Comments by "James Campion" (@Jimbo2193) on "Donald Trump and the risk of a NATO-Russia war" video.

and why pray tell would Russia invade Finland other than the USA setting up a nuclear weapons on their border?
7
@ He didn't mention why Russia would invade Finland did he? However, Russia would have every right to take out the missile base in Finland, just as US would if Russia planted nukes in Cuba. It's called provocation and existential threat. By the way ever noticed how the US is prepared to place their missiles in everyone elses back yard and keep the conflicts from harms reach. genius.
6
well said. The US was drunk in their own sudden dominance. Could have worked for a peaceful world but instead went on a rampage and everyone else suffers.
5
Anders assumes like the true war mongering Neo con he is, is that Russia is simply out to take over Europe and are in essence simply evil. No action nor statement from Russia even slightly resembles any intention of attacking Europe. Anders just wants our Military budget to skyrocket at the expense of our standard of living. Another thing, Biden had every chance to react over the last 4 years but did nothing but channel money into the corrupt hands of M.I.C and Ukrainian Oligarchs while Ukrainians die by the thousands. Shame on you all.
3
@ you've been listening to Anders a tad too much. Aren't following the war too closely. Not happy about it but Russia has in effect defeated the 2nd best army in Europe with NATO and the US support. Go figure.
3
@1337flite they joined the European theatre after everyone realized the soviets had defeated the Germans and risked taking all of Germany ... and then some.
2
Dead right, they started the whole Ukraine crisis in 2014 with Nulands' colour revolution and coup. Now they are pulling out as the war is lost.
1
@bryandimery6509 you obviously haven't followed Anders for long. for a light laugh go over his older videos...can't make the shit up he comes out with.
1
@bluemarlin8138 Again... what action or statement has Russia made indicates a potential Russian attack on NATO????Russia has more land and resources than it knows what to do with it. Use your common sense.
1
@micked6141 would love to hear your take on what's going on? Intrigued and always open to other opinions.
1
@Eleolius not sure what you mean about starting 2 world wars, certainly not talking about Russia. Now Russia has not threatened nuclear without first being attacked. Actually Russian doctrine did not allow pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons until a year or so ago when it aligned its policy with the USA whose doctrine does allow for pre-emptive strikes. Just because leaders of countries are brow beaten into allowing US nukes on their soil close to Russia doesn't mean the people want it. What purpose does it serve other than being the target of a first strike response. Utter nonsense.
1
@TheLumberjack1987 😉of course only bots can have another opinion.
1
@micked6141 No and neither should you. They are as bad as our bought and sold legacy media.
1
@gzoechi If you knew anything about the western geo political strategy over the last 200 years, you would know that their obsession with Russia is alarming. In the words of Lord Ismay, sec. gen of NATO." the purpose of NATO is to keep Americans in Europe, the Russians out and Germans down". Now for years Russia has been screaming out for talks on mutual security pact including no NATO in Ukraine but was ignored. Since this crisis began we've heard from several US leaders how we are destroying Russia slowly and not lost a single american. Great!. They now see a Russian victory and are getting out, just like Afghanistan leaving a Ukraine in ruins. I personally see USA as Europes greatest threat. They blew up the pipeline and proceded to entice German industry into the US, then sold LNG for 4 times the price paid Russia. With friends like uncle Sam who needs enemies.
1