Comments by "Theodore Shulman" (@ColonelFredPuntridge) on "mRNA future" video.

  1. You need to learn more about this subject, immediately
    9
  2. What this nurse didn’t tell you is: the cells which get mRNA will indeed express the antigen, but only for a very short time! Not long enough for the body to mount any significant auto immune response against the cells expressing the antigen. By the time the immune system processes the antigen and responds to it, the cells have cleared out the mRNA and have stopped making antigen on their surfaces. Also, as a general thing, only a very small fraction of the cells distant from the injection site express antigen at all. Sure if you want to be superstitious and squeamish about new medication’s and new classes of medication, that’s up to you. But this kind of knee-jerk anti-vax alarmism-for-profit is not persuasive. (I suppose I should put this in for full disclosure: I am a retired small-pharma antibody-chemist. I retired many years before COVID, and no longer have any financial skin in the immunology game.)
    2
  3. My experiences with FDA (actually vicarious experiences - I didn't interact directly with them, but I worked alongside of some folks who did) was surprisingly good. Everyone at the company expected their (FDA's) people to be three-headed monsters but they turned out to be very smart, conscientious, energetic scientific bureaucrats, trying to do incredibly demanding jobs well. FDA isn't perfect, but they manage to avoid most of the obvious possible blunders, which is the best one can expect from an agency like that, charged with preventing and correcting scientific errors in a very esoteric, rapidly-evolving field. One other thing: it's a mistake to evaluate Dr. Fauci as an expert in HIV, COVID, FIKA, SARS, or vaccination, although he excels in all those areas. His central, nearly-unique expertise is in on how to deal with a much scarier, much more alarming pathogen: the terrifying scourge known as Pestis WeDon'tKnowWhatTheHellItIsYetOrWhatIt'sGonnaDoNext. Now that is a challenging specialty.
    2
  4.  @Psykrom  You don't know what you're talking about. There's no point in talking to you.
    1
  5.  @Psykrom  If you are worried about nanolipids and an unnameable "something else", then why talk about the spike protein?
    1
  6.  @Psykrom  This video is about the spike protein. If you want to talk about nanolipids, you should comment on a video about nanolipids.
    1
  7.  @Psykrom  You made a typo. You wrote "a false flag information warrior/agent" but you should have written "a retired monoclonal-antibody chemist with experience in small-pharma immunology as well as general immunochemical expertise."
    1
  8.  @Khayyam-vg9fw  I'm sorry, but at this time you are not smart enough to understand immunology or epidemiology. Good luck in your future efforts to improve your intelligence, if you decide to try to do that.
    1
  9. Wrong
    1
  10.  @donman9154  They're also spiking the Ivermectin with microchips to control your mind.
    1