Comments by "King Ace" (@kingace6186) on "Sudan's conflict, explained" video.

  1.  @baha3alshamari152  That is only one small factor. That's like saying the US is struggling only because of "the crime rate" or something.
    16
  2. On one side, the billionaire warlord, Hemedti. On the other, the junta leader of the official Sudanese Military. In the middle, caught in the crosshairs, are the Sudanese people that protested for human rights, an affordable cost of living, democracy, and change. And the countless refugees who sought shelter in Sudan from Central African & HOA war/conflicts, only to find themselves back in another warzone.
    11
  3. Why can't it be both? It is true that Al-Bashir enforced Shariah Law. But it is also true that he empowered the SAF & Hemedti for self-preservation and coup-proofing purposes. After all, Shariah Law is very unpopular amongst the actual people getting hurt by it. I guess, Vox should have still given it a mention though.
    8
  4.  @TacticusPrime  Sure. But it is also a democracy that has survived 247 years, several civil & constitutional crises, and even a Civil War.
    5
  5.  @mustafa_elbashir  Thank you for the lesson.
    2
  6. Agreed. Both deserve their flowers.
    2
  7. Many of us in Tigray are praying for Sudan.❤💛
    2
  8. The funniest part about the constant Ukraine coverage is that most of what media houses report can just be covered by an armchair expert. Meanwhile, they neglect every other important current event happening around the world for "ratings".
    1
  9.  @Fjottle  Nothing is wrong with it. This person just doesn't know how to appreciate two pieces of great journalism without knocking one or the other.
    1
  10.  @tomaccino  Exactly. Besides, both JH's Team & Vox's teams still get along well.
    1
  11. Sheesh. That part, man. That part....
    1
  12. Woah man. That's underestimating the power of sustained diplomatic and economic pressures. Military interventions aren't always the answer. But even with interventions, invasions aren't the only options; ie: no-fly zone, arms embargo, etc.
    1
  13.  @modelbashir2365  Because of the G5 Security Council. If you ever ask yourself, why didn't the UN stop (insert crisis/conflict), then the answer will always be international bureaucracy. I mean, the UN doesn't even have a standing peacekeeping force; countries are supposed to benevolently deploy some forces out of the goodness of their hearts.
    1
  14. Such great reporting from both Vox and The Newsroom!!
    1