Comments by "Steven Goldstein" (@stevengoldstein114) on "Jordan Peterson - My Problems with Ayn Rand" video.

  1. Jordan is trying to express expertise in everything, but he has not addressed his conduct in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility
    1
  2.  @ArchPrime  say that to the parent who won in family court and the family of the man that was killed he was convicted.
    1
  3. @ArchPrime  the fact he was paid to defend him maemkes him an accessory after the fact.
    1
  4.  @ArchPrime  the court records are objective, they follow due process, rules of law and evidence, and you are just trying to avoid it. Just pull it up from the CanLII records.
    1
  5.  @ArchPrime  YouTube will not let me provide links, but you can search them yourself. I did not say he lied, I did say he was found as unprofessional and unreliable in the cases. Making false conclusions. You just inserted something into my words.
    1
  6.  @ArchPrime  read the article Canada's Courts rule on Jordan Peterson: "As close to 'junk science' as anything that I have ever been asked to consider". The links and documents are there
    1
  7.  @ArchPrime  the court decisions are linked in the website above. You simply are saying you don’t want to see it. But it is there, and anyone searching “Jordan Peterson Junk science” will find it. It also has excerpts copied in the website as well.
    1
  8.  @ArchPrime  History does not sometimes allow for any benefit for Jordan. It is simply complete history and nothing but history. The author has an impressive background Lamont holds Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts degrees in English literature from the University of Manitoba. He was a vice-president of the Graduate Students' Association and a member of the University of Manitoba Board of Governors. Lamont worked as an instructor in government–business relations at the University of Winnipeg. Sorry but Jordan has to explain this.
    1
  9.  @ArchPrime  simply put, this is not an authority issue. It is an issue of conduct, and simply put the conduct of Jordan was not only unscientific, unprofessional, and unethical, it it has been established based on established standards. You can try to claim he was persecuted, but by all independent standards he failed in his work badly.
    1