Comments by "" (@retagainez) on "ThePrimeTime" channel.

People depend on it to write working code, but somehow manage to avoid the in-depth learning they could achieve from doing cursory searches on the topic they're working in. Great research tool to an extent if you can express yourself sufficiently in a single prompt.
1
I would say polite and maybe slightly intimidated. I think it might be intimidating to see Bob laugh so frequently and intentionally during some of the arguments. But, maybe, he's just trying to make it feel less serious and more open to discussion with that. Whereas Prime is taking it a bit more serious because he's trying to purposefully understand. The ending was extremely awkward though, I got a laugh out of it.
1
So HTMX simply extends the abstraction of what an anchor, a button and a form can do and generalizing it to other elements through HTMX attributes? It seems like a unique way to extend the declarative nature of HTML and really supports the original idea of HTML. I'm unsurprised that such a useful abstraction hasn't been done until now, I'm more surprised at some of the neat functionality that presents itself just from this concept (the lazy loading, active search, etc.)
1
If it's a niche bug that requires context, it will be terrible for that. But if it's a bug based on a flawed design pattern, it might do well in pointing that kind of bug out.
1
@krYrrr I'm a lay person when it comes to these kinds of situations, but I agree. I don't think anything productive is being done here except the lady is wasting the company time by asking questions when they're declining to answer all questions. Probably the only way to get an outcome is through a court.
1
@krYrrr I wonder the same thing, depends on perspective. If she has savings, it's probably not that big of a deal. For HR people, I already feel the stress of just dealing with HR people from an interview perspective, I can't imagine what it must feel like from a firing perspective from their end. I suppose some people can thrive in a small world, but I find it hard to see that HR people don't feel conflicted that their imprint on the world regularly involves the suffering of other people for the sake of appeasing some faceless corporate entity that doesn't care for any single person. The company has a red flag of wasting of finances on these absurd processes. The tech isn't exactly bleeding edge, there are competitors, and so it's nothing to sacrifice your own personal life to. The corporate leaders that initiated this entire controversy are still in place. I'm speaking from my anecdote of being a late joiner to a public company that finally met an "end of the line" from a long history of mass firings (restructurings), only keeping the top 1% who were "long tenure" employees that were members of the original (overly large behemoth company) that went through repetitions in history experiencing companies hirings/mergers/firings. One particular event involving significant financial/tax fraud, and a final nail in the coffin due to bankruptcy. Anyway, my anecdote goes to show corporate KPIs/metrics really mean nothing, except for their finances perhaps. The common tie-in between these companies that constantly restructured was the finances. Hiring software guys is expensive, keeping your software running is expensive, some software is just not worth it.
1
I loved my software engineering class. It SUPER briefly talked about SCRUM for maybe half an hour in one lecture and then we started our own software engineering project w/ 3 other teammates. We would spend maybe only 5 min on SCRUM everyday and I was totally fine with only investing 5 minutes. I loved how we went over assertions, unit testing, and we even went over agile manifesto & design patterns from a high-level all in one class. That was the most value I've ever gotten out of a CS course, perhaps because I'm more interested in developing applications compared to traditional Computer Science.
1
CI is included as part of CD...
1