Comments by "GodsOwnPrototype" (@GodsOwnPrototype) on "Government hypocrisy u0026 the limits of 'white privilege' - The Week in 60 Minutes | SpectatorTV" video.

Since New Labour went trawling for peoples to bring, (many of them seemingly with ethnic grievances against Britain), the Tories have brought in even more every year than Blair did. Traitors seem the majority in most parties on both sides of the aisle. Most indigenous British women report as wanting several children but the realities of housing and living costs, crime levels and social atomisation and most of their educational and media indoctrination pushing them to spend the majority of their childbearing years avoiding motherhood and building their own families to instead give those years and their efforts to a corporation instead; throw in white guilt, feminist misandry, climate change future doom, and the general downer on Britons as Britons and their history and culture then it’s little surprise the birth rates collapsed except among the most religious of us who are fecund on principle and those in the underclass who are incentivised with housing and financial subsidy to have them.
13
We now have a hybrid ethnic-class system in which Native Britons of the wrong breeding & performative class are at the very bottom & made the whipping boys for the mistakes & failings of both the power elite as a class & other ethnic peoples. We are in a position in this country where Native Indigenous English people, in England are banned by law, power elite & corporate social taboo, from freely expressing themselves in their mother tongue because of the opinions of people of foreign extraction who reserve for themselves use of the same words and phrases in English amongst themselves, around native English people and in their media broadcast to all, that they insist native English people and other Britons cannot themselves use. The English are already a Minority of Live Births in England & all Native Britons will also be later this decade by 2027. The English will become an Absolute Minority in England within 30years around mid century and all Native Britons of the UK will be made an Absolute Minority within 50 years by 2066. We are supposed to be a Democracy and yet the greatest and most rapid Demographic changes in over three millennia are being imposed by policies that were never proposed to the people let alone received a mandate to occur: We Were Never Asked. Anyone who loves this country, be they Indigenous or of Foreign Extraction, would seek to preserve it’s Native people’s Demographic & Cultural hegemony in our Neighbourhoods, Towns, Cities, Counties, Regions, Nations & Country. That our own institutions actively discriminate against us, (especially media & educational ones) both overtly and covertly, let alone that they don't support especially, (as should be our right from our own institutions founded by our own ancestors in our own homeland), is symptomatic of so much.
7
We Were Never Asked
4
@leigh-mariehamilton3361 Being white isn't just skin colour, it's the signifier of a heritage of a distinct population going back many thousands of years. I agree that the current use of the phrase 'White Privilege' is idiotic,malicious and even mostly nonsensical but that does not mean that combination of words cannot convey something true. It's too easy to dismiss ones opponents at the slightest mistake of theirs, rather than steel man their positions and grapple with them. I generally support Free Speech because I want to explore ideas and different ways of seeing the world as a means of expanding and improving. I recommend it.
4
@barkerk100 If 'it was ever thus' is the guiding morality and principle of procedure then rape, theft, expulsions, murderous massacres, genocide and ethnic cleansing are valid responses to what is happening in order to preserve their own. A fairer, more civilised and less violent set of solutions is still possible but only possible if applied within the lifetimes of the currently living. The issue is not that foreign peoples come here, even en masse, the problem is that the same people stay and presume equal or superior claim to the land and country and treatment from its institutions. 50x the current and recent number of peoples with no indigenous heritage could come, so long as they all each left after 3-5 years.
3
@adtastic1533 Incentives. We live longer and work longer but a woman's fertile years are still teens to early thirties. If part time education for women with better on site childcare were ubiquitous then you could make a hybrid life more feasible and it would alleviate the issues of working women taking expensive maternity leave. Motherhood mainly just needs to be valued again by wider society and more especially women themselves.
3
@gtully40 No worries; that's a virtue rarely seen online. Thank you. & your point is also well made, the roots of this madness predated Blair also.
3
I think like a lot of false things there is a grain of truth in it. To be the bio-cultural beneficiaries of people who explored, codified, conquered most of the world and invented most things as ones heritage is a privilege. I'll agree that not all white peoples have a close or as legitimate claim to such things as others but plausible claims can still be made compared to those are not white. When one is of majority black African heritage the claims one can make of the achievements of one people are far fewer and the wealth of ones heritage is far less. Therefore the impact of ones people's ways of doing things on the world around us varies, from language, to fashion, to social norms and as there is a biological root to those things, of varying continual significance, they are more or less natural to us depending on that. Individualists can pooh-pooh this all as baseless collectivism and declare that one has no claim to the achievements of another person but this is a fantasy of the realities of human relationships. We are all creations of a biological collective collaboration, born in a symbiotic dependency and the social inputs of language and most else are collectively held and developed. When it comes to Individualists and Collectivism, if one is at all realistic, one holds a Both/And position and what matters is the configuration.
3
@pauljamessquibbs.3945 SMH 'no genetic basis to 'racial groups", could you say anything more driven by abstract ideology & so disconnected from empirical reality?! That the differences between the Australian Aborigines, the Aymara, Pygmy Bushmen, the Masai, the Dravidians, the Japanese and the Icelandic have no genetic basis but are a product of environmental factors coming to bear after conception is absurd. One could quibble over how coarse or fine-grained one wants to make the criteria for general demarcation but the superclusters are evident in the data just as much as the finer ethnic or even individual differences and associations are. Don't make me laugh by bringing up melanin as if that is the most significant thing, like there aren't Bantu Albinos or Welshmen that tan as dark as an Arab or Japanese that are paler than some Russians. I understand that for many human traits, especially the higher ones, there's an intertwining of the socialisation & the biology and that there are venn overlaps between all the populations on many if not most traits & that the same goes for innate and socially acquired advantages. None of this refutes the basic point being made about reality.
3
@pauljamessquibbs.3945 @LateNight Live I know that in modern parlance they are not the same, (although for most of history they were synonymous), just as I know that only very modern simpletons think of race as punctuated categories on a spectrum of skin colour from white to black. You have sidestepped the key points here. One can't say that there's no genetic basis for race, whilst also claiming that Pygmies and Aboriginals are the same race when they are considered to be among the most genetically distant from each other.
3
Once the government inserts itself into an area of the economy, dictating standards for safety etc. it makes itself ultimately responsible for the outcomes and if it turns out the standards met by actors in that area of the economy in good faith are insufficient the government remains responsible and should foot the bill. I understand that this falls upon taxpayers as a whole but so does the cost of millions of pounds given to other countries that have space programs or to subsidise the creation & career of girl bands and to support jobsworths and insidious bad actors in our bloated public sector.
2
@adtastic1533 Sure, low crime rates, high levels of civility, employment and innovation, super efficient infrastructure and a burgeoning automation and robotics sector, ethnically homogenous with a strong proud culture -who would want that? In any case, because of the position of The City in Global Financial infrastructure we would never have to be in the economic situation of Japan. Also, if priority was rationally given to peoples with majority or partial ethnic heritage as Britons and then temperament, values and ability compatibility after that, if Britain had taken a more Japanese path we would be attracting back people with a connection to this country from around the world, rather than shedding them because it's increasingly self hating and destroying it's culture and heritage as well as it's indigenous demographic roots. The wind was sown and we are reaping the whirlwind.
2
@danniwilder2198 Yeah sorry, wrote that in a rush whilst distracted. Should read better now with the typos & 'autocorrects' etc. amended.
2
@murraymcgregor7829 This begs a big question.
2
@gtully40 You may wish to reread my comment as it seems you may have missed my point.
1
@pauljamessquibbs.3945 You seem to insist on this melanin based strawman of race to argue against rather than the clustering of peoples with certain differentiating traits due to prehistoric admixtures of different human species and long geographical isolation in which further distinctions have developed within specific populations. You know that variation argument is called Lewontin's Fallacy because it's application dissolves numerous categories of speciation distinction in other areas of the animal kingdom. Ethnicity is mixed up with race due to historical linguistic reasons and the evolution of both that language and the ideas associated as the life science fields that impact biological anthropology developed. That the concept of race, (and it's various categorisations over time) has developed as a tight knot of biological and sociological points of significance means that it cannot be said to be only based upon biological genetic factors or sociological ones. However, that an individual that is not already biologically mixed and so ambiguously one or the other cannot change race, (and in the prior example can only between the ones that are their heritage), proves this is not sociological and does so on sociological terms in any case.
1