Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "Could the EU military conquer the UK?" video.

  1. You must not have watched the video, the EU wouldn’t have air and naval superiority, they would have air and naval supremacy, this isn’t 1939 guy against 40 German ships, this is modern times against 1000 jet aircraft with only 140 to fight with There is no ‘rampaging’ by the Royal Navy, there is only a desperate attempt to not die in the first week, again you must not have watched the video, the amount of ASW aircraft would again annihilate the few subs the UK has, they’re not going to do fucall guy
    5
  2. Nah because every country in Europe is a bitch who would whine See the French for a perfect example
    2
  3. Spoiler alert! You will
    2
  4.  @iflashbangdogs7676  yeah how dare he engage in discussion? Fuck that weirdo, he has a differing viewpoint to you! How dare he! Inquisition him!
    2
  5. What’s with uk fanboys and pulling the “muh nukes!” Card, like you weirdos did this in the video Us vs Uk as if the US doesn’t have tens of thousands of warheads, comparing to your middling hundred-two hundred And you forget the EU has France, who if you watch the nuclear showdown, France came out ahead in the nuclear exchange, increase the target count by the entirety of not Russia Europe, and your nukes are useless alone dude Do people just assume one nuke turns a nation into ash on its own? Only explanation for this stupidity
    2
  6.  @joethecommunist.1243  your soldiers would be wasted completely if you tried to attack France in this hypothetical, do you fanboys just assume you have an arena war constantly?
    2
  7.  @joethecommunist.1243  you’d have to use planes to try to protect both Great Britain and Ireland islands from being invaded dude, also the whole you’ll be blockaded into starvation part
    2
  8.  @bobthebomb6498  no they wouldn’t attack the uk because it is ally of both, and you must not have read these comments, these aren’t “don’t do it we have nukes you’ll lose a lot” it’s “we will win because we have nukes”, go read some of them they’re absolutely stupid
    2
  9. ”Papa wasn’t no bitch and I ain’t neither!” Apparently the queen in this case is southern US
    2
  10. It’s not even close, it’s not competitive for victory, it’s a desperate fight for survival It’s not who would win it’s could they be conquered in one year?
    2
  11. If we include nukes then the UK dies harder, watch the France vs uK nuclear showdown video, then realize that the targets increase exponentially for Uk while they still only have 200 ish warheads
    1
  12.  @CB-fz3li  more nukes land on you than just the French ones? Combo with the whole more targets you have to attack with same warheads, that wouldn’t have been enough to end France alone?
    1
  13.  @CB-fz3li  in a EU vs Britain? Not even close, assuming Britain tried to nuke the others, maybe the major cities would get one or several since you need several, but, there’s too many targets for Britain to wage effective nuclear war, this isn’t MAD (except the winter bit), there’s not even nukes for either side, that’s why the Russians and Americans keep thousands upon thousands, hundreds aren’t enough
    1
  14.  @housetheunstoppablessed4846  but it’s not supposed to be realistic geopolitics, that’s the whole thing
    1
  15. Not if Ireland is in the fight, even if the UK tries to overrun it you can bet your ass they can’t overrun everywhere that a beachhead/logistics base can be established, especially the urban environments
    1
  16. And the UK the most battle hardened and best trained military on the planet? There’s so much no to that statement it’s asinine, it’s not 1939 guy, even in 1939 the British army got slapped on all fronts, and they’re much better than today’s army, sorry to burst your national bias bubble, but your nation is struggling with knives, war would destroy your nation, especially against such massive odds alone That’s why you need the Americans permission to do anything because they’re actually powerful
    1
  17.  @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-  No you didnt In 1940 you cocked up the defense of Norway, you watched idly as Poland was eaten, you got reamed in France and only survived because the OKW had a dick measuring contest, you got kicked all the way out of Tunisia into Egypt by Rommel, and you got rekt by paratroopers while on an island, you lost the south East Asian colonies to the Japanese, did you win anything? No, the answer is no The British army was as useful as a screen door on a submarine, or uboat in this case You needed the Americans to do fucall, just like today, you might forget that part where you lost your entire armor force in Dunkirk, don’t worry the Americans got you though, just don’t get it twisted, you were support to the Americans, an excellent island jumping point for France and start point for them to begin actually killing the Germans, you didn’t defeat *Shit*, except for the biggest joke of the war, the kriegsmarine, so congratulations, you killed 10 surface ships and some uboats when the Germans ignored their navy for the most part Oh and this isn’t about the army so it’s not really fair but I find it funny, you were the worlds largest navy, until 2 years after the Americans decided they were gonna be the largest navy, I find that funny
    1
  18.  @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-  regardless this isn’t about WW2, I don’t understand people like you who see overwhelming odds with no hope of survival and say things as asinine as “they would lose” like, what? That’s like saying the ant can kill the elephant
    1
  19.  @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-  guy, I didn’t make the video, I can’t delete your comment Besides again this isn’t about WW2 it’s a comparison of today’s soldier to ww2’s and frankly all military’s soldiers are inferior to their WW2 counterparts in terms of ‘existing’, as in who they are, mentally physically etc, they’re certainly better equipped
    1
  20.  @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-  it’s not even a counter argument as it ignores every point I made and brought in at minimum two battles where it was the Americans with British support Battle of the bulge british victory my fucking ass, just cuz they were there doesn’t make it theirs, battle for France wasn’t an Italian victory just cuz they were there
    1
  21.  @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-  let’s get one thing straight that your inability to read missed It’s about the British army, not the navy nor the Air Force, also after 1940 sure you may be the only allied belligerent but literally all of your supplies are US sourced, food, weapons, ammo, vehicles (the most important part) But I’m not gonna keep wasting my time, if a point is reiterated thrice and you still won’t get it or even address it then it’s not worth it Especially when this is irrelevant, I made one sentence comparison, and then you just took it to 11
    1
  22.  @mattia8327  it’s a quote from him, I didn’t say that
    1
  23. “If no one else intervenes”
    1
  24.  @bobthebomb6498  no that’s where my anger comes from, there’s so many people that think the UK could glass the planet when they can’t even glass France
    1
  25.  @bobthebomb6498  because words are scary
    1
  26. Wars aren’t won by one person
    1
  27. Because then every scenario is a world war
    1
  28.  @jutswheezie  who are you why do we care and what even made you say that? “Piss off ya twat”
    1
  29.  @level30boss27  I don’t know it
    1