Comments by "King Ace" (@kingace6186) on "William Spaniel"
channel.
-
637
-
172
-
115
-
77
-
71
-
70
-
65
-
47
-
43
-
43
-
37
-
35
-
35
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Just an update or a key point:
All parties suspected did NOT claim any form of responsibility for this. Obviously, the attack is ugly becuase a civillian was the target & the actual target was killed, so any official prepertrator would distance themselves from this. So the most likely attacker(s) would be a maverick, partisans group. William suggested that said partisans would be Russian Resistance against the war/regime. And what's interesting is that a new supposed anti-Putin (& seemingly Pro-Ukraininan) underground partisans group -- the NRA -- claimed responsibility Monday, August 22nd. And, even calling Putin a "war criminal that betrayed the Slavic people" in the Monday statement they released. Now, since reliable, fresh inteligence is hard to get so into the Russian heartlands to effiectly investigate, none or all of this could be true. At the very least, I am sure that the Russian and Ukrainian heads of government were not directly involved -- highlighted by how irregular the attack was -- , but one should never easily underestimate the historcal precedent of a False Flag Operation. Whatever the case maybe, Putin's Regime is surrounded by more enemies than President Zelenskyy's Administration .
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bizarrely and terrifyingly enough, pre-pandemic, there actually was a push in USAF to delegate the nuclear authority of launch from POTUS & STRATCOM to POTUS & Regional Commands (I'm assuming STRATCOM would keep the authority for the non-tactical, strategic weapons). In fact, there were even rumors of bilateral talks with Russia to do the same -- I don't know if these were true. Quite compellingly, actually, the main persuasion given was that doing so would remove the need for hair-trigger readiness and its accompanying risks. However, the risks posed by tactical were in the hands of commanders (like General MacAruthr who advocated for their use in Vietnam, and people like Ramzan Kadyrov). Thankfully, the Pentagon ultimately decided to keep the status quo, at least for the time being, but the idea alone is unsettling.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fortunately, most European countries in the EU & NATO have all saved up an averaged ~70% of their energy reserves to brace for the winter. And the countries that do not have storage capabilities are also covered because Europe has decided to share the energy scarcity burden (nations storing energy for other nations). And since most Western European countries have, are expanding, and/or building facilities for importing LNG, the United States is in an empowered position to finally achieve their net energy exporter goals. Not to mention, President Biden controversially going to Saudi Arabia and getting Crown Prince MBS to break w/ the OPEC cartel's "keep the prices high" policy.
Unfortunately, there are some countries that aren't covered. Namely, the United Kingdom, not because it is sacrificing itself for Ukraini, but because of a lack of proper governance. With the insanity of Boris Johnson's final light and exit from office, the election shenanigans, the threat to unity, and Brexit tension with the EU, Great Britain didn't carefully prioritize saving for energy like the rest of Europe. But not just the UK, because small neutral nations like Austria, caught in the crosshairs, that depend on Russia for 100% of their gas are in trouble, so Putin is ironically killing neutrality. (Although, Ireland Sweden & Finland is neutral but are covered because they're in the EU). Also, other than not freezing to death, ex-soviet countries like Estonia are connected to Russia's power grid -- thankfully Finland is trying to build infrastructure to connect Estonia to their grid, but it's not as easy as pushing a button.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1