Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "What if China went to war with India? Who'd win?" video.

  1. “What’s the difference between a highway to the enemy and a neutral country? Nothing” -Germany
    92
  2. SuperMidget the French occupied Moscow, how’d that work out for them?
    7
  3. Sorry brother but you’re in a severe minority
    2
  4. Unit sizes exist, using 1,000 pieces is quite simple in terms of the fact theyre divvied up in whatever way suits your nations fancy, batteries, regiments, whatever, all artillery pieces have a limit to firing that maintains the barrel life
    2
  5.  @sanchittandon9196  buzzword analysis is trash, 36 Rafale wouldn’t hold up against hundreds of J20s Regardless, Rafale wasn’t in service when this was made, but checking the date is asking too much of you
    2
  6. No, Chinese 5th Gen expansion in their Air Force would actually make the victory even more lopsided towards China
    2
  7. SuperMidget who did they take out of the war? The failure of the Russian campaign was the opportunity to make another coalition to crush the weakened French state
    2
  8. Weren’t operational when made, check date
    2
  9. That’s because of the extreme rules and strange behavior, there’s no reason india for example can’t in such a random outbreak of war occupy tens of miles into Tibet considering the 10-1 advantage
    2
  10. Chinese citizens would riot
    2
  11. Well all the Chinese using VPNs to watch this video
    2
  12. Based on what?
    1
  13.  @-bbc3848  the implication is a real war would see India invaded and pushed to the gates of New Delhi, based on what would this happen?
    1
  14.  @-bbc3848  what? What are you on about I’m so confused, are you saying China would invade India and push so far in as New Delhi or not?
    1
  15.  @-bbc3848  the Chinese never pushed India into its land
    1
  16. We already are, the border is heavily contested and clashes are still happening
    1
  17. 1. He does 2. What ‘tactics’? A platoon shooting another is pretty inconsequential to a war
    1
  18. Cool…militaries don’t exist because everyone sings Kumbaya
    1
  19. Based on what?
    1
  20. No it’s complete theory even if war breaks out Remember the whole no allies no politics no nukes stipulations?
    1
  21. Biggest missed part is trade interdiction, Chinese merchants wouldn’t make it anywhere there, including it’s oil
    1
  22. SuperMidget I never said they were weak? My point was to contradict the ‘evidence’ that Poland is powerful because they occupied Moscow
    1
  23. “No allies! No nukes! 1 year time limit!” Read the rules Adding those things is conjecture
    1
  24. Not applicable in hypotheticals
    1
  25. No, no they wouldn’t, that’s not economics works during wartime
    1
  26. Voice of the Youth Malta you focking wot? Imperialism would be colonizing them, which wouldn’t happen There’s no economic incentive, the last thing the global economy wants is not one but TWO major economies switching from commercial products to war production, if you think rioters looting businesses for Nikes is bad now then oh boy you are too naive to grasp the true nature of how that would go down in a war, even with America neutral, even with everyone else neutral, the entire planet would feel it
    1
  27. Voice of the Youth Malta luxury shoe maker Nike would benefit in war economy more than in peace economy Your opinion is no longer valid, you don’t know what you’re talking about Also America (and everyone else) neutral is one of the videos stipulations you brainlet
    1
  28. Voice of the Youth Malta says the dumbass declaring war time production being best time for luxury shoe makers who by the way have their shoes made in Southeast Asia because of the cheap labor It’s not preaching btw you pog
    1
  29. No
    1
  30.  @pyotrcapaldi451  someone didn’t watch the Russia vs China video
    1
  31.  @pyotrcapaldi451  someone didn’t watch the China vs Russia video, there is no hope for Russia as shown, prolonging the war only works in Chinese favor
    1
  32.  @pyotrcapaldi451  the ally of India wouldn’t do much as the Himalayan’s are nearly impenetrable, watch the China Vs India video There is no ‘handsome reserve’ of tanks, the Chinese have more advanced and heavier hardware, including artillery, than the Russians, the Russians lack trained crews for any reserve of armor anyway There will be 10 Chinese soldiers for every 1 Russian soldier in the eastern region, the bulk of Russian military is in Europe, not Asia, they won’t be an obstacle for the Chinese advance Watch the video, the only people who will be surrendering are Russians, if no surrender is on the cards, then the Chinese will bleed Russia to death, without the intervention of the USA, Russia would be toast, the Pakistanis would jump against India if India did go to war with China, but it wouldn’t be enough even without Pakistan being a problem, without the USA Russia could only watch as their eastern forces are dismantled and demolished The problem of the trans Siberian railway that plagued Russia in 1904 continues to this day, a war in the east would see that turned into the bottleneck that ultimately dooms the land campaign To quote the China vs Russia video: “bottom line, Chinese victory…if nuclear weapons aren’t accounted for, that is”
    1
  33.  @pyotrcapaldi451  the 30,000 tanks exposed to weather for 30 years and not maintained? Pffffffhahahaha And who’s going to crew them? No one, there’s no one available to crew them This idiot didn’t just say “10 to 1 is no issue at all”…he did, yeah at this point you’re not even worth talking to Also side note China is a cold place too, dolt
    1
  34.  @pyotrcapaldi451  Russia is much nicer than China no one said otherwise, but they’d lose, period, air supremacy? Significant Numerical superiority? Naval supremacy? Technological superiority? Reconnaissance ability? Heavier more capable hardware? It’s all on china’s side, the eastern Russia isn’t defended enough, even the entire Russian army against the entire Chinese army would see Russian defeat, frankly
    1
  35. No, that’s fucking stupid India and China are two of the worlds major economies, if they both go to war, unlike what retard US/capitalist critics claim, war isn’t profitable, war by its nature is not something you do for economic benefit, there would be major shortages due to the war production overshadowing commercial production No one wins in this war unless China is shattered which wouldn’t happen
    1
  36. Gotta remember what a random Chinese or Indian citizen even cares about is irrelevant to Beijing’s politics, or rather, border conflicts Beijing gives no fucks because they know they have the dominant Asian military
    1
  37. Yes he did, search “North Korea vs South Korea”
    1