Comments by "cam lacasse" (@camlacasse3760) on "JCS - Criminal Psychology" channel.

How could the jurors not even have found neglect - did they actually attend the trial? Shame shame on them, how do they live with themselves, 11 hours given to the subject - they wanted to go home.
203
@louiswaze4603 Lack of emotion??? Last one seen with child; no one ever saw child again; car smelled of death; would not let her father go into the trunk; 31 days not reporting child missing; child's remains found in same clothes she left home with on the 16th; lies and more lies and still more lies; and you think the jury were looking for emotion? Well, you know that is the first thing that makes sense as to how they could find her not guilty. There is nothing else to pin not guilty on, with OJ it was race, but this amazed me until now, "she needed to show emotion" in addition to all the other factors. OMG!
176
@louiswaze4603 When you are in a court of law as a juror emotions should never replace FACTS - no matter how stupid one is or how insignificant they feel as a juror. 11 hours of deliberations tells you everything - hey, enough of this, let's get home. Emotions displaced the fact that Caylee was missing for 31 days and that does not reflect neglect? These jurors have to live with themselves and know they left a very dangerous person wild on our streets, who will kill again just you wait and see, this is not the end of Casey Anthony and her crimes.
55
@1mol831 I thin the jurors were tired and spent 11 hours to determine that a woman and her child last seen was found months later in the same clothes; no one had seen the child since that day, June 16. The mother continuously lied as to where or who had the little girl. There is a terrible death smell in the car after it is left by a dumpster and we know the mother left the car since her boyfriend picked her up and she explained that eventually her father would get the dar. Of course she lied and no one knew for 31 days that this little girl was even missing. Then it became an onion of lies, one after the other. She told no one her child was missing. She borrowed the shovel from net door. The child's hair - fallen from her dead head because of banding was in the trunk, along with the decomposition smell and chloroform. Now, how could anyone hearing this not convict this woman? Shame, shame on a lazy, don't give a darn for justice as we want to go home.
19
@matrixfan58 No. I am all for justice, especially for a two year old that got in her mother's way of having fun and sleeping over with her boyfriend.
13
@zacharykidd176 You don't find she was guilty of neglect by not caring for her child - her imaginary friends were obviously not caring for Caylee, the grandparents wanted to see her and knew Casey was using passive aggressiveness to keep them away they probably thought. No one but Casey knew Caylee was missing - no one knew for 31 days - and that isn't neglect? Neglect that hinges on murder since the smell of death was in Caseys car and since no one saw Caylee after the 16th the day after the blow up with her mother. Casey blamed Caylee and got rid of her that day. I used to think accident - but not any longer - an envious jealous rage and get rid of this child, my child, which my mother prefers to me and without her I can have the life I want. Oh, Casey will kill again - hope it is one of the juror's family members.
11
had 12 jurors who seemed to have had to have a video in order to show them how she exactly murdered Caylee. They had no common sense to connect the dots and they wanted to go home -- 11 hours of deliberation - tired of this and to heck with any judicial responsibility we have to the 2 years old victim, this helpless innocent child murdered by her own mother. How do they sleep at night? @penskepc2374
7
@doombuddie7968 I am a paralegal so I do know the meaning of circumstantial. Do you? A mother who murdered her two year old helpless and innocent child is out on our streets, that scares me.
6
@doombuddie7968 You know what before we had DNA every case was circumstantial evidence. Unfortunately we do not have a video of every murder committed, so we have to use common sense and connect the dots. This woman will kill again and that is the precedent this will set. Both she and OJ - got away with murder. But to murder the innocent child of two takes a very evil person with a very dark core. God will.gave His Karma and it will not be pretty. Just imagine if she had gone through with her plan to also murder her parents - so she could get the house. She will make headlines again one of these days, This kind of murderer doesn't just quit.
5
@doombuddie7968 You have your opinion. I suggest to you that you excuse yourself from any jury in future as you unless they have a video of the crime committed. I don't agree, I agree with the Judge who was so stunned, shocked, he said he actually had to read the sentence twice to be sure he read it correctly. He said the prosecution proved its case and that both sides of lawyers were very good. He went on to say, that PERHAPS, it was an accident that the mother gave too much chloroform and went on to mention the two Casey Anthonys. As soon as the jury came in she was silent and a victim; but when the jury exited the court room, she laughed, giggled, talked to the attorneys and it seemed she was even ordering them what to do. I am of the same opinion of the judge who was in charge of this notorious trial by careless and stupid jurors.
2
How can her parents be so kind and sweet to her under these circumstances? She is the only one who knows where Caylee is and the grandparents know this, yet it is beyond belief they keep believing her lies and her "know nothing", "do nothing". No tough love here for sure and there should be, and should have been for a long time during her life.
1