Comments by "Icetea 2000" (@Icetea-2000) on "This made everyone mad" video.

@MagcargoMan Where do you take from that he was mad? The only mad people I see here are those losing their minds over him just doing this
20
Women act like they don’t want to look at muscular men, and there’s no problem with that. So why should this be a problem?
18
@StreakyBaconMan Why not? You can create whatever the hell you want. If someone wants to make their own version of the mona lisa why not? Doesn’t mean it’ll gain any traction
16
@deadbunny8424 Why? What’s the problem? If people like the edit more?
9
@MagcargoMan What, so anyone who makes a parody or variation of an existing work is "mad at it" for not being what they wanted? Uh no?
7
@trax72 Yes it does? It’s tighter, which is exactly how the Vault suits are supposed to be
4
@zarrowthehorse Bruh this is the most basic shit of all time. Big butt edit, wow, who cares. Things like this are done by the millions each day and nobody cares, why now? Oh right, because it just so happens to be a new show. Well sorry to tell you this, but that’s the Rule 34 of the internet. You can’t stop it anymore than you can stop the weather
3
@deadbunny8424 And so what? It’s an edit, a meme. People in the public sphere are constantly edited. Should trump or biden be allowed to forbid people from editing their faces in weird ways? I don’t get why people act like this is something new
2
@StreakyBaconMan No, you could do that. Lmao it’s insane how some people apparently have no concept of fair use laws. What do you think fanarts in general are, not just R34? That falls within what you can freely create. I don’t think the person that did this edit was "expecting everybody to be impressed", they just made something they like more and shared it if someone feels the same. What’s the moral problem? You seriously just have a problem that someone added a bigger butt on someone 💀 like wtf man, that is not something to have a discussion over, it’s neither illegal nor rude, it’s just something you either want or don’t want to see, in which case you should just move along. I don’t think you realize just how many things you probably view innocuous suddenly become "disrespectful" too following that logic
2
@Subpar1O1 What? The mods or their behavior? Anyway nothing is "incel shit" about wanting to see a hot woman ffs
1
@StreakyBaconMan Lol what? People don’t need to get permission to make edits like this, that would mean the exact same applies to memes as well Who would I be rude to if I made my own version of the mona lisa??? To DaVinci, who is dead for over 500 years? Obviously no one is going to believe that I made the Mona Lisa, it’s obviously just an edit. Lmao you’re not rude or a jerk for doing that, there are plenty of variations of famous artworks and no one believes any of those parodies is the original
1
@gaemer3967 "overwatch hentai" let me tell you about something called rule 34
1
@kaderen8461 ??? Rule 34 mate I swear to god people in the comment section seriously found out about the internet yesterday
1
@StreakyBaconMan Yeah and I said it’s not rude or disrespectful lmao, there’s a thing called "fair use" under copyright for a reason. And yes, it is a crime if you just take someone else’s work to pass off as your own to make money from. However that isn’t the case, no one is claiming anything of someone else as their own, so there’s literally nothing wrong neither legally nor morally. When you make it obvious that it’s not your original work (like anyone making a satirical comic that involves some kind of famous artwork) then why would there be any issue with that. Are you seriously going to get mad at someone that draws a beard on the mona lisa??? Why?? What’s the issue here? No one believes that this guy made the Mona Lisa obviously. You make no sense and aren’t logically sound
1
@mariobadia4553 I didn’t say they’re made out of latex but they’re clearly fairly tight
1
@dg7347 So? She doesn’t need to. You can edit any picture that is public use however you want, you can do whatever the hell you want with a picture you find in google images for example.
1
@dg7347 ITS A HORNY EDIT 😭 What are you even having that much of a discussion about here??? There is nothing even worth mentioning about this, it’s the most normal thing that has been done a million times before this and will be done a million times after this and doesn’t concern anyone who doesn’t want it one bit. Mr. Priest, have you ever heard of porn? They’re not banging against the window of the production studio holding up a sign with this picture 💀
1
@StreakyBaconMan So you allegedly don’t have a problem with changing a character (that is always made by someone) but you do have a problem with changing what someone has made 🤪 Hello??? There are grey areas but fan art per se is not a copyright violation Anyways I still don’t get you, why would you possibly have a problem with people changing something however they like if they keep it to themselves? The only reason you saw that is because people retweeted it and then Asmon saw it and now here we are. But it’s not like that’s what the person intended, they just gave her a bigger butt because they wanted to. Free expression, deal with it.
1
@paulcashew5795 So? Do you think that now is the first time that is happening? What I have a problem with is people getting all on their moral soapboxes when this is literally the most common thing on the internet. You’re like parents in the 90s talking about violent videogames essentially
1
@paulcashew5795 Yeah but theft is also objectively wrong and therefore illegal. Just editing a big butt on someone can not objectively be called immoral, that’s just your opinion. Also that wasn’t a petty insult, that was a legitimate comparison point with parents in the 90s because it’s the same train of logic
1
@paulcashew5795 What do you mean "okay"? Do you want me to say it should be forbidden? Because if you’re not saying that then all I can tell you this is something anyone is free to do, it’s one of the aspects of freedom of expression, deal with it. I didn’t say something is okay by how often it is done, but people never even complain about similar stuff like this, you just do now because it’s popular. Meanwhile anyone who is even tangentially related to an act of theft thinks badly of it. Yes it does, you’re arguing on the basis of some supposed morality how you shouldn’t do this. Just like how religious parents acted how children will become satan worshippers from violent games. You might think to yourself how different you are but it doesn’t change the fact of trying to claim moral superiority over things that are completely legal and trying to tell people what they should do to be "morally correct"
1
@paulcashew5795 Yes you are, if you’re saying something is not morally acceptable you are literally saying people shouldn’t do it, why are you blatantly trying to lie like this? And depicting someone a certain way doesn’t have to concern them when they’re not forced to see it. Trump also can’t have a problem with you drawing a mustache on a picture of him. It’s absolutely ridiculous that you try to tell people they can’t edit pictures however they want just because it involves random people, of course it does, and it’s not a problem. And no matter how much you’re trying to say you’re not talking about telling people what to do, when you say it isn’t morally acceptable that is literally what you’re saying. Think about the implications of what you’re saying more
1
@paulcashew5795 YES IT DOES! Whether you like to or not, what do you think your definition of "morally correct" behavior entails? The definition of moral behavior is that it is behavior you believe one should abide by. That is literally what it is. If you say something is morally correct behavior but you don’t believe people should do it then you don’t understand what moral behavior to a person is. There is nothing wrong with it, deal with it. You can edit any picture you publicly find online however you want, that’s freedom of expression. There’s nothing wrong with it and there shouldn’t be anything wrong with it. And what now? What follows from it? So you don’t want to make it illegal, but you still say it’s wrong. You want to send a hate mob after them? If not, and you know nothing will happen, then this is inconsequential, meaning you arguing over it is pointless if you aren’t even willing to say it’s something they should do
1
@paulcashew5795 The first part of your comment? Mate, learn how to read comments, they reply to you chronologically. Now read again
1
@paulcashew5795 ??? Yeah, I asked you because you were talking about "morally correct" behavior! And as I painstakingly tried explaining to your thick head, saying something is morally correct means you think people should be doing it! That’s the whole point of denoting something as morally correct!
1
@paulcashew5795 ???? Ok now you’re just actively gaslighting me. You literally said "no one here is talking about what you should do" and now you’re telling me "yes you should be doing morally acceptable things", then why did you lie before? Are you even aware of your own hypocrisy here? It’s so grating trying to argue with someone like you
1
@paulcashew5795 What you’re saying is making no sense. How tf am I excluded when you say "this is what people should do". It’s very simple, yet you overcomplicate it for no reason. If you say something is morally correct behavior, then you say it’s something other people should do in your opinion. I'm not avoiding anything, it has nothing to do with my point because I wasn’t talking about it. It’s morally acceptable because you’re not affecting the person. If you’re going down that road you should also believe that piercing voodoo dolls or throwing darts at posters of people is morally wrong. No, it’s simply morally acceptable because it’s not that person. A person isn’t a picture someone finds on the internet. That doesn’t mean it’s socially acceptable or that others have to like it.
1
@paulcashew5795 Yeah and anything you can do can affect another person, that’s what life is. What matters is what can actually tangibly affect another person. The consent aspect is not necessary because you’re not doing anything to them. You have still not answered my question of how you feel about literally any edit of a popular person. Should Biden and Trump have to give consent to any edit there is of them online otherwise it’s immoral? According to you they have to Arguably you are depicting someone in a different way if they have a punch of darts stuck to their face. This argument of yours just doesn’t hold much weight because there are so many counterexamples to it where it just falls apart.
1
@paulcashew5795 No, but things you do affect others anyway. What??? 😂This is literally an edit though, how is it different? This is an edit of a bigger butt, something completely innocuous, yet you’re acting like it’s reprehensible. "Edits don’t depict others in ways they haven’t already presented themselves"????????????? If I edit a dildo on Biden's head I’m pretty sure he didn’t already present himself this way lol. Did you perhaps confuse "edit" with "uploading clips online"? You have just completely forgotten what "editing" even means as a word lmfao
1
@paulcashew5795 No, but things you do affect others anyway. What??? 😂This is literally an edit though, how is it different? This is an edit of a bigger butt, something completely innocuous, yet you’re acting like it’s reprehensible. "Edits don’t depict others in ways they haven’t already presented themselves"????????????? If I edit a MAGA hat on Biden's head I’m pretty sure he didn’t already present himself this way lol. Did you perhaps confuse "edit" with "uploading clips online"? You have just completely forgotten what "editing" even means as a word lmfao
1
@paulcashew5795 You're again contradicting yourself. You stated that "it’s immoral to depct others in ways they haven’t presented themselves or agreed to" and now you’re backpedaling on it. This is definitely something Biden would not have agreed to and wouldn’t want, he literally hasn’t given consent. Why isn’t this immoral? That’s right, because none of this is immoral and your position was nonsense in the first place. Bro just recognize that you’re a hypocrite and that your position is unarguable. You’re not making any sense at any juncture and are so easily called out for your BS
1
@paulcashew5795 Lmao you’re too deep down your contrived contradictions ending in hypocrisy that you just bail, there, rephrased that for you. No matter in what directions you argue you will in the end have to admit that there can not be anything wrong with this, except that you personally just don’t want it, which no one ever argued about anyway. And that’s why you refuse to argue further
1
@paulcashew5795 BUT ITS STILL NOT HOW THEY PRESENTED THEMSELVES, NOT EVEN CLOSE TO SIMILAR! Nowhere did you state it has to be something "extreme", furthermore that is so incredibly subjective I don’t even know where to begin with this logic, it’s asinine. Lmao, you’re such a massive hypocrite and you don’t even realize it. You’re changing your standpoint like a leaf in the wind.
1
@theworld6710 >It's almost like Nice condescending reddit speak, very popular with everyone I assure you. And why are women always acting like sexualizations aren’t made towards men without "their approval"? What is that even supposed to mean? Is there a common council of the united women of the world or something where you have to ask every woman whether she’s okay with a portrayal of a fictional character in a sexualized way??? You don’t need any "approval" to just make something that doesn’t force anything on one individual in particular. Both men and women were sexualized simultaneously, yet modern feminists believe it somehow was only women for the enjoyment of men?? Huh? And women just weren’t interested in men and seeing them sexualized with big muscles? That’s just historical revisionism.
1
@theworld6710 That is such a non-argument. Have you actually thought about the words you say?? Yes, an ACTOR, someone who’s PLAYING A CHARACTER. No one is forced to be an actor, if you don’t want to look like the character you don’t take the role! If you want to play a vault dweller the skintight suits are just part of that, no one is forcing you to take on that role in the first place if you don’t like it. But that’s not even the case here, it’s not that Ella Purnell changed this or wouldn’t have done it but the show producers chanhed it. Where are they? Oh I don’t know, right in front of me? I'm apparently talking to one? I wonder, how do you rationalize to yourself that the show is way hornier than the games ever were with all that blunt talking about procreation and talking about sperm counts and reproductive organs? But lore accurate skintight suits??? OH GOD NO HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO THE POOR SLAVE ACTORS!!!
1
@theworld6710 Here's hoping for one reply that isn’t condescending. Who is talking about treating anyone like a toy??? It’s not being a toy to wear skintight suits. Damn, guess when I went scubadiving and had to wear skintight suits I really was just being objectified as a toy lmao. Also I wasn’t talking about changing the contract in post obviously. Again, you haven’t addressed the fact that the show is obviously way more sexualized than the games ever were. Yet that apparently is no problem to ask of actors, but how dare they wear tight clothing like they do in the lore? It even makes sense, the vaults are supposed to ensure the survival of humanity so they have to encourage reproduction which the show clearly knows with the dialogue anyway.
1
@theworld6710 Oh my god stop this condescending talk, it’s just grating. You’re not looking smarter for it, it just ironically makes you look more childish. Just drop the sass and snarky remarks. Oh so now again it’s about women, when my first comment was about how this is not only limited to women but men too. Why focusing only on women here? Oh something that is forced upon them? You mean like the dialogue? Yeah, they agree to these things, just like they agree to what they wear on set. It’s literally the exact same thing, if you advertise the role including wearing this vault suit, you’re not forcing anything on anyone, they agreed to that role under those terms, just like the dialogue. And the dialogue being as sexually charged as it is, is an invention by the show too, so why is that not also problematic to you? Because the actors agreed to that? Well, who is saying they couldn’t agree to wearing the suits beforehand or not? Also the vault suits aren’t even that sexually provocative, it’s not even as skintight as a diving suit. I don’t know why this is the hill you want to die on
1
@Espartano692 You seem like the type of guy who thinks just drawing porn of people is unacceptable. Am I right here?
1
@wyp8098 But this is about an actress. She would never be there without her consent to be in this medium.
1