Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "How would the world change if China attacked Taiwan?" video.

  1. Whatever makes you feel better, too bad Taiwan doesn’t follow any PRC laws
    9
  2. Videos not playing for me, did you piss off Winnie the Pooh so bad he called his plants-I mean friends at Google to cancel this video?
    9
  3. Sorry to sound mean, but you’re horribly naive regarding geopolitics Then again, maybe that’s a good thing at this point, shit’s depressing
    8
  4. Why would it matter? If Beijing wants it, Beijing won’t really care if the people don’t want it See Russia for the same example
    7
  5.  @captainthundercock4336  Based on what, besides your fever dreams?
    7
  6. I’d say get out but Your tinfoil hat is too tall for the door frame
    5
  7. Holy shit! The video plays now!!
    5
  8.  666 Huang  I mean if it takes war crimes and 15 years to defeat a U.S. expeditionary force without the best US troops (because they’re in Germany Japan and Korea) and with Uber restrictive rules of engagement, then you need a new strategy
    4
  9.  @vladekostadinoski4115  ? It’s eagle Get it right
    4
  10. Commissar Binkov I can’t help but recall the last time you made a video like this I wasn’t a fan of the proceeding events
    4
  11. Russia is highly wary of making itself a Chinese client state But food shortages I’m not sure would be so worrisome, maybe
    3
  12. Sir this is a Wendy’s
    3
  13. China to this day isn’t fully confident in invading Taiwan, which does have some pro PRC people You think they could fuck around with South Korea? With america backing them as well guaranteed? Oh boy
    3
  14. Doesn’t that literally contradict the idea of one China two systems, and the whole reunification thing?
    3
  15.  @zheng4real404  also not one country on this planet has a nuke first doctrine, even the Israelis
    3
  16.  @thegameplaymemer3248  hence why china has been hoarding food for at least 3 years so far, same with agriculture supplies It depends on the length of the conflict
    2
  17.  @prismak7607  yeah it’s different from Taiwan in that it’s a stupid idea
    2
  18. The status quo is what matters for civilians, everyone loves their blissful ignorance
    2
  19. A blockade? What? A blockade would be a bad idea by anything on the surface, it would allow coalition forces to defeat the PLAN, piecemeal
    2
  20.  @barkleyg8060  well yes imminent economic collapse is quite concerning but I fail to see the relevance of the China name thing, considering Taiwan passports don’t have Mao’s face
    2
  21.  @barkleyg8060  uh yeah, I never said otherwise, but you miss my point with the passport thing
    2
  22.  @Nergüi-Khan  I know, I’m not happy about it either, I was against this nonsense when Barack Obitchma ‘verbally protested’ the invasion of Scarborough Shoals, but I don’t hold any authority
    2
  23. Uh yeah, because it’s not a total war to the death, it’s about conquering or liberating Taiwan
    2
  24.  @zheng4real404  because the US war doctrine is massive air power, and the USAF is insufficient to cover both the Indo Pacific and wage an active war with Russia Quite the strawman of an argument, also NATO would not have been obligated to intervene either, but this is of course reality, something you’re very unfamiliar with
    2
  25. There isn’t gonna be one any time soon
    2
  26. No
    2
  27. Yes, because all Binkov videos use the rule of isolated political environment, which isn’t what happened Also his timeline is still going good compared to reality, urban fighting favor the defender, Russia could seize the whole east of Ukraine, but crossing Dnieper would take weeks more, possibly months, and the western half (if it comes to that) will be a bloody fight for Russia Actually hold on tell me where he was wrong (he wasn’t but I’ll wait) Everyone who likes this comment didn’t watch the Ukraine video either
    2
  28. No reason for a war on American soil, our neighbors aren’t afraid of us like the neighbors of Russia or China
    2
  29. 1. Because it involves the whole war crimes thing 2. No 3. No 4. That’s not what China said regarding Iraq in 1990/1991…so not for Arabs but for Chinese? Makes sense considering the human rights violations against Muslims
    2
  30. You know very little about the EU then The EU has been proven that evil doesn’t really matter to them compared to economics, considering they made themselves dependent on Russian energy despite the whole 2014 thing, they’re too naive and want to live in the bubble they’ve made for themselves See Germany for a perfect example, they themselves say they live in a dream
    1
  31. That’s not how nuclear war works, there aren’t thousands of deployed weapons between america and China
    1
  32.  @CanNotName  No because it’s reverse market fixing, if you can only sell to one customer, and you need to be selling, like Russia, then you have to cowtow to their demands
    1
  33.  @KuangWen0  Uh, which nation literally has concentration, oh so sorry, reeducation camps to persecute populations in their country? Right, the Chinese government are evil fucks
    1
  34.  @manofsan do you not know 2/3 of the Chinese budget was being spent on that war and they were pushing for a ceasefire, meanwhile the US was vaguely interested with most forces deployed in Europe? Oh the copium
    1
  35.  @manofsan …they didn’t fight the US to a standstill though, UN forces were preparing another offensive around the time the ceasefire came in, China was spending 2/3 of its budget on the war, meanwhile the US was using secondary or even tertiary quality troops
    1
  36. @I eat rice and they were literally bordering them
    1
  37. You mean the war that took 15 years for sino Vietnamese-soviet forces to kick out third rate US troops (because 1st rate were in Germany and second rate in Korea) while conducting war crimes to do it? If that’s what you’re gonna rely on this time, you’ll fail
    1
  38.  @大首-r1h  1. It’s not a war of aggression, that’s not how that works 2. Maybe 3. Oh no the military buzzword of the year ‘hypersonic missiles’, hypersonic missiles have existed for decades, they’re called ballistic missiles, because ‘hypersonic’ just means ‘faster than the speed of sound’, hypersonic weapons, except for any tipped with nuclear warheads, have too pathetic a payload for the missile they’d be used on anyway Also if you think the Chinese stockpile of missiles is scary, don’t Google (well you can’t it’s illegal in China but if you could don’t) how many cruise and ballistic missiles the Americans have, it would take years before they would all be fired
    1
  39. How? It takes days just to cross the pacific and hours to cross the Strait
    1
  40.  @tangobayus  no
    1
  41.  @wontonz6129  then…Chinese people would want to invade their neighbor…and?
    1
  42.  @zheng4real404  interesting that’s not what Beijing says…weird
    1
  43.  @zheng4real404  oh no! Your comment definitely wasn’t deleted by you for being wrong, I’d need to have the original comment as what Beijing says regarding what you said is what’s relevant It was probably about how Taiwan will be ‘reunified by force if necessary’ or something or another
    1
  44. Uh…are you daft? The US fought a two front war in world war 2, and it was much more expensive than the Germans, holy fuck you people don’t actually read history do you?
    1
  45. Unlikely but not impossible
    1
  46.  @vicissitude-b9r  no they don’t
    1
  47.  @perlenoire6364  no, the Arabs don’t have millions to lose
    1
  48. No that’s not how this works
    1
  49. How?
    1
  50. ‘They encouraged Ukraine to join China’ What
    1
  51.  666 Huang  the Vietnam war had 14-15 years of direct military involvement And no, in the Korean War they were the pacific troops, not the European troops, under MacArthur, who would’ve won it (albeit somewhat…undesirably) but he was sacked But 15 years of war in which your one set piece offensive, the Tet Offensive, was only successful on the psychological side and not military side, is not a strategy you’d want to try doubling down on
    1
  52.  666 Huang  who said those were third rates? No one
    1
  53.  @狐若鬼  the UN isn’t the US for one And the US is the worlds largest source of humanitarian aid, for two But ‘muh america bad’
    1
  54.  @briant5685  humiliated? Fighting a small American UN expeditionary force with highly restrictive rules of engagement while outnumbering them 2.5-1 and still failing to throw them off the continent and getting counter attacked constantly back into the north…is humiliation to you? Are you daft?
    1
  55.  @briant5685  do you read anything you’re talking about? Again it wasn’t a humiliation especially considering the body count the US racked up, impressive for being so outnumbered, also Vietnam is again what I just said, HORRENDOUSLY restrictive rules of engagement combined with using 3rd rate troops against an enemy employing every war crime tactic possible, it’s exactly a screaming success Also Afghanistan wasn’t a U.S. defeat, the Afghan government has been calling for US withdrawal for over 5 years, but you wouldn’t know that would you, Brian? Also the ‘coalition of 30 nations’ are mostly humanitarian aid providers like Japan
    1
  56. “Omg hypersonic! There’s just a million ‘hypersonic’ (which just means faster than the speed of sound which ballistic missiles already are, it’s just a buzzword) in the world now after someone said it!” Shut up
    1
  57. The video didn’t play for me at all, I had to watch it on a private browser instead of my mobile YouTube app
    1
  58.  @vegnewb  you didn’t write anything
    1
  59.  @VashtheStampede007  who asked
    1
  60.  @VashtheStampede007  get off your high horse bucko, you’ve no ground to stand on saying what other people think. You need a reality check
    1
  61.  @infoscholar5221 I think it’s a joke
    1
  62. Okay, so why is Taiwan not bound by PRC laws?
    1
  63. No? Are you daft?
    1
  64. Can you surprise attack a nation literally waiting for your attack? Okay
    1
  65. North Korea would sell nukes? What? Taiwan acquiring nuclear weapons would literally trigger China to invade
    1
  66. They also haven’t proved useless against Russia, are you daft? One week after the sanctions hit the Ruble crashed 50% of its value and continues to do so
    1
  67. Historical examples show that in a scenario with a bigger problem to worry about in Europe, the US has a 50/50 success rate with liberating countries attacked (illegally) by their communist neighbors Oh wait! There’s no more Soviet Union to hide behind for China…that means the whole ‘we can’t invade the north or China will join the war’ problem doesn’t exist For someone touting 5,000 years of history, which, what a history of fragmentation and civil war, you seem to not know even the basics of events just last century
    1
  68. What
    1
  69. Our allies and largest trade partners aren’t worth a war? Are you insane? ‘World war 3’ with who? You mean the world against China? Who’s China’s ally? Failed state Pakistan? 3 week army of North Korea? Russia wouldn’t join the war against Taiwan they’d just hope no one would notice them
    1
  70. Who said that? Lol
    1
  71. Yeah, they did it in 1940s with less resources and allies while not technologically supreme Today? Russia is a backwater that wouldn’t look out of place in the 90s, China is the only real threat unless nuclear weapons are employed, meanwhile they’re allied with the third largest navy on the planet as the first largest navy with multiple smaller navies in support, in a naval war
    1
  72. Not how nuclear weapons work, keyboard legend
    1
  73. That’s what Hitler and Tojo thought…
    1
  74. Wait why would conflict flare up in the US compared to China? ‘Vassals’ lmao
    1
  75.  @aquagaming3480 China literally claims Japanese territory as its own, no one forced the Japanese to sign the mutual defense treaty
    1
  76.  @wontonz6129  not logical so much you can’t cite a single error Oops
    1
  77.  Joan z  no
    1
  78.  @嘿嘿嘿-o5y yes it’s population has been struggling for decades, the worker-retiree ratio has been collapsing
    1
  79. The hell?
    1
  80. Russia doesn’t provide income for the US, don’t talk out of your ass about things you know nothing about, okay?
    1
  81. Wait what does China not have that belongs to it that the US owns? You know Russia still owns territory taken from China, but don’t hear about that
    1
  82. No?
    1
  83. What clout is Africa supposed to have, the only people that would support Chinese action?
    1
  84. Yes if there was 80+ years of peace, but what’s your stupid hypothetical even matter? The Taiwanese have been independent since 1946, regardless of Winnie the Pooh liking it or not, so starting a war, in which civilians will die, cities will burn, and economics will shudder, is either evil or stupid
    1
  85.  @arckmage5218  works now, for me at least
    1
  86. No they didn’t Sort of but not uniformly Because France and Canada are US Allies? They were in Iraq both times and Afghanistan Okay, and? Besides isnt Evergrande getting another bankruptcy lawsuit? Oops
    1
  87. The US is at peace, China keeps violating everyone’s territory and has over 25 border disputes with its neighbors It just claimed territory from its big friend Russia, a war criminal state
    1
  88.  @levelazn  what’s the fucking comparison? There is none
    1
  89. China-US trade is more important to China than US, do you actually look this stuff up before talking out of your ass?
    1