Comments by "Javier Pacheco" (@javierpacheco8234) on "China’s Sporting Super-Complex Explained" video.

  1. China is making ugly cities not caring about their surroundings.
    6
  2. A lot of idiots in the comment section. When you build too fast and big , they are not thinking about how future populations will immigrate in these seperate communities. They should consider having streets, roads for cars and trucks and buses, somewhere for trains to transport, as well as parks. How are these good cities when those ideas are not into consideration becuase that's what makes a good town or city. A city or town is a place to bring people together not separate it.. They way it is plotted feels divided, not feeling belonged, they should let with time and other people build their cities naturally, not artificially and unlasting. That's how you can create a great town or city. To make Manhattan it took around 200 years to make it what is now, and people nowadays want and entire city in just 10 to 20 years, you're not gonna have that. Good work takes time.
    3
  3. That stadium is just bland. A better design could be made.
    3
  4.  @sophisticatedthumb5364  no you are blind, there cities look like Sim city all artificial and ugly. It's a disgrace to great city planning and creating great cities. China is creating a fake dystopian world with no sense of meaning. Very ugly. And what you are comparing a ugly city of China to whashington, No! You're stupid there is better architecture in whashington than those repetitive concrete tall buildings that are ugly.
    2
  5.  @Psalm118.26  you are following a movement that's full of idiots that think what they are doing is ok and that the future is this. Anything that's modern is boring, no meaning, no color, all glass, all out of place. Very ugly and it's that this architecture is popular becuase it's all monolithic and repetitive and dystopian. There is better design and better architecture before than whatever this bullshit of architecture they are creating now.
    2
  6.  @sophisticatedthumb5364  I know, you don't becuase I'm studying architecture and city planning unless you are some gullible person that doesn't let other ideas be taught too that came from many ideas of the past and americas original city planning was good. You don't know history so that's why you don't know what I'm talking about.
    2
  7.  @Psalm118.26  queens is ok, besides there will always be homeless in any city. Trash is something that needs to fixed and crime too. It's gonna take time. Infrastructure here in New York is getting better. They are doing something about it, they are fixing roads and restoring some buildings and doing better on airports. Here It's ok. I just don't like ugly architecture when it's next to beautiful historical towns. You don't know new york, you don't know the neighborhoods very well. You look at another country and compare it to another It's not a shithole, look at it right before calling something a shithole becuase it's not.
    2
  8.  @neeljavia2965  yeah and people actually believe this is progress. This is not progress, how can you call something that's temporary progress. This shows how ignorance is bliss which means both sides are ignorant at something.
    2
  9. China doesn't play sports, they are just bored with their money.
    2
  10.  @r3dpowel796  foolish comment.
    1
  11. To me they are building to fast.
    1
  12. It's an ugly stadium
    1
  13. It's a horrible bland stadium.
    1
  14. No it's not just good in technology but not character. The design is poor in attractiveness. Just one color which is gray. This isn't genius, you just don't know the quality of a design both good in technology and aesthtic.
    1
  15. China uses slave labor which people work day and night. They way they are building is fast which in return is not good quality and not durable.
    1
  16. China has horrible architecture.
    1
  17. China is corrupt and their cities are ugly.
    1