Comments by "Vitaly L" (@vitalyl1327) on "Mayor of London Sadiq Khan casts vote in local election" video.

  1. Nobody cares about your scummy opinion, gammon.
    1
  2. Only the most deplorable of the human waste oppose ULEZ. All the decent human beings support ULEZ absolutely.
    1
  3. ​ @harbzsquadings2277 what's wrong with ULEZ?
    1
  4.  @harbzsquadings2277  yes, please, do not get started, as you're not mentally equipped to produce any coherent argument anyway. It is an envirinmental measure that objectively work (and I personally see the results, living in an NOx hot spot). The only real problem with ULEZ is that it is too little, too late.
    1
  5.  @harbzsquadings2277  NOx readings from the air monitoring stations all over London are publically available. Go an check them out, the results are obvious and as official as it gets - just raw data with no interpretation loaded on top.
    1
  6.  @harbzsquadings2277  what TFL stats?!? Go and see the raw NOx readings from the air monitoring stations, they're available. And you're clearly out of your depth. Once again, I live in an NOx hot spot. It means, concentration here is quite a bit above the healthy level. People with asthma flee the area very soon after they moved in. And there are hundreds of hot spots like this. And it's not in Zone 1, not 2, not even 3. Motorists are the scourge of this city, and any measure that reduce their numbers is justified. Stop babbling about the "working men pockets", most of those working men never needed cars to begin with.
    1
  7.  @harbzsquadings2277  I'm not forgetting about tradesmen, and I have zero sympathy for tradesmen who cut corners. Having an old non-compliant van is cutting corners indeed, and I hope they will be kicked out of the trade naturally. Readings are fairly consistent and well calibrated, NOx partials are very easy to detect and measure, just go and read the public stations data, historic and recent. Same goes for the particulate pollution (but it was not even a goal for ULEZ, it is specifically limited to NOx).
    1
  8.  @harbzsquadings2277  what kind of a deranged excuse is this? Cannot afford being a tradesman - don't be a tradesman. Easy. Cutting corners is never acceptable. With your logic, drug dealers are also hard working men who are being unfairly screwed up by the government. After all, they're just earning money to pay bills, amirite?
    1
  9.  @harbzsquadings2277  anyway, you get the reasoning - having to earn a living is not an excuse for doing scummy things, like dealing drugs or driving an old polluting van.
    1
  10.  @harbzsquadings2277  the same logic: if people cannot afford to.get any education, to get any useful skills, it is not scummy to deal drugs then. Right? Not being able to afford tools for a job bars you from this job, period. Find something else to do. Why should anyone make concessions for you?
    1
  11. You're a gammon. Gammons have no right to have opinions.
    1
  12. Show me on a doll where did ULEZ hurt you.
    1
  13. Get rekt, gammon. All the decent Londoners vote for Khan.
    1
  14. Comments are always so gammon-infested here
    1