Comments by "Hercules Koutalidis" (@herculeskoutalidis1369) on "Could Le Pen Win? The Resurgence of France's Far Right - TLDR News" video.

  1. Unfortunately, as the video says, even Le Pen is getting worse with wanting to become more '''''moderate''''... :)
    17
  2. Le Pen is not going to mess up German-French relations if she gets elected. Macron on the other hand is going to turn France into a western Middle Eastern country that will border Germany. Good luck with that.
    16
  3. Brown replacement of the french people has led the french people towards resisting their replacement by brown people :D
    16
  4.  @Quentin-vi4zi  AfD is not even close to '''fascism'''. More like a conservative party, just like RN. At today's pace, western Europe will not even be european in 20 years. In 2050, Germans in Germany are projected to be about 50% of the population. Same in Fance, Italy, Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK. There will be no natives in these countries by 2100.
    10
  5.  @WolfyOfHonor  how is AfD fascist?
    8
  6.  @meneither3834  if France has the RN, and Germany the AfD, there will remain some French people living in France, and some German people living in Germany, and the quality of their populations will not deteriorate, as it is deteriorating now due to immigration.
    6
  7.  @tobiasbauer198  AfD is Europe's and Germany's last chance to avoid permanent destruction. The only somewhat reasonable out of Germany's parliament parties currently. Don't listen to these '''weird people''' (let's call them that for now) here spouting nonsense. The whole of Europe is counting on parties like AfD and RN.
    6
  8.  @DeutschlandMapping  they are on the side of the political compass that promotes replacement of the native population with peoples of lower quality. :)
    6
  9.  @DeutschlandMapping  nordicist :)
    5
  10.  @igoralmeida9136  if every extreme is on the same team, then how can it be explained, that the far left wants whites to be replaced, and the far right does not? :)
    5
  11.  @joostvandenoord4336  Ι am both scared and sadened that this is happening. Should I be happy that the more beautiful and creative people are being slowly replaced by uggli not-so-creative non-whites? This must be stoped and reversed, before western civilization is destroyed.
    4
  12.  @hegen7642  are you German? are you aware that Germany is projected to be 50% German by 2050 (and then even less)? Are you aware that the US will be 50% white by 2050? Can you imagine what this will mean for civilization? Immigration from the south to the north must be forbidden, and reversed immediately.
    4
  13.  @Diabolo0011  could be anywhere. Political position is not determined by where the other people are :)
    3
  14. Where?
    3
  15.  @sicgc7658  ok so I guess you would haeve no problem when Scotland will be 30% Pakistanis& Indians and other uggllie darker peoples, just like England is today, just 30 years after it also was '''only 3% non white'''. Correct?
    3
  16.  @sicgc7658  so what do you expect the census in 50 years to show? And if the ''''people with more melanin'''' become 90% of the population would this be ok with you? Say goodbye forever to beautiful white blond people? :)
    3
  17.  @jazzjj7665  it is not the color of the skin, but the shape of the face bones in the skull. Northern Europeans have the most beautiful characteristics on average. It is not relative. No "Anglo-Saxon" really wants their babies to have black or middle Eastern people's faces. Maybe they will realize it when they will become 20% of the population of their neighborhood.
    3
  18. ​ @Luca-nu2zg  everyone that does not support replacing their better native population with populations of less quality is framed ''''far right'''' (by our beloved media-and only) these days.. :)
    3
  19. Because people are stupid and forget easily apparently.
    2
  20.  @tylerstevenson8085  yes.
    2
  21. ''''democracy'''' at its best...
    2
  22.  @DeutschlandMapping  how are FvD and PVV not healthy for a democracy exactly?
    2
  23.  @edsiles4297  bhahahahaha XD
    2
  24. She is barely center-right :D
    2
  25.  @Kafei01  what is bad about all these? these are good things.
    2
  26.  @jazzjj7665  I never said that brown people are a threat to anyone. I did say that they are replacing french ,etc people, and that that is bad, because as a result, the average beauty of the population is being reduced. Nations are not equally beautiful as you should have noticed. The more north you go, the more beautiful the average becomes.
    2
  27. We would wish!
    1
  28. Vive Le Pen!
    1
  29. Who controls the media? :)
    1
  30. And what will the percentage (%) of french people living in France be in 2050 then? :) 50? 30%? :)
    1
  31.  @liam4105  the term nation MEANS ethnicity..they are the same thing.
    1
  32.  @janv4143  of course you are German because Swedish and Germans look relatively alike, and the child of a swedish couple raised in Germany will not look different from an ordinary German. The same goes for all north Europeans, and to some extent to all Europeans. But if you keep importing darker races, your country will become darker. it has nothing to do with Nationalism. It has to do with eugenics. Immigration from the south to the north must be forbidden, otherwise the better races will become extinct (also because they have stoped reproducing, because they have become lazy as a result of materialism).
    1
  33.  @Minifutzi_o.O  Where are you from, Chris?
    1
  34.  @tylerstevenson8085  so?
    1
  35.  @tylerstevenson8085  all I am saying is that the more north you go, the more beautiful people become, and therefore immigration from the south to the north must be forbidden, and reversed.
    1
  36. It would be good for the entire world.
    1
  37.  @DenisHavlikVienna  ah! indeed :D , believe Le Pen actually means it. I do not believe they would try to abolish the EU. At least not all of it :D
    1
  38.  @DenisHavlikVienna  but even if these were true, then you can vote them down at the next elections :D
    1
  39.  @MDP1702  the only part of EU legislation that I (and Le Pen's party) find negative, is the ''''freedom of movement'''', which leads to a (very) higher immigration from eastern and southern Europe, to northern and western Europe. Le Pen might try to abolish this (only). Apart from this, I do not see much more needed. Like I can't imagine Europe going back to government controled trade, by imposing tariffs on foreign goods. Even the UK has no tariffs with the EU. Also, I would guess Le Pen would try to make immigration to any EU country harder, by starting some EU-wide conversation about this, which is also good.What I am saying, is that the EU is almost imposible to abolish as a whole. Some legal parts maybe. But free trade, common external policy, internal close cooperation, I don't think so..
    1
  40.  @DenisHavlikVienna  the (biggest) problem that Europe faces today, as far as I understand, is that in countries like France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and also the UK, indigenous population is projected to be less than 50% of their population, by 2050 (and then even less, 40%, 30%) as a result of immigration, and fertility rates lower than the replenishment rate of 2.1 . This is lowering the quality of the population of these countries day by day.. I am 27, have been always in favor of the EU. But I see that if the current EU-wide immigration system is not reformed, there will be no French people left in France, no German people left in Germany, no Dutch people left in the NL, no Austrian people left in Austria, etc.. I believe we have no other choice than to stop this, and fast..
    1
  41.  @MDP1702  my problem is not immigration itself. Here is the problem. Nations are not equally beautiful. The more north you go, the more beautiful people become. This means, that immigration from the south to the north should be forbidden, otherwise the more beautiful people will become extinct. I suppose nobody from us wants this to happen :)
    1
  42.  @MDP1702  I do not have anything against immigration from countries with more beautiful people, to countries with less, or about equaly beautiful people. I know that what I say is racist, but it is also true, and if we do not solve the problem now, we will either have to solve it later, or the more beautiful races will become extinct.
    1
  43.  @MDP1702  but of course it does. But then you would have to explain to us why this is bad, and also how you are going to prevent white countries from becoming darker with time.
    1
  44.  @MDP1702  ok I see. Are you white?
    1
  45.  @MDP1702  then I suppose you have noticed that you (and whites in general) find non-whites unattractive. Both socially, and sexually. The '''philanthropist''' propaganda of our times aside. Am I correct? (note also that not being 100% honest at this point, will not get this conversation anywhere further).
    1
  46. it is like this all over the world...meanwhile, Trump and Le Pen hardly qualify as right wing :D Maybe liberal haha :D
    1
  47.  @weetbix4497  because they don't kick islam out of France.
    1
  48. There will be no French people in 50 years.
    1
  49. You sure your elections and polls are not rigged? :)
    1
  50. At this pace, there will be no French people in France by the end of the century.
    1
  51. Until France becomes 40% brown, at which point non-Le Pen voters will suddenly switch to voting her :D
    1
  52. Bring back Petain!!!!
    1
  53.  @KameroonEmperor  I have sent a (humoristic) comment 4 times, with a picture of Petain and AH, but dgewish Yew Tube took it down 4 times, so I wil just say, Vive Marechal Petain!
    1
  54. Is someone that tries to keep a country white, therefore creative, ''''stoping progress'''''?
    1
  55.  @user-xu2pi6vx7o  non white?
    1
  56. Well they are not :) Le Pen is barely center-right :D
    1
  57.  @lawden210  it is in the top/best 2-3 parties all in all, I believe.
    1
  58. @Manwinder Singh they are anti-white.
    1
  59. There has been no chaos under Trump. Only with Macron.
    1
  60. And how can they prevent french people from being relaced by uggli brown people? :)
    1
  61.  @arkues  why not?
    1
  62.  @arkues  I don't understand. Germans in Germany are projected to be 50% of Germany's population by 2050, and whites in the US are projected to be 50% also by 2050.
    1
  63.  @janv4143  well I do not want whites to become wxtinct, so I guess you can call me far-right :)
    1
  64.  @igoralmeida9136  jreg?
    1
  65.  @lilli4484  So?
    1
  66.  @lilli4484  I never said there can be no French people of color. I said that whites do not like their babies to look non-white. Second. 10-15% is their current percentage. What will it be in 20, 50,100, 200 years? :) (And thirdly, no, the French are neither descendants of Angles nor Saxons, they are largely the descendants of the Franks, Celts and ancient Romans.)
    1
  67.  @lilli4484  I did not say whites can have non white babies. I said they would not like to (nevertheless), just like they don't like non white people in general, because they are less beautiful and attractive. The French as a percentage in France are projected to shrink. I do not know where you got the idea that they will remain the same from. The "Muslim problem" has NOT been a thing in France, because there were no Muslims or browns in France just 100 years ago.
    1
  68.  @lilli4484  1) +2 to 5 is not a change?? This is 4.5% of the current population of France! 2) how many millions of native european french person's will be lost in the meantime, as a result of the fertility rate being less than what it has to be (2.1 children per person) , in order for the population to remain stable? The native european french population is therefore decreasing, because people have stopped reproducing themselves, but the population of immigrant Background makes children faster than the native european population, while new immigrants come. 3) In 1960, France was (as a result) 100% white (and 99% french). In 1990, it was only 93% white. In 2000 it was 89% white, and now it is 85%, and you tell me that white replacement is a hoax. Inform yourself. People of color are not only coming to these countries, but they are also born inside them, at a rate that is faster than that the white natives reproduce themselves. The US was 90% white in 1960, now it is 65%. But yeah, replacement is definitely a lie.
    1
  69. Hopefully Geert Wilders wins, or else there will be no Dutch people in the NL in a couple of years.
    1
  70.  @asdzhmm4137  because the people that rule the world want left wing governments and not right wing ones, because this way they can ''''''change''''' the world according to their ''''model''''', while with right wing politics, they cannot.. :)
    1
  71. Why?
    1
  72.  @simonblurton8009  and why is this bad in our case?
    1
  73.  @zexal4217  what is the percentage (%) of whites going to be in France in 2100?
    1
  74.  @zexal4217  wanting to keep your country white is not white supremacism. White conservatism, maybe :)
    1
  75.  @simonblurton8009  because the whiter one is, the more beautiful they are. And if the percentage of these whites goes down, so does the average beauty of the country. And I see no reason to make this.
    1
  76. What is happening? Are they trying to keep the US and the UK white? :D
    1