Comments by "Icetea 2000" (@Icetea-2000) on ""sexual harassment is fine as long as it's a woman doing it" (Suicide Squad)" video.
-
25
-
20
-
14
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@Derael That’s pretty assuming don’t you think.
I take it you’re a woman right? And even if you’re not, how can you possibly say that men just find harassment less serious than women? That’s up to everyone to decide themselves.
NO, YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE BECAUSE OF THE BEHAVIOR ITSELF, NOT BECAUSE OF THE RECIPIENT!!
Do you even know what you’re saying right now? You’re essentially saying that if someone was r*ped and abducted and then has stockholm syndrome and tells the authorities that it’s fine, that that means the person didn’t commit a crime. No, that’s not how it works.
You can’t just afterwards see if someone is fine with something, you have to know beforehand.
You’re so unbelievably sexist it’s honestly astonishing. You’re saying that men don’t mind being sexually harassed or even like it, you’re pushing an extremely old narrative that falls into the same vein as "a boy cannot have been r*ped if he got an erection" even though that has been proven to be an entirely physical response, just like a woman getting wet doesn’t mean she liked to be r*ped. You’re being so assuming of what other men would think like without a care in the world for their feelings, while adamantly defending the feelings of women, it’s disgusting.
You are just filled with doubke standards, YOU are the problem, you need to take a look at yourself and think about what you’re doing
1
-
@Derael That’s pretty assuming don’t you think.
I take it you’re a woman right? And even if you’re not, how can you possibly say that men just find harassment less serious than women? That’s up to everyone to decide themselves.
NO, YOU ARE AN A HOLE BECAUSE OF THE BEHAVIOR ITSELF, NOT BECAUSE OF THE RECIPIENT!!
Do you even know what you’re saying right now? You’re essentially saying that if someone was r*ped and abducted and then has stockholm syndrome and tells the authorities that it’s fine, that that means the person didn’t commit a crime. No, that’s not how it works.
You can’t just afterwards see if someone is fine with something, you have to know beforehand.
You’re so unbelievably sex1st it’s honestly astonishing. You’re saying that men don’t mind being sexually harassed or even like it, you’re pushing an extremely old narrative that falls into the same vein as "a boy cannot have been r*ped if he got an erection" even though that has been proven to be an entirely physical response, just like a woman getting wet doesn’t mean she liked to be r*ped. You’re being so assuming of what other men would think like without a care in the world for their feelings, while adamantly defending the feelings of women, it’s disgusting.
You are just filled with double standards, YOU are the problem, you need to take a look at yourself and think about what you’re doing
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Derael "I don’t get to dictate how men feel" followed by "I am just making a generalization for all men" Buddy, you can’t honestly be this dense.
How is the male status being abused for power? If you loudly proclaim you’re being harassed by that woman either people will find you weird, laugh at you, the woman will turn it around like you’re the problem, or all of them.
But here’s the thing, what do norms and generalizations do when reality is much more complicated than that? Everyone is going to have their own different experiences, so you can’t just say that men take it less seriously, that just diminishes the severity of those that had those experiences and didn’t like it.
The stakes aren’t any higher, you’re not going to get r*ped in a public club, that’s what I mean, women being seen as more vulnerable makes them much more protected like you’re proving right now, which goes around to taking the opposite less seriously like you’re doing right now.
You’re confusing what is considered as "normal" behavior as morally right behavior. The only reason we consider it normal is because of our gender biases.
It is "okay" because women are typically not treated as seriously as men, like how fights between two women are referred to as "catfights" because to other men it’s hilarious and adorable because they’re much stronger. However, this leads to women being able to go all out when fighting a man, and even when they do injure the man more than they got injured, the man is seen as the villain, even if he was holding back and even if she started it. That’s what I mean with exploitation of the victim status, it’s just your own impression that is somewhat founded in reality, but goes too far to actually be unfair even if we keep the strength difference between men and women in mind.
So no, there is no "default acceptable sexual harassment", it’s always wrong.
You’re saying women are just free to sexually harass a man when there hasn’t been any boundaries set prior, and only afterwards do they have to back off, that’s so sexist. Just because men generally don’t treat them as seriously in your mind, that can only lead to bad situations where a man is taken advantage of for that very notion. No, women shouldn’t be conditioned to just initiate sexual harassment, and you are actively trying to justify it which is disgusting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Derael I think I would very much be afraid of getting sexually assaulted by her what the hell do you mean??? She’s an expert hand to hand combatant, are you STILL saying I would be the one with more power there and therefore shouldn’t have to complain about sexual harassment?
Also, you’re ignoring a very crucial side of this that I want you to think about. Men’s stronger physical strength on average doesn’t make things relating to sexual harassment/assault better but worse for the man most of the time. Let me explain:
Yeah a man might be able to overpower a woman most of the time when they’re alone, but anything with anyone in sight would immediately be noticed by others around them and get the man jumped on by half a dozen guys. Think about a typical scenario, a bar or club or something, men’s physical strength and the belief that they’re stronger is a huge negative, as they are constantly scared how far they can go because one second of the girl telling everyone you’re harassing means you’ll get your head bashed in.
It’s a case of our innate desire to root for the underdog, and our primal instincts are that someone physically weaker is the underdog even though in our modern society there are plenty of different ways to get power. In no social environment with a bunch of people do women have less power, in fact it’s the opposite by everyone immediately siding with them if they choose to confront someone.
A man is practically helpless against a woman because what can he do when she sexually harasses him even if she’s weaker? If she yells and tells everyone around you you’re a creep to her, you’ll have your face punched in by other guys. It’s not like you can use your physical strength in any way to get ahead in that situation, in fact it works as a downside in social environments.
A woman can also always use their full strength to assault a man, and a man can’t back. It goes back to women not being taken seriously in their strength, like how women on women fights are called "catfights" because it’s seen as cute and unthreatening as two cats fighting another. That’s not really always the case though, a woman can injure a man far more than a man can back, even if he is already holding back, because a man is "supposed to take it like a man".
If that’s not sexism against men I don’t know what is. Due to our nature of rooting for the underdog we always see women as inherently more vulnerable without realizing that this cavemen level of thinking doesn’t really hold true in the modern world and that women actually hold more power in those situations by being able to rally the support of anyone around her against a man if she so chooses to.
1
-
@Derael I think I would very much be afraid of getting sexually assaulted by her what the hell do you mean??? She’s an expert hand to hand combatant, are you STILL saying I would be the one with more power there and therefore shouldn’t have to complain about sexual harassment?
Also, you’re ignoring a very crucial side of this that I want you to think about. Men’s stronger physical strength on average doesn’t make things relating to sexual harassment/assault better but worse for the man most of the time. Let me explain:
Yeah a man might be able to overpower a woman most of the time when they’re alone, but anything with anyone in sight would immediately be noticed by others around them and get the man jumped on by half a dozen guys. Think about a typical scenario, a bar or club or something, men’s physical strength and the belief that they’re stronger is a huge negative, as they are constantly scared how far they can go because one second of the girl telling everyone you’re harassing means you’ll get your head bashed in.
It’s a case of our innate desire to root for the underdog, and our primal instincts are that someone physically weaker is the underdog even though in our modern society there are plenty of different ways to get power. In no social environment with a bunch of people do women have less power, in fact it’s the opposite by everyone immediately siding with them if they choose to confront someone.
A man is practically helpless against a woman because what can he do when she sexually harasses him even if she’s weaker? If she yells and tells everyone around you you’re a creep to her, you’ll have your face punched in by other guys. It’s not like you can use your physical strength in any way to get ahead in that situation, in fact it works as a downside in social environments.
A woman can also always use their full strength to assault a man, and a man can’t back. It goes back to women not being taken seriously in their strength, like how women on women fights are called "catfights" because it’s seen as cute and unthreatening as two cats fighting another. That’s not really always the case though, a woman can injure a man far more than a man can back, even if he is already holding back, because a man is "supposed to take it like a man".
If that’s not sexism against men I don’t know what is. Due to our nature of rooting for the underdog we always see women as inherently more vulnerable without realizing that this cavemen level of thinking doesn’t really hold true in the modern world and that women actually hold more power in those situations by being able to rally the support of anyone around her against a man if she so chooses to.
1
-
1
-
1