Comments by "Ian Montgomery" (@ianmontgomery7534) on "news.com.au" channel.

  1. Its not a matter of believing one or the other but what is being said -If you are attacking someone then their retaliation is not terrorism.
    9
  2. How are you sure that it was done by the Kiev regime and not by Russians in Ukraine that are sympathetic to the Ukraine cause or even a Ukrainian version of the Wagner group perhaps. They are more likely to be able to work out suitable targets. That is probably why it is being described as terrorism as retaliation by the government of a state you are invading is not not terrorism it is retaliation.
    4
  3.  @Skybar23  As an Australian and looking at it objectively, I doubt that he could be gaoled under Federal law but I see no reason why he couldn't be gaoled if he has broken individual State laws but realistically more likely fined if that option exists.
    2
  4.  @OnlyAchievingHere  or when the crew illuminate the seat belt light in flight.
    2
  5. I'd be asking who from Trumps camp paid for him to do it.
    1
  6.  Anita Mullaly  yeah if anyone has made false voting papers then they will be able to verify which photocopier or printer produced them. I also think that Mr Trump is smart enough to pay someone to send in some false votes. (I haven't been able to watch the video as Youtube seems down in my area of Australia but I can still see replies and comments).
    1
  7.  @rswanbury8241  easy. Because State laws and Federal laws are different and a President can't give immunity to a State law.
    1
  8.  @rswanbury8241  Whilst I do agree with you it shouldn't be that way. If you have done something wrong and are caught you you should be prosecuted and the judges can decide based on evidence.
    1
  9.  Anita Mullaly  yes I am back and able to watch which i will do when i get home from work.
    1
  10.  Anita Mullaly  The opposite view is Mr Sanders told us what to expect from Mr Trump so both appear to be as thick as thieves.
    1
  11.  Anita Mullaly  I am wondering how Mr trump would have had access to the ballot papers to allow watermarks. the fact that each State produces its own ballot paper makes this a very difficult process to complete, especially in secret. I need someone to explain this to me as the time they are placed is important - if it is before people vote then it is different than if it is as they are counted for instance.
    1
  12.  @rswanbury8241  yes on Federal laws but I see no reason why they couldn't be prosecuted on State laws.
    1
  13. If you want to share it just copy and paste the relevant bit you want to share.
    1
  14. if it was in fact a spy balloon do you think they may have camouflaged it a little. It is a bit obvious as it is.
    1
  15. it is a lottery as to whose plane it was. All planes will survive such an incident.
    1