Comments by "Michael Mappin" (@michaelmappin1830) on "Jordan B. Peterson Fails At Science - Twitter Dunks On Him" video.
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ejackcity34 , what are you talkin about? :-) leftist policies in the UK? Privatization and deregulation is rampant.
I already told you that Trudeau is not a leftist. And besides, the environment of Canada today was shaped by Stephen Harper, who was in power for an entire decade prior to Trudeau! He would be the equivalent of your George Bush. Are you familiar with the political Spectrum, its history and evolution? For your information leftists don't cut regulations, increase privatization, bail out Banks, Etc. if you want an example of a leftist, consider Eugene Victor Debs, Big Bill Haywood, Thomas Paine, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Janet Rankin, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Rosa Parks, Susan B Anthony, Etc. LOL would you really compare Justin Trudeau and Obama to any of those people? :-)
you say that I'm the typical leftists? How would you know? But yeah, I am! I believe that wealth should actually stay with the wealth producers. no one should be entitled to the wealth generated by someone else! I believe that communities should own and control their own resources and labour.
But anyway, like I said, if you want to trust the news that's paid for by big corporations, go for it! But don't tell me that it's reliable, objective and impartial. Because it's not! again, it's like the tobacco industry spending billions of dollars on studies that show there's no correlation between smoking and lung cancer. and again, their record speaks for itself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davewade30 , for example,
1. you completely ignore how many times Jordan Peterson has been caught lying. Even after he was caught lying and challenged on it, he continue to lie!
2. Mr. Peterson has gone out of his way to stop Bill C 16 which would greatly harm and probably lead to the continued deaths of many gay and transgender people. Does mr. Peterson care? Well, he continue to stop the bill even though he was corrected on the nature and limitations of that bill. That is a fact. Not my personal opinion. Why would he do such a thing? What is his motive?
3. Mr. Peterson makes spurious and fallacious claims. He does this constantly! For example, saying that it's not possible to stop smoking without Supernatural intervention. You tried to defend that point, saying people just misunderstand. You're grasping at straws! He outright said that it's not possible. any person with half a clue would have said that Supernatural intervention would greatly improve one's odds of stopping smoking. That would be the natural response. But he didn't say that, did he? No. He said it's not possible! When the interviewer then expressed extreme incredulity, Peterson said, not really. the fact that you would actually try to defend mr. Peterson on this point is absolutely ridiculous! I could probably bring up another 30 or 40 examples of this type of behaviour. but you would just make excuses, as Peterson often does, claiming that people are just simply misunderstanding him. Again, there has to be some motive for you to actually try to defend untenable positions.
4. Jordan Peterson to this very day continues to claim that Marxist will not debate him! but you'll never see him debating mr. Richard Wolff, because Peterson has made so many false claims, stating them as truth , that he now has no choice other than to avoid mr. Wolf. Peterson doesn't understand Marxism. he made numerous claims as to know what marks was talking in various areas. He was dead wrong on most of them! simple things that even a child should have been able to grasp. now these statements are on the internet and Peterson has to run like a child. :-) just like with that idiotic claim as to thinking that ancient civilizations had knowledge of DNA. there's actually another video where he was challenged on that statement. a person went up to him and said he could make such a claim. Peterson at first try to deny it! see, more evidence of the type of lying sack of that he is. when the person pointed out that he actually attended the class where he made the claim, Peterson then backtracked and said that wasn't what he meant. he said it was just a mere suspicion. LOL
anyway, I could go on and on and on, probably for hours. the man is a joke. it should be obvious to you. it's not too hard to substantiate. but you're not able to for some reason. I find that interesting. I find it interesting that there's so many people that are taken in by snake oil salesman.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1