Comments by "" (@shamrock141) on "" video.

  1. That sounds like the beginning of a dictatorship
    3
  2. I'm pretty sure police openly firing on protests and riots would create a hell of a lot more "living in fear"
    3
  3. Says the guy who can't spell out a sentence correctly
    3
  4. They're banned weapons, it's a war crime to use them on people
    2
  5.  @buisyman  what makes you think sam is fascist?
    1
  6.  @buisyman  sam is the narrator
    1
  7. A valid point but is it right to show said history in the form of valiant public works or should it be kept in books and museums? Most importantly though should communities have the right to vote on whether to keep or remove their local public works like statues
    1
  8. There's your bias as well
    1
  9.  @Alex14Wolf  you're a hypocrite 🤣
    1
  10.  @Alex14Wolf  wrong again, I'm not a leftist and interesting how you deflect by trying to attack other people instead of actually addressing your bias
    1
  11. Elaborate then
    1
  12. Because the government is supposed to act in the best interests of the people. Killing protestors, even if they are violent, is not the best course of action
    1
  13.  @Ray_Shabaz  during Charlottesville only 8 people were arrested and all those people were attacking police
    1
  14.  @Ray_Shabaz  a good point, I just don't see how the police can reasonably intervene more so than they do now without coming across as authoritarian, especially given their current reputation
    1
  15. Pretty sure the most accurate description is they attacked each other
    1
  16.  @Fred_uyz  typical that you have a victim complex
    1
  17.  @Fred_uyz  I see you neglected to mention that the only civilian who died in that riot was a counterprotester
    1
  18.  @Fred_uyz  you stated the counterprotesters initiated the violence and almost every single person hurt afterwards was from the right yet you neglect to mention the only civilian casualty was a counterprotestor and that the protestors brought weapons including rifles with them which clearly shows prediction of violance, also last time I checked there were several videos of protestors and counterprotestors alike instigating violence so your whole premise that the counter protestors werebillegalyl initiating violence is frankly bullshit Additionally whataboutism is an effective arguement when presented with a hypocritical claim such as yours. You claim the right was the victim here, even though they carried weapons, engaged with riot police, fought with counterprotestors, killed one them in a car hit etc. There is no distinguishment between protestors and counter protestors in terms of actions at this rally hence your claim is hypocritical
    1
  19.  @Fred_uyz  yes violence and injury erupted from both sides resulting in terrible consequences but in my eyes neither were innocent. I can't in good faith defend the actions of the counterprotestors but I know that the original protestors were just as violent
    1
  20. Well this aged like milk
    1
  21. That sounds like the introduction to a dictatorship
    1
  22. Semi-automatic firearms with detachable magazines
    1
  23. Show your research then if you're calling it fact
    1
  24. The guy at 8:40 is literally carrying a rifle
    1
  25.  @biggy1168  The definition of assault weapon according to federal and state law refers to primarily semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon Hence yes an AR-15 definitely fits the description of an assault weapon. I suggest you know what you're talking about before opening opening your mouth
    1
  26. Yeah they were, hell they called the riot "unite the right"
    1