General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Guff
BBC
comments
Comments by "Guff" (@guff9567) on "The Powerful Mrs. Coulter | His Dark Materials - BBC" video.
I hate this TV series, as it perpetuates the abuse of animals by human beings.
4
@oranjmusemeyer968 use an effigy of a table or chair. Not an animal.
1
@dogthatdrives it is against Sharia Law to represent humans as animals. I said that because Brigade 77 deleted my earlier response to you. Clearly CGHQ hate animals just as much as other fans of this series.
1
@sadeghfiroozi7791 @sadeghfiroozi7791 You misunderstand my dear brother. The idea of portraying them as animals is demeaning to the animals, as the animals theirselves have not offered their signed consent. It is like the white-skin-coloured Dutch people blacking-up as Black Piet for St Nicholas Day celebrations. 'Tis offensive. And I'm sure the 10,000,000 tortured and murdered Germans, during the reigh of Hilter, would disagree with you on the issue of the acceptability of pain and abuse.
1
Well, BBC censors, I suppose too that what Mr Hilter did to 10,000,000 non-christians in the 1930s and 1940s is not wicked either?
1
BBC censors only want to self congratulate their selves on this evil production abusing animals, and delete any public debate on the morality of the abuse of animals, and that it is this abuse of animals that spreads cvd.
1
BBC and their Brigade 77 censors at it again, deleting public debate.
1
@ce1834 stay off the acid tabs mate. Nobody here has a "vendetta" against the BBC. Just, some people have feelings and empathy for real animals.
1
@ce1834 So anybody who is concerned at all about censorship is on acid? God in heaven will see to the producers. As He has done to all past animal exploiters by creating TB, smallpox, measles, cvd, etc.
1
@221BSam I layeth not, but fight the Good fight.
1
@weltschmertzz and, by effigy of the animal, the rights of the animal in the conscience of the viewer.
1
@PetsWithFurryPaws How would you like it if someone took your photo, without your permission, and made you do fake things with it, and plastered it all over the world?
1
@Moon0525_ FOOL: 1) The imagery is of animals, not humans 2) No animal gave it's permission for it's image to be abused in this way.
1
@Moon0525_ You utter mug. It's just your usual evil humans exploiting animals is a blase manner.
1