Comments by "James Campion" (@Jimbo2193) on "Can Russia win in Ukraine with nuclear weapons?" video.

  1. Anders appeals to those who enjoy a very simplistic view of things. Yes he appeals to the ignorant
    4
  2.  @tomk3732  which they have done.. agree.
    1
  3. After the US backed coup the whole issue for the Russians is security. if NATO enters Ukraine and install missiles...Russia has about 5 minutes to react. Whether you believe it or not Russia sees this as an existential threat and they most likely would use nuclear weapons if pressured. But contrary to what Anders says, Russia is winning and was always going to win. Obama warned against any conflict in Ukraine as the Russians ability to escalate was greater than NATO's. He was right.
    1
  4.  @paulhaynes8045  pure entertainment for me, but continue to indulge yourself by all means.
    1
  5.  @paulhaynes8045  the reason I keep coming here as I'm intrigued by the lengths Anders and other clowns from Danish defence academy, will go to try to convince the masses that Russia is a barbaric army on the verge of collapse, fighting with shovel and whose economy is on the brink of collapse with a leader who will be toppled at any minute. Despite Russia taking swathes of land and taking strategic towns. He is still pushing the conspiracy that Russia blew up their won pipeline even though even the US are saying it was UKrainian operatives, we all know it was the west. The guy is a paid muppet who hand picks facts(very few), hypothesises, theorizes and conjects to make a point that is totally baseless. He and his war mongering MIC industry need to convince the masses that this war can be won and we will fight to the last UKrainian. Anders even had an episode about how dangerous the Gaza war is( not because of the genocide going on) but that its taking attention and resources away from the Ukraine effort. Can't make this up. I'm not an expert but I get my information from independant scholars, academics, ex US millitary and anyone else with a history of knowledge whose carreer and income does not hinge on toeing the official narrative. Best examples is Prof.John Mearshiemer or prof. Jeffrey Sachs, who explain with facts the provocations of the west and this war which has destroyed a country has everything to do with NATO expansion. If you don't believe them Stoltenberg said it himself. But this is all irrelevant to Anders as he has a Russian axe to grind. So this is a summary of my take on the UKrainian disaster. Ever ask yourself about the reason behind US/NATO endless wars the last 30 years???. War is a racket.
    1
  6. Nice spin Anders. The "propaganda" you say was a direct threat which worked. Cameron removed his tweet immediately and Britain denied they would give Ukraine permission to use their missiles on Russian soil. Macron also pulled his horns in with France officially saying troops were not under consideration. To say it's a sign of weakness is utterly laughable. Anders still thinks it's a stalemate with Ukraine defences falling apart this very moment. Fact is all his and NATO's & Europes cheering/ranting from well behind the lines while Ukrainians are being slaughtered, we haven't the stomach or the political will to send our sons and daughters to fight a geopolitical wet dream by western globalists. Europe is becoming increasingly irrelevant, our leaders are doing the bidding of USA and has literally sold out on the European population for allowing the US to start this whole debacle.
    1