Comments by "Vitaly L" (@vitalyl1327) on "Cameroon starts world-first malaria mass vaccine rollout | BBC News" video.

  1. It's an adjuvated protein-based. Next time avoid babbling about things you have no mental capacity to ever comprehend.
    5
  2. Do you really expect an ability to think from those morlocks?
    4
  3. It is an adjuvated protein-based jab. And you're not asking in a good faith, evidently.
    3
  4. ​ @juliesharp5077 look, this whole topic is so far beyond your cognitive capacity, you really should avoid having any opinions on it.
    3
  5.  @juliesharp5077  so, you, having zero knowledge whatsoever, decided that there are some "dangers", and now you will only listen to crackpots who confirm your bias? Great. This is exactly why I have nothing but contempt for your kind.
    3
  6.  @juliesharp5077  also, just for you yo gauge your own ability: you asked if this vaccine is based on mRNA. What does it tell everyone about you? That you failed to go to pubmed and read any of the reports, to find out that it is based on a protein fragment in a very standard and decades old adjuvant, with the protein itself being produced by a genetically modified yeast - just like, say, insulin, and a lot of other essential proteins, enzymes and such. Yet, you made up your mind long before you even had a chance to check the facts. Now, you're defering to an imaginable authority of the crackpot "scientists" who appeal to your biases, again, without even trying to gain any bit of a knowledge of your own. And then you cry "arrogance" and act surprised when treated with an utter contempt. Funny.
    3
  7.  @Armando_Hasanbelliu  did you get your immunology diploma from the Facebook University?
    3
  8.  @barneymagee3285  you clearly did not get brains, when they were distributed.
    3
  9. Usually cretins who ask such questions have no idea whatsoever what does "mRNA" mean, what vaccines are and how immunity work. It's an adjuvated CSP vaccine you dummy.
    2
  10.  @juliesharp5077  you have no idea what "genes" are, do you?
    2
  11.  @juliesharp5077  also, I have all reasons to be "arrogant". The intellectual gap between your kind and us, scientists, is immense and you'll never even be able to comprehend how impenetrable it is for you.
    2
  12.  @juliesharp5077  which word of "adjuvated protein-based" you failed to understand?
    2
  13.  @JohnofthefamilySmith  oh oh, an armchair immunologist in comments. Did you get your diploma from the Facebook University?
    2
  14.  @juliesharp5077  you're absolutely not in a position to assess scientists.
    2
  15.  @juliesharp5077  again, you failed to process a single word of what I said, and yet expect to be treared with respect, really? That's sad and pathetic. Just go and reflect on the depths of your ignorance.
    2
  16.  @benitosalazar3749  your pathetic comment is called "I have no idea what I babble about". You're deplorable.
    2
  17. Oh oh, this subhuman trash think it knows some "truth". Aren't you pathetic, filth?
    2
  18. Why don't you go there and get a malaria? Antivaxxers been a pestilence for far too long.
    2
  19. I bet you smoked your tinfoil hat, trash. Did not you know that you're simply supposed to wear it?
    2
  20.  @barneymagee3285  look you, trash, if you really think that your "University of Facebook" diploma means you're allowed to have opinions on topics so far above your pathetic cognitive capacity, think again.
    2
  21. Nobody cares about your opinion, filth.
    2
  22.  @benitosalazar3749  you really thing you said something insightful, dimwit? Hilarious.
    2
  23. You. You're a clear manifestation of what's wrong with the humanity - too much tolerance for the idiots and for ignorant trash. The worst problem of mankind is you lot.
    2
  24.  @Armando_Hasanbelliu  so you believe you're able to think "for yourself" when we, scientists, somehow cannot? Right. Tell me, in your own words, what's the function of MHC-I and MHC-II. Just for you to gauge your own ability to "think for yourself" and to assess the very basic level of understanding of immunology.
    2
  25. Ohhh, this pleb really think it just babbled something insightful. Aren't you pathetic, pleb trash?
    2
  26.  @juliesharp5077  oh oh, "a lot", how funny. You don't have a mental capacity to make any conclusions from any data, for you're far too low and ignorant. I'm a particle physicist without any pharma affiliation. The difference between your kind and my kind is that your lot is terminally ignorant and have zero knowledge on anything whatsoever, and my kind is so far above yours that you have no chance to ever comprehend the size of this chasm. Get over it. Know your place. You have no idea what proteins are, what "genes" are, what RNA is, how it all works, and what adaptive immune system is. Yet you dare to babble utter nonsense involving all those words.
    1
  27.  @juliesharp5077  nope, you very evidently don't know anything at all, all your comments prove it. Let me repeat again - it's an adjuvated protein-based vaccine. I know you did not understand a single word of this definition, but you can try learning a bit of fundamentals. Come back in 3 years and try to understand it again.
    1
  28.  @juliesharp5077  so hilarious that a worthless nobody like you is convinced that it is right. Behold, people, this is what an average antivaxxer look like: ignorant, dim and pathetic.
    1
  29.  @juliesharp5077  and the funny part here is that you'll never even have a chance to understand how low and dim you are.
    1
  30.  @juliesharp5077  again, what word did you fail to understand? You're too dumb and ignorant to talk about vaccines. Accept this fact and stop.embarrassing youself.
    1
  31. ​ @juliesharp5077  you're not in a position to assess scientists, for you're too low and ignorant.
    1
  32.  @juliesharp5077  you would not know what science is even if it bites your arse, so why do you think something as pathetic as you are have a right to babble about science?
    1
  33.  @juliesharp5077  again, you are not in a position to assess scientists. They are trash and were always crackpots. But for lowlife like you someone in a lab coat and speaking in smart words is already a "scientist". For you, someone like malone is a "scientist". For any educated person he is a clown.
    1
  34.  @juliesharp5077  the difference between scientists and trash is very simple. Scientists follow the Scientific Method, exclusively. Crackpots don't follow the Scientific Method. But for someone like you, who have no idea what scientific method is, there is no way to tell one from another.
    1
  35.  @juliesharp5077  nope. Politeness does not work with your kind. You're outside of the scope of the rules of civilised society. You forsaken the very basis of our civilisation, you forsaken the Scientific Method, you decided to ignore facts and reason, and you assumed a system of beliefs that is outright murderous. You're an enemy of humanity. Why would anyone be polite with someone so deplorable?
    1
  36.  @jujucalabar9732  it is not a valid concern whatsoever - people who are so afraid of anything mRNA are misguided and do not understand anything at all. There is no "aftermath" whatsoever, despite what grifters try to tell you. Covid vaccination was a massive success, despite even short-living antibody count and rapidly mutating target.
    1
  37.  @jujucalabar9732  what "aftermath" you're talking about? You're very lax with facts, evidently.
    1
  38.  @JohnofthefamilySmith  do you really believe that you just mumbled something smart and valuable, pleb? You have a massively overblown ego, you fail to comprehend how worthless and low you are.
    1
  39.  @briansmith8490  hilarious that you believe you're "people". Your kind deserve no right to be considered human beings, antivaxxers are nothing but filthy morlocks.
    1
  40.  @briansmith8490  antivaxxers are not "people" and deserve nothing but utter contempt.
    1
  41. Stop calling them "people", antivaxxers do not deserve to be counted as human beings.
    1
  42.  @Denise-ux4xd  found an antivaxxer. You're deplorable, antivaxxer.
    1
  43. Half a million deaths every year you piece of dung.
    1
  44.  @briansmith8490  you, trash, who cares about BBC and other media for plebs when there is a scientific consensus?
    1
  45. Yes, right, you giga-brain, they should have tested in the first-world countries instead. Wait a sec, there's no malaria there, dimwit.
    1
  46.  @signsofplay  I gather you're talking about your personal experience? There's no scum dumber than the antivaxxers.
    1
  47.  @scott83gmail  stop lying
    1
  48.  @Armando_Hasanbelliu  look. I'm a scientist. You're a nobody, uneducated and dim. See the difference? Who cares about "mainstream media" when we have facts and reason?
    1
  49.  @Armando_Hasanbelliu  these are all words indeed, but they do not make any sense, unless your goal was to prepare some fusion-style word salad. You clearly do not understand what autoimmune diseases are and what causes them. Ever had an allergy to pollen in some place new to you? This is what a "dirty" environment does. Immune system is far from ideal and glitches all the time. Vaccines are designed the way they do not trigger such glitches, while pretty much anything else in the environment can.
    1
  50.  @Armando_Hasanbelliu  my comments keep disappearing. Again: your understanding of the causes of autoimmune response is wrong. I recommend you to learn at least some basics before having opinions on such complex topics.
    1
  51.  @Armando_Hasanbelliu  because there is no rise in unexplainable excess deaths. You should not listen to the grifters. There is a very important rule everyone must follow - avoid having opinions on topics you do not understand through and through. Avoid repeating opinions of people who appeal to your feelings instead of your knowledge and reason.
    1
  52. let's hope you never write a single comment again, with your single-digit IQ you really should not.
    1
  53.  @mickpeterson3722  ROTF, an uneducated nobody like you dares to think it have mental capacity to assess who is right? You're pathetic. Know your place, nobody, when you're talking to scientists.
    1
  54.  @mickpeterson3722  antivaxxers are never right, they are the lowest of the low, the most dumb and deranged of the human waste.
    1