Youtube comments of J Hutt (@jhutt8002).
-
904
-
484
-
248
-
110
-
84
-
61
-
59
-
49
-
46
-
34
-
34
-
31
-
28
-
20
-
20
-
Endowment isn't irrational. I think it boils down to one effect economists always tend to downplay or miss completely: That most people have very limited money supply. So buying and selling are not the same or comparable transactions.
Unlike money, most items are non-fungible, and less liquid as well.
If I own 1000 eur guitar and I play guitar, it makes no sense to me to sell it, if I need the guitar more than I need the money.
However if I don't already own the guitar, I probably can't afford to buy 1000 eur guitar without saving for time, which is lost practice time playing
Or if I own valuable item that is more likely to go up than down, it makes no sense for me to sell it, unless I have something better to invest in.
Then again, it makes no sense for me to buy it either, if I don't have excess money to spend on it. If taking loan, the interest is sure, but rising value of said item is not.
18
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
@alexs.5871 Society can change, but we still have to abide the nature for our sustenance. It's not a choice, but necessity.
When you farm a land, you use up the nutrients in the soil. There's only three ways to continue farming.
1) Leave the patch to forest (takes 80 years), and burn new forest to ground for new field. (VERY bad for environment)
2) Rotate edibles and grasses to let the fields rest, and use mined, factory produced industrial fertilizers to revitalize the growth. (Also bad, and need at least 30 % more farmland to account for resting furrows, than our current agriculture)
3) Previous,, but use otherwise useless grassfields for animal fodder, and fertilize with tbeir waste which greatly reduces, the need for industrial fertilizers destructive to environment.
As a side extra, animal waste can, and is, also used to produce biofuels, before used as fertilizer.
PS wild pigs are almost as destructive to environment as 17th century humans, and cows or sheep can't even survive in nature, but will die suffering and wholly disappear without being cared.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
True story: There was a neighbour of ours, who I still remember from my childhood from 2000's before he died.
Back in early 1980's he left our small village in Finland to become a sailor. In his travels he had met some finnish/indians, and being the kind of person he is, he invited them to come visit him to Finland, when he gets back here.
Well, in 1990's, he returned, as his mental health wasn't quite right anymore. However, the indians came to visit, and they lived in the woods nearby his farmhouse through summer, as actual indians, leaving back wherever they had come when winter came.
The idea there were an actual indian camp by where I lived, if only for few months, still stuns me.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Worst desing offense of modern cars is, that they're mostly fake desing:
1. Old cars had chromed bumpers, then they switched to rubber and eventually plastic, making it look like part of body, so car doesn't actually have a bumper. Then they started to add fake pieces that look like partial bumper.
2) Chrome, wood and leather in cabin and/or outside. First these went mostly away one after another, then they started to add fake plastic pieces that look like those materials. Modern car interior are infested with those hideous plastic bits faking chrome.
3) Vents. Cars used to have vents for various reasons. Japanese cars had small chrome grilles in C pillar, one hid a fuel gap, other air vent for the cabin. If you have vent in 21st car, 9/10 times it's plastic piece with no purpose whatsoever.
4) Headlights. There are absolutely no reason to make their such a ridiculously massive, with complicated and weird shapes. They often look like fungi creeping over the cars face.
So much of modern cars desing is cheap and fake, making the whole car feel fake and pretentious trinket.
I have 2008 Kia Sportage mk II. One of the finest things about it is, there isn't anything pointless, or unnecessary in it. It's sturdy and solid, and while being cheap, it doesn't feel like that because it doesn't have a hundreds of cheap plastic bits and doohickeys over everywhere. Unlike mk3 Sportage for instance.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
What people defending the low taxation and "pay for what you need" don't get is, that they are actually defending big companies making ton of money from general public who really don't have a choice:
It's either that you pay heavily for healthcare when you need it, or you pay for insurance: First case your money goes to company providing healthcare service, second case it goes to insurance company. Companies are in it for profit so they take healty cut of 20 - 30 % for themselves.
Add in much higher wages for doctors and finance sector in US, that then flows to pay student loans, financing banking sector and universities, and you see the bigger picture.
Meanwhile in system like in Nordic countries government collects taxes, funds the healthcare system that is there to provide service, not to make profit, and can rely on cheaper, yet well educated workforce, that even with higher taxes live comfortably as they're not pushed down by massive loans from their education.
There is much more money going around in US system, and it's viable argument that it's good for economy, but that's complex and controversial topic of it's own.
Point is, in government run healthcare and education is much cheaper to provide, as well as being cheap for people to use.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@_Jake.From.Statefarm_ I'm not 100 % sure sure how it is in US, but here insurance prices have dropped massively, mainly due to foreign companies entering the market. Right now all my insurances cost around 1300 eur a year. Same contracts would have cost at least equivalent of 2500 -3500 eur 20 year ago.
Vehicles have been and still are massively expensive new here. But I drive 25 year old car that cost me 2000 eur, and it's far, far better than any new car would have been 40 years ago.
Healthcare I can't say anything about. Here we pay taxes for that, which have been on the rise. And sure wages have stagnated for the past 20 years.
BUT there's very obvious, very easy way to check how well we are today. Ask people 30-40 years older how things were. My father was born in house with no electricity or plumbing, and it wasn't because they we're poor, infrastructure simply wasn't yet there.
Of course it's all relative. It's different in different places and time. Truth is our generation is going to be poorer than previous, and it's mainly, because we're smaller in numbers. There's no helping in that, unless entire economic structure, which it almost has to...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There's good and there's bad in everything. Worker's unions really are only as good as people chosen to represent workers in them and in a way, larger those are better for everyone, as it makes them much less radical, even though more influential.
Most workers acknowledge that it's very important to keep the industry competitive. But some don't and they can grind the industries down in the long run.
Then there's the industrys side where they often do acknowledge the workers rights and are agreeable, but other times simply want to push whatever they can, and break unions, because they feel it's holding back their capacity.
In general, the biggest issue is when they just can't cooperate. That's when industry truly starts to fall. Biggest culprits, aside headstrong and overly proud representatives of either side, would be politicians and media who just can't take objective side, and keep fueling the argument rather than seeking solutions.
When they step in, it locks down the negotiation, when either side can't just give in a hair, because they fear they get the blame for any negative outcomes (never mind any positive they might succeed in. That doesn't sell).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheNewGreenIsBlue @TheNewGreenIsBlue I honestly don't understand this logic you apply to count imperial units: Divisions by quarter, 6,12,3 divisions, 9'er...what?
I've seen it before and it's obvious, when people think in imperial units, they think them in VERY different way than people who use metric. I really didn't understand how you we're counting the table leg lenghts. Or what was the point there.
In metric it's simple math: If I need 3 pieces of 74 cm legs. That's 3*74 = 222 cm or 2,22 m
Or If I have 5,24 m long piece of wood, I can get 524/74 = 6 legs and have 6 cm piece left over.
It's very easy to calculate in your head. With inches you always have to use decimals or fractions, but with metric you just move the decimal to keep it always in integers.
We don't think centimetre, desimetre or kilometre as different units. It's just a factor used to shorten and ease the calculations.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Even worse problem than disrupting social fabric with mass immigration is disrupting the society itself.
You know, population growth and wage was quite large point in the video. Then there's emerging cultural struggle, overcrowding of the cities (You know, it's the population centers people move in general. Not places suffering from emigration), and rising instability due to segregation of people.
Then there's an issue, that it's the ones more educated, and better off, who migrate in the first place. Creating wealth and resource vacuum for less developed areas.
And the social standpoint doesn't work either, because in large scope, even with mass migration scenario, it's very small minority that is helped in any way, and on average, wealth of people decline at least in short term.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sandrost4243 There's brilliant video about money printing and hyperinflation in dutch channel Money&Macro.
It's response video to Economics Explaineds hyperinflation video.
Couple of things, that I found super interesting we're data points and explanations regarding Covid19:
1) Fed hasn't printed nearly as much money people think, big part of it is from misconception on how the money circulating in economy is calculated
2) When comparing to any previous hyperinflation issues, in Covid19 the demand only fell, but industry and infrastructure is still there, and as we see, production is already back up.
I'm not saying some crash isn't coming, but I think it's not caused by Covid or actual debt itself. We can handle those.
It's either internal issues in EU or US, Russia doing something stupid, or any combination of those, that start it.
And tech bubble is bursting, with economy taking some hit, but lot of "boring" old industry sectors aren't that bubbly, so those will be fine in the end.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Everything is priced may be true for most liquid US stocks, but it is far from universal.
I've been trading in europe past year or so and honestly... It greatly varies stock by stock how quickly they adapt. When I follow the specific share price and news, I get the feel how it behaves to new information, I know when to trade.
Of course it only works for now. One has to constantly adapt to the market environment.
Like this one stock, I traded and made ~50 % profits through year, it was constantly going up on the moment positive news came up, rising couple of days, then falling back to new plateau 5-10 % higher than previous. It did that for like 5-7 times in a year, so easy pattern to follow.
Plus it was very good investment on the price it was trading anyway, so it would've been win even if I had predicted wrong.
Now it's overpriced, and I don't think it has much room to grow anyway for time being, so I'm out of it.
I have portfolio of about 5 similar stocks at the moment. Juss read a lot of news and follow the market that others don't, and you CAN find great opportunities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think I just saw the truth of options investing in practice:
NOK announced positive news about upcomung earnings, first stock rallied 5 %, then started to slide down rest of the week, ending much lower than it started.
Why?
I don't know for sure, but investigating, there's heavy load of call options expiring 21.1 of NOK at $6.
If I was to bet, there's going to be a lot of push to keep the price under that until they expire... And if that really is the case, how would you win with options, when "smart money" can control price like that? Sure call holders could have made money had they sold on top but I don't think many did...
I'm holding shares, btw, and buying more if this goes on this week.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheNewGreenIsBlue Music is based on fractions that use different base numbers. 1/2 is octave, 3/4 major third, 4/7 harmonic seventh etc... But those are not usually needed, since base 12 tet fixes them in to a scale. Which btw. Is chosen because it can represent most important notes the best with low amount of extra notes.
Base 19 would actually be much better, but practically difficult because of too many notes.
But more so, rhythm is in fractions. That's where I mostly need to use them.
Anyway I don't know why you insist on dividing things. This is why I think you think and understand things very differently than I do because of fractions.
I don't divide my day. I wake up at 6, start car at 7 commute 40 min. Work for 8,5 hours, pick groceries, that takes 30 min. Drive home 40 min. I'm there at 17:20 (If I calculated right). Put meat in oven, which takes 1,5 hours to cook. Put washing machine on that takes 2 h 25 min. Sit to watch 30 min. episode of something..
See that's a jumbled mess of decimals, hours and minutes. It took me quite a while to calculate in my head when I'm home and didn't even bother with evening because I think the point comes across.
If our math was just based on 12. Yes I fully agree it would be much easier.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1