Comments by "Jorge carrejo" (@jorgecarrejo7562) on "JUST IN: Anna Paulina Luna Introduces Motion To Hold AG Merrick Garland In Inherent Contempt" video.

  1.  @KimCoughlin-n5n  because he knows what executive priveledge is
    3
  2.  @RJMachine62  this has nothing to do with the special counsel
    3
  3. He didn't break the law..Bannon and Navarro did..
    2
  4. Never. Executive priveledge exists
    1
  5.  @RJMachine62  the loonies aren't trying to arrest Garland over a special counsel.. They are trying to get tapes of the President.. Which he invoked executive priveledge..
    1
  6. Garland didn't break the law
    1
  7.  @JD-ir2sb  jury of his peers disagrees with you Bannon didn't have executive priveledge
    1
  8.  @JD-ir2sb  this isn't a court of law.. Potus decides when to invoke executive priveledge
    1
  9. Because he didn't break the law
    1
  10. No
    1
  11. You should fire them and nominate people like Dr oz and hershel
    1