may have more combat experience for select units, but they’re still gonna be destroyed by the sheer disparity of numbers of troops and quality/quantity of equipment
    1
  55.  @fvllgrey  So those Russian winter pushes and counter attacks by the Germans in 1914-1917 (oh yeah they won that war) and 1941-1944 were…what exactly? Fake? That’s just those two wars, also Russia doesn’t have more active artillery, they have 20,000 guns rusting away in graveyards, but those are hardly service worthy
    1
  56. Napeolon era Switzerland >:3
    1
  57. It’s not MAD, the Chinese nuclear Arsenal isn’t capable of doing so MAD only applies to Russia and America in a Russo American conflict, no one else
    1
  58. There are no biases, oops
    1
  59. Russians aren’t known for bending over, there’d be a fight, despite the obvious outcome
    1
  60. Lol, no, there’s no basis for that, and frankly infantry aren’t the ones doing the spearhead, the tanks are, and tanks don’t care about nonsensical baseless internet crap
    1
  61. You say these things yet you forget this problem where China will drop something like 750,000 men on the front where the Russians could scramble, maybe 250,000 after the losses in the east
    1
  62.  @sarcasmal5744  overrated
    1
  63.  @wanruzhao4229  lol, China would decimate Russia
    1
  64.  @soldier-01der  maybe so but the Chinese would still have numbers, tech, supply, space, air superiority, armor, etc advantages, experience isn’t that necessary with such advantages
    1
  65. The Russians would nuke them
    1
  66. Are you dumb? There’s literally a screen that shows unit positions, they’ve something like 4 divisions worth in the Manchuria region, with a division on the border proper
    1
  67.  @Goorood  no
    1
  68. He already did Hungary Romania
    1
  69.  @AFT_05G  lol the Russians would nuke everything, you know little about Russia if you believe that
    1
  70. When was this?
    1
  71. First: not a tactic, dummy Second: how the hell does that happen? SPOILERS it doesn’t
    1
  72. UB variants are trainers without radar
    1
  73. Also dogfights don’t happen at knife fight ranges
    1
  74.  @shintopriestesskikyou5674  yeah dude...that’s what supporting one would do...take advantage of the situation, wow the armchair general strikes again with another stupid operation
    1
  75.  @hellenialori5466  why don’t they stand up to them now and stop cooperating with them like us wants? Europe as always is doing dumb
    1
  76.  @deleted_user8517  anyone who says that should be laughed at
    1
  77. Friendly reminder, not all of US or Russian nukes are in active force, a couple thousand aren’t deployed or are awaiting dismantlement
    1
  78. Chinese and US ASAT weapons vs shields I suppose
    1
  79. How would Russia fight india? W h a t?
    1
  80. Against a nation with a backwards army doctrine, but okay Also you must forget the time the Russians got their shit pushed in counterattacking the Japanese, they still won, but at horrible cost, good luck sustaining that without numerical superiority
    1
  81. No, it’s all about nuclear weapons
    1
  82.  @sami3566  are you willing to risk hundreds of millions of lives testing that theory?
    1
  83. How do you lose the pacific lifeline and call it a draw? Bruh
    1
  84. They’d block the malacca strait on day one with the 0 naval assets they have anywhere nearby against the worlds second largest navy Uh huh
    1
  85.  @grisall  they can’t occupy it, especially when uh China is closer
    1
  86.  @grisall  “you don’t get it do you, strawnerd?” How the hell would they do it? No Russian is there, no one would be there, no one can be there, the Chinese can be there, see the problem?
    1
  87.  @grisall  and read a map to see why it wouldn’t work
    1
  88.  @Melvorgazh  of course, old stuff is weaker than new stuff, it happens
    1
  89.  @Melvorgazh  ? The F35…weaker than Mig21?! That has to be the most nonsensical thing I’ve heard in a while
    1
  90. 3 million paramilitary in the mountains would like to have a word about that
    1
  91. China wasn’t a military power of any kind then China now…well watch the video
    1
  92.  @user-ie5eb9bt4v  so how was the Cold War a conflict of superpowers? (It was)
    1
  93. Cool! That doesn’t change the fact China would rip a quarter of Russian territory away from it
    1
  94.  @queenelizabeth5289  l o l
    1
  95. They’re not cuz YouTube is blocked by China, it’s just the bots that they employ xD
    1
  96. Lol “just fly in and destroy one building and we win” as if they’d get close
    1
  97. Uh yeah, numbers, tech, industry, force disposition, cutting off the trans Siberian railroad, what does russia have in its favor? Nothing
    1
  98. It’s not an opinion it’s a statement of fact, and it’s wrong, based on what would Russia win? Their Air Force, army, and navy is inferior to Chinese might, and even worse as it’s mostly in the wrong spot to fight China
    1
  99.  @againstviralmisinformation510  the us doesn’t place forces ready to go against Canada like vice versa with the eastern nation, simul Canadian military isn’t built to attack or defend from America China meanwhile holds more troops on its border with Russia than it does with Vietnam (not exactly a mean feat) and conducts many ‘these are for war with Russia’ exercises
    1
  100.  @moyeenm.bhuiyan6249  ‘possess’ means fuck all in a conflict where seconds matter bucko, also many warheads are tactical air delivered weapons which aren’t deployed east, just watch the fucking US vs China nuclear showdown video for that, and then realize the U.S. are more dangerous nuclear opponents than Russia, which is important to remember when the U.S. Russia video ended with 65-80% of Russians dead, sure the Chinese have less warheads but not as many less deployed than america and they’d capture the Russian Far East, saving quite a bit
    1
  101.  @shivamsolanke4660  lol
    1
  102. With their 4 divisions against the Chinese 10 divisions with air superiority? How? China is there in the borderlands, Russia frankly isn’t, they wouldn’t either be able to push into Chinese military from the west, Gobi desert isn’t very hospitable, Silk Road is narrow
    1
  103. Historically illiterate Idiot China would suffer 0 of the logistical problems they suffered, like oh I don’t know, the horse drawn supplies with 900,000 different types of equipment
    1
  104. I don’t think the border regions are so forgiving for defenders in the Sino-Russian border
    1
  105. They had a strategic defense conference just recently
    1
  106. More than likely, Russia is belligerent, but China is evil, but it’s more likely to be who isn’t responsible for the war, say Russia bombed Beijing unprovoked, they’d support China (maybe)
    1
  107. ?????? Oh no it’s another “muh west bias!” When a nation like the United States has 15x the military with decades of technology and combat experience over most random nations like Venezuela
    1
  108.  @indonesianguy4026  you need to rewatch those vids bub, we’re talking about a 7,000 mile logistical line, a hypothetical 100% RN vs Indian Navy (the most neglected branch in India) and the only way the Greeks win is if it’s a preemptive attack, if and Cyprus is lost anyway if it’s tried
    1
  109. That’s interesting considering it was the USSR’s puppet
    1
  110. 1. Who cares? 2. That’s like saying they’d use artillery or guns, it’s a given 3. And? 4. Who cares, it’s a hypothetical scenario
    1
  111. That all just makes China stronger
    1
  112. https://youtu.be/uQedM3qBXgc
    1