Comments by "Vitaly L" (@vitalyl1327) on "Sadiq Khan Loses 90% Of His New ULEZ Cameras" video.

  1. Hope all vandals will end up jailed.
    3
  2.  @bobbailey7024  scheme is far from perfect and is hopefully just a first step towards pricing out everyone from driving. Stilp better than nothing.
    2
  3. Londoners want to breathe. Motorists should get rekt.
    1
  4.  @Cyborg647  freedom to pollute? Nope. Your freedom ends where other people rights start. And everyone have a basic right for breathing non-toxic air.
    1
  5.  @eliaspanayi3465  another dimwit spreading nonsese. Did you read the paper you're referring to, dimwit? Tube air got high concentration of metal oxide nanoparticles. Their health impact is unknown but is not expected to be serious. Now, nitrooxides are known to be devastating, and concentration is far beyond healthy in central London.
    1
  6.  @jimp1646  another dimwit who misinterpreted the paper on metal oxide nanoparticles?
    1
  7.  @SpareSomeChange8080  nope, I'll better slit tires of polluters
    1
  8.  @BadlydrawnBen  lol, gammon filth fancy themselves "freedom fighters". Worthless subhuman trash at most.
    1
  9.  @SpareSomeChange8080  get rekt, gammon
    1
  10.  @kevindavies2406  another dimwit who misinterpreted the paper. You're pathetic
    1
  11.  @EstradaDuran-sg6co  gammon pig. You stink, gammon
    1
  12.  @icelara5972  prove it, dimwit. Metal oxide particles are not nearly as bad as NO2
    1
  13.  @MDM1992  oh oh, big bad man, do you realise how pathetic you are, you and all the other car lovers? You stink, pig.
    1
  14.  @megaduck7965  do you think that an uneducated primitive dimwit like you even can "argue" about anything at all? You're hardly a human being to start with.
    1
  15.  @Insecthouse  why did you smoke your tinfoil hat, dimwit? You were supposed to merely wear it.
    1
  16.  @karenyoung8341  it is an incentive for people to review their car habit. Did you want polluting cars to be banned straight away? Just imagine the stench gammon would have put up then.
    1
  17.  @roertclay768  I imagine how you gammons would have thrown a fit if polluting cars were outright banned. Punishing with a tax will result in a significant reduction of the number of polluters, which is still much better than nothing.
    1
  18.  @DJ_Skie  even including Greater London, majority support ULEZ, and rightfully so.
    1
  19.  @DJ_Skie  CFD simulations clearly show that any smaller coverage won't fix the pollution in the centre. Curse of any large city.
    1
  20.  @magpies77  it did, trash. You must stop spreading misinformation, trash.
    1
  21.  @thewaronu8842  half of the tinfoil hat mythology in one comment! You dimwits are all so prefictable, so utterly pathetic. Tell me, dimwit, are you able to tie your own shoe laces? I very much doubt you can.
    1
  22. ​ @thewaronu8842  oh, a keyboard warrior. Would have been so.funny to see you sent to prison for vandalising ULEZ infrastructure.
    1
  23. Majority of Londoners support ULEZ. You gammon vandals go against democracy and will suffer the consequences.
    1
  24.  @lawrenceholden5716  troll? Wanting a clean air makes me a troll? Get rekt, polkuting filth.
    1
  25.  @tomwinterbourne  sure, if any of those who caused damage were caught.
    1
  26. You mean, tiny but loud minority of gammon scum protesting against (checking my notes...), what, clean air? Screw them. Gammons are deplorable.
    1