Comments by "King Ace" (@kingace6186) on "How the Moscow Attack Reveals Deeper Russian Weakness" video.

  1. Just an update or a key point: All parties suspected did NOT claim any form of responsibility for this. Obviously, the attack is ugly becuase a civillian was the target & the actual target was killed, so any official prepertrator would distance themselves from this. So the most likely attacker(s) would be a maverick, partisans group. William suggested that said partisans would be Russian Resistance against the war/regime. And what's interesting is that a new supposed anti-Putin (& seemingly Pro-Ukraininan) underground partisans group -- the NRA -- claimed responsibility Monday, August 22nd. And, even calling Putin a "war criminal that betrayed the Slavic people" in the Monday statement they released. Now, since reliable, fresh inteligence is hard to get so into the Russian heartlands to effiectly investigate, none or all of this could be true. At the very least, I am sure that the Russian and Ukrainian heads of government were not directly involved -- highlighted by how irregular the attack was -- , but one should never easily underestimate the historcal precedent of a False Flag Operation. Whatever the case maybe, Putin's Regime is surrounded by more enemies than President Zelenskyy's Administration .
    2