Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "Is modern Russian Army stuck in time?" video.

  1. Sorry remind me in every single Cold War going hot battle plan what was the basis of battle? The basis was the Soviets would achieve surprise and be on the offensive, ie first strike, but yeah somehow it’s us going to test it, when the Russians are the ones invading their neighbors today…hmmmmmmmmmmmm
    7
  2. Binkov doesn’t have western or Russian bias, considering how no one can prove it and what he says is based in fact “yeah the Russians have the smaller and less technologically advanced Air Force compared to US or China so they’d lose that air war” “MUH BIAS!”
    4
  3.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  ‘neo nazi camp’ lol anything not pro Russia is ‘neo nazi’ to you
    4
  4. The A-10 is not the anti tank plane In fact most A-10 attacks in 1991 were maverick missiles, theres better options
    4
  5. No…no he’s gotta point
    4
  6. LOL tell that to the Georgians who shit canned them the first time, Russia lost a war with a bordering nation the size of an acorn, it would be like France losing to Luxembourg
    3
  7.  @LightCrasher  the Germans redirected most planes to the west after 1941…stupid comparison
    3
  8.  @Anonymous-tj8xm  they did fuck all for the Armenians xD And continue to do fuck all in Syria against coalition jets
    3
  9. That’s what Kaiser one arm, Mr Mustache, and Uncle Tojo thought about America when they decided to fuck around and they found out
    3
  10.  @FightingSatan  sorry which nation is waging war against Ukraine? Not the US
    2
  11.  @ВиталийНедяк  ah yes and the Russian military literally present in country is not at all a contributing factor? The secret Europe (how is it Europe exactly when Europe isn’t a nation?) and American plans for coup de’tat and overthrow are only known by you, right? That makes perfect sense, I couldn’t imagine actual deployed military units affecting countries
    2
  12.  @milosjovicevic6083  not just some, did you read paragraph one? He smoking meth
    2
  13. I mean neither has led to quality of life comparable to anywhere in the west to include Germany, a nation burned to the ground the hard way, but you do you buddy I do agree though if Russia and USA stood together against China, China would be buttered toast
    2
  14.  @vascoapolonio2309  no I mean germany was burned to the ground and yet west German quality of life was better than anywhere communist including east Germany
    2
  15. China: exists
    2
  16.  @SoryRN  because Russia is invading its neighbors? And eyeing up others? So we aren’t going to trade with them the super important imports they rely on for their military
    2
  17.  @SoryRN  LOL “invaded Mexico” and “stole Mexican land” when THEY STARTED THE WAR and agreed to the treaty, they didn’t have to, but they started that war you gnome
    2
  18.  @SoryRN  learn history from outside your censored nation first
    2
  19.  @craigduncan4826  lol, someone didn’t watch the EU vs Russia video
    1
  20. Because the sino Russian border just has 0 brigades right? Yawn
    1
  21. We have it’s called Arab Israeli wars
    1
  22. But uh The USA has more soldiers than the Russians? OOPS
    1
  23.  @АлександрОкулов-е5ъ  is that why the US has the larger military, the higher tech military, and finally the larger economy? But somehow they have less of a chance than Russia? Go watch the US-Russia nuclear war showdown video, and then the “could us invade Russia by itself” video, and see how that goes bub
    1
  24.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  YouTube doesn’t hate urls, it’s on you to provide your evidence not on me to find it
    1
  25.  @HAVOKMACHINE  president Putin admitted it himself you annoying bot Also friendly reminder USA is largest oil producer in the world, not Russia
    1
  26. Tru
    1
  27.  @SRB.4S  they’re such excellent systems the Iraqis couldn’t kill double digit amount of coalition forces in 1991 No, there’s a reason former Soviet states live in shambles compared to western states
    1
  28.  @SRB.4S  that ‘easy victory’ (which, for fucks sakes yeah it should’ve been easy) required a first war that failed miserably and gave the Russians the reputation they have as a laughing stock
    1
  29.  @timp.5451  idk let’s check their international recognition and….ooooooh
    1
  30.  @gersonribeirohomem8327  of course, to attack a nation is for only two reasons Defense, or resource acquisition
    1
  31. DAYUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
    1
  32.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  lol, no
    1
  33.  @tomc9640  gee sounds like the Russian military, sounds exactly like the Russian military as they stand staring at a neighbor who has the means and material to absolutely shit can them (China) as they’re focused on some stupid politics, at least their censorship works better than France’s
    1
  34.  @MrMarineti  what?
    1
  35.  @jessefink2745  you fell for a bot yo
    1
  36.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  so that’s why nations scrap their old shit and buy new stuff at super expensive rates As awesome as Sherman was, having Sherman’s in 1960s, 70s, 80s, etc wasn’t exactly the best thing that could’ve happened for the militaries in question, just for one example
    1
  37.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  no, anyone anywhere would much rather have a T-72, T-55, or M60 over sherman, t-34, or whatever
    1
  38.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  that’s because that’s not true in the slightest The province of Texas had a revolution against the Mexican government, which surprisingly they didn’t accept the result of even tho they lost, and then as an independent state for a decade, eventually the USA and The Republic of Texas agreed to Texas joining the USA, meaning now the claims of RoT, which Mexico saw as illegitimate, were now the claims of the USA, so then the war broke out and as punishment for losing, like every loser in all of warring history, Mexico lost territory This isn’t hard to understand
    1
  39.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  now what we aren’t gonna do here is manipulate language to push our lies, you gnome Remove the quotes, it’s called the Texan revolution for a reason, orchestrated by the Americans of course which is why….they took a decade to decide to annex as the RoT was asking constantly to be annexed See how your stupid ‘muh Mexico victim!’ Doesn’t make sense?
    1
  40. No
    1
  41.  @grigoriysalzmann7223  no it’s because Russian currency is worth significantly less and wages are lower in Russia
    1
  42. Because that’s worked so many times before
    1
  43. Geography would dictate Russia would need an Airforce larger than the USA to defend it Russia is incapable of such things, they’re not playing to anything except what they had left over from the soviet times
    1
  44. Because there’s this unnerving thing when your fellow soldiers get blown up from the sky, especially when you feel the difference in how you thought that attack (because Russia is belligerent invading its neighbors) was going to go versus how it’s going It doesn’t matter if there’s one guy on the other side if you can’t even get close because the sky is speaking star spangled banner
    1
  45. You’d have it backwards, tanks can’t respond in less than a day to problems, aircraft could, it’s just Russia knows it’ll be shitcanned in the sky by anyone so they realized it would be dumb
    1