Comments by "" (@shamrock141) on "Taylor Swift AI P*rn Floods Social Media" video.

  1. Imo you shouldn't have the freedom to create photo realistic fake images of people for the purposes of humiliating or defaming them. Your freedom of expression ends where someone else's rights begin
    2
  2. It's not just that, verifying an image's authenticity requires someone knowledgeable in the industry to notice and authenticate the image, which will become more difficult as millions more people get their hands on and start using the tools as well as the continued advancement of AI imagery
    2
  3. "disproportionately impacts women" That is factually correct you muppet
    1
  4. When people are committing suicide and thousands of minors are being sexually exploited that generally is a problem
    1
  5.  @lwhack458  I think for now the line with AI should be no nudity, it's simply too easy to abuse and there isn't a justifiable reason it should exist. That way governments can't pick and choose cases and the line is clearly drawn with no wiggle room for exploitation. We're already seeing drastic cases of underage girls being portrayed with nsfw digital imagery, real and fake, in South Korea so much so that it's become front page news
    1
  6. Not like this, AI puts the tools in millions more hands and the photos have become drastically more realistic and difficult to distinguish. And yes this is an issue that dramatically affects more girls than boys, that shouldn't mean that it's all of a sudden politically convenient or inconvenient to address it
    1
  7.  @TheCutiePatrol  like I've already said, AI puts the tools in millions more hands. Before when you needed time and skill, now if not soon all you need is a subscription and a prompt. Photo shopping a head onto another body is easy to tell apart, skin tone variations, body proportion irregularities, stock image duplicates. AI creates entirely customisable images that are becoming increasingly difficult to tell apart and the rate at which this technology has developed is staggering
    1
  8. That relies on people knowledgeable in the industry to continue being able to tell AI and authentic images apart, it also doesn't matter much if it accomplishes the objective of destroying someone's reputation or self-esteem
    1
  9. Hard disagree, this problem is only going to become more exacerbated as time goes on. AI continues to get better and better at creating photo realistic images, soon if not now, all it will take to create a near perfect replica of your body will be a social media presence. More and more people won't be able to distinguish between real and fake, this is already a noticeable trend in older generations and the potential to hurt people's reputations, or images is astronomical
    1
  10. Photoshop was always easier to tell apart and was far less accessible due people needing the time and knowledge to use it. AI is far more accessible, in the range of millions, and all it takes is a couple prompts to create photo realistic, humiliating imagery. It's both more accessible and more dangerous and the victims are becoming more and more high school girls being targeted by their peers
    1
  11. The problem is AI, it's getting uncannily good at creating photo realistic images. Soon it won't matter if the image is authentic, because it will be able to ascertain your body proportions from just a social media presence alone and make a nearly indistinguishable fabrication. Do you think high schoolers are going to care if the image is real if it makes a near perfect guess?
    1
  12. The issue is two fold, firstly photoshop requires time and effort whereas AI is accessible to millions more people and all it requires is a prompt and a subscription. Secondly AI is a lot better at creating realistic, indistinguishable images than photoshop. The result is going to be a boom of people being able to use nothing more than a social media presence of their victim to create humiliating or pornographic imagery of them
    1
  13. It's not the same thing, AI is both far more accessible and convenient, but also realistic and indistinguishable from real imagery. The leaps it's made in the past 10 years make Photoshop look like Microsoft paint
    1
  14. Jesus Christ how miserable of a person are you? She was a child who had photo realistic porn of her body shared throughout her school, have you not considered what that does to a girl's mental state
    1
  15. ...yes that's how a representative democracy works, you vote in the people who make the laws
    1
  16. That is factually untrue, and you know what, banning AI from creating nsfw imagery of people is probably a good idea
    1
  17.  @HamguyBacon  we do, you've never heard of defamation law before?
    1
  18. Yes, like Grok-1 having safeguards that protect against nude imagery, unfortunately it looks like that will be repealed in Grok-2
    1
  19. It's called statistics, this issue does predominantly affect women, since most of the misuse is going into generating fake pornographic images
    1
  20. It affects mostly women, as they're the prime target for sexualised pornographic content
    1