Comments by "Theodore Shulman" (@ColonelFredPuntridge) on "'Is That Accurate?': Jim Jordan Calls Out Dr. Fauci On Lab Leak Using His Own Correspondence" video.

Personally, I think that someone who doesn't know anything about epidemiology or virology but thinks he knows enough to say whether or not another person who does know about these subjects is lying about an outbreak is a lil thing I like to call "stupid".
6
@divinenation22 If we had not isolated and purified the virus, how in the world would we know, and be able to modify, its complete RNA-sequence???
2
@divinenation22 Where's your evidence that it doesn't? You are the one pushing a non-mainstream opinion so the burden of proof is on you, not on me.
2
Dr. Wade says "there's new scientific evidence". But some of the new information the Department of Energy used for their new evidence is classified. So how would Dr. Wade, who no longer works for the government, have seen it? And if he hasn't seen it how does he know whether there's any new evidence?
1
@710earl HAhahahahahaha Funny joke
1
@brieziethirteen13 If you had been working with viruses for even one year, then you would know that Fauci did not "bulid" the virus (not even his worst enemies say that he had any direct hand in it; so far the worst they have said is that he has some responsibility for funding Chinese scientists who built it). Well, perhaps you can explain the difference in life-cycles between coronaviruses (which carry their genetic information in the form of RNA) and retroviruses (which also carry their genetic information in the form of RNA). What do retroviruses do which coronaviruses do not do, and how does the difference affect their different life-cycles and the different courses of the diseases they cause? If you have taken even one course which includes any information about viruses, you should be able to answer that in a few seconds without looking it up. I'm betting you can't even if you do look it up!
1
@uplanddigitaldreamer But being falsely accused, by for-profit conspiracy-theory-minded loop-a-dupes, of treason, crimes against humanity, conspiracy, and lying to Congress, is not punishable at all.
1
@divinenation22 You don't have to prove or disprove anything! And that is a good thing for you, since you can't. But if you don't, then there's no reason for anyone to bother with your opinion. I go with what the mainstream says UNLESS someone shows that it's wrong (ie disproves it).
1
@divinenation22 There you go again, with this silly idea that ordinary people who don't know virology or epidemiology can form an opinion about COVID which is worth anything. Now, I am a retired antibody chemist and I know a bit about this - but I resist the urge to form my own opinion, because my expertise does not include virology, so I don't know enough. You, whose expertise does not include any biology at all, should resist the urge to form an opinion even more vigilantly. You should have only one opinion: the true opinion that you don't know the answer.
1
@brieziethirteen13 As I thought. You know nothing about this, but you have an opinion about it even so. That means you will be stupid forever. (Sorry to give you bad news.)
1
@Kobisashi If you don't know English, I can't help you.
1
@brieziethirteen13 I'm sorry: what were you trying to prove by posting this patent?
1