Youtube comments of Hercules Koutalidis (@herculeskoutalidis1369).

  1. 140
  2. 100
  3. 98
  4. 67
  5. 54
  6. 40
  7. 35
  8. 27
  9. 26
  10. 26
  11. 25
  12. 23
  13. 21
  14. 21
  15. 17
  16. 17
  17. 16
  18. 16
  19. 16
  20. 15
  21. 13
  22. 12
  23. 10
  24. 10
  25. 10
  26. 10
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 8
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34. 8
  35. 8
  36. 8
  37. 7
  38. 7
  39. 7
  40. 7
  41. 6
  42. 6
  43. 6
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 5
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 5
  61. 5
  62. 5
  63. 5
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. Greece here. But of course!Obviously! There are no EU members that have and are benefiting more than Germany, and the NL. There was a plan to have everything in ALL EU states imported from Germany (and the Netherlands). Greece has (since the 80s) the highest trade deficit in GDP terms in the EU (who profits from that? Bavaria of course). But why did (the EU creators= the french) they want that so? To contain and control Germany. Remember that (in case you do not already know it). The more Germany exports (to the US, England, France, and the rest of the EU), the more politicaly DEPENDENT it becomes on their purchases. What if in the future Germany does not comply with franco-british political demands? They impose big tariffs on german products, hereby destroying (a harsh word) german growth (economy as a matter of fact). So the UK (and France-although not allied now.., and the US) should not be afraid of having big trade deficits with germany. On the contrary. Smaller economies (that are also forced to use a currency whose monetary role is to serve ONLY german interests) like Greece and Portugal (and all of the eurozone) however are suffering the biggest economic disaster since the war (wehave 25+% unemployment) exactly because of these german trade surpluses (we simply don t have enough economic space to put workers to work-all manufacturing/goods jobs have moved to southern Germany since the 1980s-2000s..we are left with lawers/law firms, language schools, cafeterias (haha!!!) , taverns, and everything that has actually no german/dutch/italian/french competition.
    3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. ​ @milantoth6246  ''''' to corruption, tyranny, communism, the east, authoritarianism, and through the current government and/or its spiritual successors.''''' So let's see: 1. corruption : I believe V.Orban and his government has every reason to want to reduce corruption as much as possible. But even if there is some corruption, I believe Hungary is already currently ranked as one of the western world's least corrupt countries. So maybe you need to check if your measurement of corruption is a rational one. Namely, it is not wise to compare corruption in a state formed just in 1989 (like Hungary), with a state formed in 1707, like the UK, or Sweden, or Germany, or the NL, etc, and say, that 5% more corruption, is a failure of the government. Otherwise, as far as I know, corruption in Hungary should be the problem that least concerns one, right now. 2. Tyranny: how is your current government tyrannic? Tyrannic, means illiberal. Whom is your government iliberal to? Answer: not even one. I would be far less liberal than V.Orban, if I were the PM of Hungary, without being tyrannical at all. Your judgement is nonsensical at best, dishonest. 3. The east. What is wrong with the east? Is China or Russia buying serious parts of your economy? which ones? Explain. How does that compare to Germany and the US? Whose ideological influence is ultimately worse? My answer: the West's. (You must note here that the West's ideology used to be overall better than the East's. By 1989. Not anymore. Also note that Russia and China do not share the same ideology, and are also very different culturally, and obviously, genetically.) 4. Authoritarianism: authoritarianism is not fundamentally bad. Tyranny is. Go back to (2). Furthermore, our current parliamentarian systems do not allow for authoritarianism. Why? Because our governments are backed by our parliaments, who were elected by us. So if Orban wants to do A, he needs 51% of MPs to say '''''ok''''''. In which case he is obviously enough not authoritarian. In case he does not get 51% PMs to say '''''ok''''', then he CANNOT do A. In which case he is also obviously enough not authoritarian. So maybe what you in fact mean, that it is the majority of the hungarian PEOPLE, who in fact force some of their opinions to minority opinions (of 20% let's say), who want to not do A. In which case it is the legal system ITSELF that is authoritarian, and not the hungarian government, which is just following the law. I admit, that current parliamentarianism can leed to such inoptimal(?) situations, in which 51% of the public, CAN in fact, FORCE their opinion to any other minority. So this is not a perfect system maybe. But can you come up with a better one? :) PS. I am greek. For a peculiar reason, your small country has the best government, together with that of Poland and Russia, when measured by the quality of the prospective civilizational state of your country/the respective countries, in 100 years from now. You know what I am talking about :)
    2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. ​ @disappointedenglishman98  maybe I don't. I am not disagreeing with your concerns and arguments in principle. I do not see why the UK should pay 30bn€ to the EU (once? regularly?). Neither do many people of course. That does not mean that there is not a reason for it. What is your government's argumentation on it? Why does it believe that this money (and a lot of money that is) should be paid? Canada does allow the US to set its regulations, by only allowing parties to exist, that are in '''at least some''' agreement with the prevailing interests of the US. Canada does allow the US to set all or most of canadian politics, without people knowing or noticing about it. It is a really long and complicated conversation. But I will give you the fact, that Canadians have the sense of ''''being free'''' from US politics. They are not. But they feel so. And this is what matters most. What you do not know, is the fact that, as you saw, you cannot have free trade with a country, without avoiding it influence your politics. If there a moment comes in history, when Canada(that is the Canadian people) comes in actuall disagreement with the US , Canada can do little about it, because the US will start imposing tariffs to canadian products, hurting Canada until they give up on their policy, that the US does not approve. Obviously, Canadian politicians decided a long ago, that this is highly improbable to happen, and that the economic benefits of free trade with the US, will be greater, than this possibility of political contrast, while having free trade. Have you ever wondered why AH wanted to terminate all trade with external nations? :) Because he knew, that when the time comes, external nations that do not agree with his policies, will cause trouble by disrupting this trade. I believe you are right in wanting just free trade with the EU, without pooling your democratic system with ours. I myself am starting being critical against it. But not from the national interest -point of view. Again, I believe you are right in only wanting free trade. On the other side, if every country starts pursuing its own national interest, there is for instance no logical or moral reason why for example France and Germany (and others) will not ally against you, in order to make way for their alliance's/own interests :) What would be wrong with that? You would've previously done the same :) You know what I'm saying? Just don't ask for too much for yourself :D
    1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286.  @1neAdam12  simple '''''white educators'''''' are not of the intellect, of the german Chancelor, the President of the US, any other white (and non white!) nation's head of state and government. They can do it out of stupidity, just like there are 17-year-olds who actually believe CRT and the likes when they are completely naive yougsters, until they get 20 or 24, and realize what it is actually about, and turn.....'''''red pilled''''. But when you see the Chancelor of Germany, the British PM, the POTUS, and the WHOLE of their parties supporting what they support, then this should give you a second red pill, and you should start wondering how it can be, that so many whites of way bigger intellect than yours (yes man, they are more wise and intelligent than you :D) take part in the conspiracy. Angela Merkel (and anyone similar) does not take part in the conspiracy because she was paid money. She takes part in the conspiracy, because she was PERSUADED to do so (with her own freedom of choice and opinion). :) This means that Angela Merkel knows things, that you do not yet know, and that, if you did know them, then maybe you would want to take part in the conspiracy as well :) I also believe, that, the conspirators, although wanting people take part in the consp (because there must be enough persons to undertake the respective actions) and therefore know, they do not want MANY people to know. (otherwise they would just spread the important info I am talking about to everyone). So they want ONLY a few to know, and be part of it. (why only a few? Idk. But for some reason they want only a few). I repeat. The whites/non js that take part in the consp, were not bribed, or forced to do so. They take part of it, because they want to. Because they believe in what they are doing. (obviously, the js too :) ). You must also notice, that the conspirators, can only have the best of intentions for the Earth, and for mankind, because otherwise, it makes no sense. To put it otherwise, there is no reason to do a bad thing just for the sake of it. To put it otherwise, there is no reason to replace the beautiful creative Swedish people with Middle Esterners, just for fun :) There must be a GOOD reason (that we do not know) for it. :)
    1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423.  @nocomment00  I believe you confuse the concepts of ''''the EU''''', '''''''the left'''''', and the '''''''EPP''''''' (european peoples party). The EU, is not left wing. The EU, is not right wing. The EU does not want anything at all. It does not want to preserve the nation-state. it does not want to disolve the nation-state. It does not want to replace the dutch people with non-dutch people. It does not want to preserve the dutch people. It does not want anything at all. The EU is a political organization, that is governed by: 1. The (EU) Commission. 2. The (EU) Council. 3. The (EU) parliament. (4. other EU institutions) 1,2 and 3, are elected, or somehow determined by the peoples living (voting) in the EU. The peoples of the EU, have elected the parties called EPP, SD, RE to rule over these 3 major institutions. It is these 3 parties that are responsible for the ''''''phenomena''''' and actions, that you describe as ''''''left wing''''' in your comment. To put it clearly, it is not the fault of the EU, that your country, the Netherlands (or Belgium) is losing its cultural identity, and that the Dutch people are slowly being replaced by other peoples inside the Netherlands. It is the fault of the Dutch people, because they systematically vote for parties like VVD, D66, PvdA, Volt, etc, etc, who want to undertake these policies. I repeat. The (negative) phenomena that you describe, must be debited to the peoples of Europe. Not the EU. One last example: Hungary, is inside the EU. Hungary is almost 100% hungarian, 100% white, and its people systematically vote against their slo replacement. And as a result, Hungary remains 100% hungarian today. But it is an EU member nonetheless. So again, blame the Dutch people (who vote accordingly). Not the EU. :)
    1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546.  @robertocalibancove8245  why is workers losing '''''trade power'''' a bad thing? For instance neo-liberal countries like the UK, the US, Ireland, or the Netherlands, are a lot wealthier than social democracies like France, Italy, or Spain. Apart from this, I believe wages in your country, Italy, are rising, which is mostly a result of Italy selling its products to even less competitive markets like my country, Greece, Croatia, or even France, thus having a huge trade surplus with the rest of the single market. If you exit the single market, Greece and France will impose tariffs on your products, and so you will lose income that you would then use to buy products from them, or other countries, like the US. You would therefore become way poorer. Germany and the Netherlands are more competitive than Italy, and others , and will remain so whatever you do, just because their populations are more advanced technologically, and philosophically, Roberto. You can do nothing about it. Just in case german or dutch or swedish economic rivalry is your concern. The single market, as well as the Euro, are very good for Italy, because they will accelerate your least competitive companies death, your GDP will fall by 3%, your population will decrease accordingly by 5%, and in the new equilibrium, you will be (1-3%)/(1-5%) = 2% wealthier, just by having your least competitive businesses closed to german competition. So the single market and especially the Euro will make Italy wealthier. Making spoons (or anything else) less efficiently than Germany, will add 3% to your GDP, but will increase your population by 5%, making you poorer per person. Let me tell you what my problem about ''''''eu integration'''''' is. It is that Germans will slowly be replaced by less beautiful Greeks and Italians. :(
    1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1