Youtube comments of James Campion (@Jimbo2193).

  1. 72
  2. 38
  3. 36
  4. 32
  5. 22
  6. 21
  7. 20
  8. 16
  9. 16
  10. 15
  11. 15
  12. 13
  13. 11
  14. 11
  15. 11
  16. 10
  17. 9
  18. 8
  19. 8
  20. 7
  21. 7
  22. 7
  23. 7
  24. 6
  25. how simplistic can one get. A Russian victory is important for Iran & China as they know they are next if USA destroy Russia. (which has been the plan behind the Ukraine war) "Axis of evil whose goal is to undermine the international rules based order." Oh is that the rules based order where NATO countries get to invade and destroy countries based on lies with no consequences to the perpetrators. The same world order that refuse to condemn the bombing of the Iranian consulate in Syria but condemn the response to this attack??? One set of rules for them, another set for us. Maybe Anders... just maybe they aren't just evil and hate the west but because of the constant undermining of stability backing though backing of terrorist groups, overthrowing governments, proxy wars, sanctions, reneging on agreements that these countries are just fed up with the incessant meddling in countries who don't follow USA's orders. USA started the Ukraine mess with its backed coup. But Anders will not mention that Russian bent over backwards to avoid this war. Stoltenberg said himself the west refused to discuss a non-invasion agreement with Russia months before the war then gloated they got 2 new NATO states by refuse discussions with Russia. Anders, If Russia had empirical plans to invade other countries why did they reduce their military's budget 10 years in succession up to the Ukraine conflict? Anders is a MIC mouthpiece whose job is to muster support for continued arms and money to Ukraine while men are being slaughtered by the 1000's. Ukraine is a sacrificial lamb, was never realistically considered NATO membership and has been half heartedly supported by the west. Just keep the war going until Russia collapse. Not gonna happen. USA the big winner gets to sell LPG to Europe, everyone is increasing their military budget to buy USA weapons, Germany is deindustrializing at an alarming rate(most of which are moving to USA for cheap energy) and the European leaders are throwing its citizens under the bus for the Elite running US and Europe. Can't make this shit up.
    6
  26. 6
  27. 6
  28. 6
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  you listen too much to guys like Anders and our media because life's so much simpler to understand when packed nicely into a sweet narrative. Russia did not start the war in Ukraine, Ukraine had a Russian friendly government (VOTED IN... you know democratically) until the USA organized coup. Please don't deny that. Eastern Ukraine, Donbass and Crimea would not recognize the USA puppet Poreschenko as their leader and proclaimed their autonomy. Ukraine sent an army down to quell the uprising leading to 14K plus dead in the region. In the meantime Russia annexed Crimea ( not a shot fired) and then held a referendum to join Russia. Remember Crimea was part of Russia up until 1957. They would be insane to give their only warm water port. Luhansk and Donetsk pleaded to Putin for 6 years to let them join Russian which he denied while he was trying to get the Minsk accord implemented (sound like the actions of an imperialist???). Ukraine is used to actually wage a war on the EU and Russia as they were getting too close and the USA see this as a threat. Our media and politicians pushing for escalation need to convince people like yourself that Ukraine has a chance of winning this war where as they are being slaughtered for geopolitical games. Every time our leaders spout out "democratic values" , sovereignty , respect for borders, no one sees the irony after our destruction of Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Serbia, Yemen.. etc. Ever wonder why not a single journalist or major media outlet in the world has never queried the official narrative.... because they are all bought and sold, as is the host of this blog who need to protect their livelihood and careers.
    4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 3
  64. 3
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71. 3
  72. 3
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. The simple answer is YES Anders, that is why after 3 mobilizations they are still dragging people off the streets, demanding EU countries send the refugees home and Zelenski is continuously trying to involve NATO by lying about so called Russian attacks on NATO soil. I find it strange that when Russia was on an offensive they were suffering much more casualties (despite the massive artillery advantage) simply because they were on the offensive... it's logic. Now Ukraine has been on the offensive for 4 months and taken about 1% of the occupied territory and still the Russians are losing soldiers at a much higher rate. Despite them sitting in protected defensive positions in strategically positions to give max advantage fining long and short range weapons.... they are still losing. Despite the mountains of video evidence of the Ukrainian salient in the south where attack after attack are being absolutely decimated..... Still it's a question of time before the Russians collapse. Just spitballing here Anders but maybe .... just maybe the Russians are just sitting back and waiting for the Ukrainians to expose themselves in waves. When the pressure is too much they pull back to the next defensive line. A classic war of attrition with catastrophic consequences to Ukraine whom neither you nor any other western so called war enthusiast give a damn about. If the public were informed of how bad it was they would demand peace talks but that's where you come in spinning the MIC narrative. Sickening
    2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. I was wondering how you were going to put a positive spin on the offensive disaster, you sure exceeded my expectations. Since the offensive began 4 months ago in which the goal was to reach the Azov sea in a month or so they have yet to break through the first major Russian defence, the vegan line. They have breached the line with some infantry ( and 1 armoured vehicle that was destroyed) but any reinforcements are picked off by Russian artillery. Russia have lured Ukrainians into a cauldron when they have been fighting from lowlands for 4 months and taking massive losses. They have little time now before the rain season, if they continue they will be bogged down with no way to get out. Anyone can see this. Anders talks of the Russians not able to withstand this endless offensive by Ukraine!!! The Russians are already pushing back and Ukraine will lose everything they gained in the last 4 months in a matter of weeks, simply because of the terrain and the hole they find themselves in. Russian losses?? When Russia was on the attack, Anders argued that they were suffering more losses than the Ukrainians which is normal during an offensive. Now the Russians are still suffering more casualties despite them sitting in their concrete reinforced bunkers and out gunning the Ukrainians, an air force and endless missiles. Go figure. I don't see Russian citizens being dragged off the street to be sent off to the front. I don't see women being conscripted in Russia for the war effort. Effective from 1st oct in Ukraine. I don't see Russia asking neighboring states to send the men that deserted to avoid conscription back home. 300k Russians have voluntarily signed up since the summer....no Putin doesn't need a round of mobilization. But according to Anders it's the Russians suffering lack of men and moral. Western papers are reporting first hand from Ukrainian soldiers about the massive losses they have taken in the south. The are growing signs of war fatigue in USA and Europe. The support will dry up and USA will soon look for an off ramp and go on to the next big cash cow for the MIC... China and Taiwan. But until then we need mouthpieces like Anders to paint a rosie picture to keep our support for this bloody war, which will leave Ukraine in ruins and EU holding the bag as far as supporting a fallen state. Big winner USA of course. Looking forward to Anders' next video, ukrainians no doubt will be sunning themselves on the beaches of Crimea by then.
    2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. Total nonsense that Russia's plan was to take control of the whole of Ukraine, the amount of the invasion force is proof of this. Their aim was to scare Ukraine into a peace deal that ensured their nuetrality. They soon found out the west would not allow this and began to prepare for a long war. It's now become apparent that most of the aid will go to replenishing US stocks not to the war effort. To say a war of attrition is in Ukraine's favour is dillusional. Russia has the resources, industry and the man power to continue until a complete compitulation. Their production of "shovels" will continue to grow as required. Obama said not to start a war with Russia in Ukraine for the simple fact that Russia has the ability to esculate than NATO. The fact the Russia believes it is fighting for it's existential survival and not a geopolitical wetdream of NATO/USA to bring down Russia should be enough to convince any sane person that Russia will and has to win this war. USA/NATO haven't the production capacity to match Russia indicated by the wests own predictions on how they will ramp up production. Anders at least has dropped the BS about this war being a stalemate, a big about face. Anders also predicts a hugs Russian offensiv this summer. Rubbish,this requires a huge concentration of men and this war has clearly shown it is not a good idea with the survailance and drone warefare. Why would they when they are steadily taking ground after saturating Ukrainian positions with FABS. If they meet too much resistance they pull back and send another round in. It is painfully clear that Ukraine is slowly collaspsing and won't have an army for Anders' predicted offensiv in the future years. Ukraine has been thrown under a bus by the west.
    2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. Anders honestly you really believe the vomit you've thrown up in this video. "geeky millitary THEORY"??? "POSSIBLE meaning of the attack"! Just spitballing here mate but... Who would benefit from sabotage? : USA. 1. European gas supplies increase from 21% to around 70%. 2. Gas costs $60m per ship, sold in Europe for $270M. Quite a windfall. 3. Collapse of the European economy. Finances and Industries flowing out of Europe to USA. 4. Europe remains totally dependant upon USA for energy, finance and security. 5. creating fear by blaming Russia and voila! increase in military budgets. Not much for theories but have some facts. 1. Both Biden and Nuland both stated the NS2 would never be operational, one way or another. 2. USA/Nato exercises in the Baltic sea in July around Bornholm specializing among other things the use of underwater drones. 3. Several USA ships left had been in the area for days and left the day of the explosions. 4. Unrest in Europe and the increasing pressure for Germany to open NS2. Sabotage put an end to that. 5. USA strengthens the more Europe is decimated. Why it isn't Russia. 1. They have destroyed the greatest leverage they had on Europe to lift sanctions. 2. They could have just turned off the flow instead of destroying the $11B dollars they invested. 3. With all the USA ships in the area leading up to the event and the extensive Danish surveillance around Bornholm, I really don't think the Russians would have attempted anything at the time. Anders, you are a warmongering mouthpiece for the MIC/NATO/western globalist. You've sold our your county and Europe by pushing their agenda in which Danes and Europeans alike are paying a huge price. I'll leave in the famous words of Henry Kissinger. "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
    2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  MacGregor has been on the money with about everything. Couple of things. The Kharkov offensive was a success however Russia had already withdrawn the forces and a few residual defence units remained. You don't roll over a hundred KM in a few days against any form of resistance. However it was still at a cost to the Ukrainians. This debunks the narrative that Anders and co. run with that Russia don't value the lives of their soldiers. They simply didn't have the manpower to defend it. If you'd listen to McGregor Russia went in with 90K, that is not an invasion force. Kherson was again a withdrawal which by Ukrainians own admission were decimated during their offensive. Russia could not sustain the forces on that side of the river. Again they considered the lives of their soldiers above the political blowback by withdrawing. Now to the present where Russia aren't pulling back but are prepared, the Ukrainian offensive is just going "swimmingly" (sarc) don't you think. In the first couple of weeks they lost 20% of the supplied NATO Equipment, however western analysists claim they only lost 10% more in the last 3-4 weeks! That's 30% and they have very little to show for it. They haven't even made it to the first Russian defence lines. Russia are on the offensive in Karkiv and making progress. MacGregor predicted this and said all along Russia was betting on negotiations by threatening full blown invasion. If they intended to invade and occupy they would have went in with more than 20% of their forces. Now they realize there is no point in negotiations so have geared up for a massive counter offensive. Ukraine has just envoked national conscription because they are running out of men. The west can't supply the artillery or weapons. Very sad but this Ukrainian offensive was their last hurrah. They are finished and the West's plan to destroy Russia economically, millitarily and polically has absolutely fallen flat. And Ukraine used as a battering ram has payed the ultimate price.
    1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. If Ukraine can ... and if they...then if... then this is possible. A lot of ifs. When Russian are on the offensive it doesn't make sense, when Ukraine make ground its fantastic. With respect to the Kherson bridge is not working at reduced capacity as the railway line on which Russia move their logistics is functioning normal. Yes Anders Ukraine has the strongest army in Ukraine but could you at least point out that Putin was restricted to use about 20% of its potential forces. Russia are outnumbered 5:1 on the battle field. You don't mention the 300k on the way. The pointless attacks on Ukrainian cities as you put it took out 80% of their air defences (according to Col. Doug Macgregor) which is why the day after Zelensky is appealing to the west for air defence systems. They took out the SBU headquarters, German consulate, I believe the EU office took a hit, electricity, water and railway transporting western arms. I don't see that as pointless. 200+ missiles at cities and 19 dead(some secret police) I don't think you could call that indiscriminate attacks. Donekst city has lost more in a day from Ukraine shelling. Your bias in you appraisal and judgement resonates throughout your videos something one would expect to come from either Russian or Ukrainian media. Your job is to muster support among general public to keep this war going knowing full well Ukraine can not win this. Looking forward to your videos come November when the 300k Russians are on a major offensive costing untold innocent Ukrainians lives because you and the mafia you represent are cheering from a safe distance behind the lines.
    1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  "Well, you could say Crimea was part of the Russian empire, but it wasn't Russia, like many countries that regained independence." Crimea was part of Russia and was handed over to Ukraine in 1957 by Khruschnev a Ukrainian! My point being that the people are predominantly Russian and voted unamiously to rejoin Russian Fed. *********************************** "(unless you agree president Putin is another Peter the Great to retake parts of the late empire (what about Alaska ?)) Would you equally say Russia is part of Mongolia, because it was part of the empire created by Ginghis Han ?" that is just nonsense, thought this was a serious exchange. *********************************** Do you know any source to confirm the hmmm... idea of "no move of NATO eastwards"? here is one which is a tad pro western. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/russias-belief-in-nato-betrayal-and-why-it-matters-today "A new book, Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of the Cold War Stalemate, by the prize-winning historian Mary Elise Sarotte, charts all the private discussions within the western alliance and with Russia over enlargement and reveals Russia as powerless to slow the ratchet effect of the opening of Nato’s door. The author concludes the charge of betrayal is technically untrue, but has a psychological truth." "At one level it narrowly focuses both on verbal commitments made by the US secretary of state James Baker under President George HW Bush and the terms of a treaty signed on 12 September 1990 setting out how Nato troops could operate in the territory of the former East Germany. Putin claims that Baker, in a discussion on 9 February 1990 with the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, made the promise that Nato would not expand to the east if Russia accepted Germany’s unification. The following day Chancellor Helmut Kohl, ambiguous about Germany remaining in Nato after unification, also told Gorbachev “naturally Nato could not expand its territory to the current territory of the GDR”. The promise was repeated in a speech by the Nato secretary general on 17 May, a promise cited by Putin in his Munich speech. In his memoirs, Gorbachev described these assurances as the moment that cleared the way for compromise on Germany. *********************************** Why would B. Yeltsin then say and sign Russia has nothing against of the access of Poland in 1999? Because he was a drunk and sold out to the west and Russian was in no position to demonstrate, they were a basket case through the 90's. That's why NATO had a free run to rain missiles on Serbia for 90 days. *********************************** Also, if you go off topic , o you know how many Ukrainians "worship" S. Bandera (and why?) ? percentage know but many of those in Politics and the armed forces. They don't try to hide it.
    1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. ​ @TomFranklinX  Taleban governed Afghanistan numbskull not the US created and funded Al QUEDA. Syrian was overrun by yet another the US brainstorm to destroy Syrian, remember the photo ops with known outlawed ISIS leaders and McCain??? Can't make it up. They rebranded those different terrorist factions so many time they ran out of names. US still occupying oil rich areas of Syria and stealing their oil. ISIS is defeated so get the fuck out! Libya had the lowest mortality, highest literacy, best living standards of all of Africa and arguably middle east, NATO stepped in and is now a model state 🤣. He also kept the 1000's of refugees from EU's doorstep. Iraq war is over 20 years ago, yet after repeated requests refuse to leave. That is occupation. Did you know that the US has been involved in over a 1000 military actions around the world since the 1990's? What is Ukraine do to warrant an invasion??? Well the citizens did nothing however. 1. After the US coup of 2014, ½ the county (Russian speaking or russian ethnic) lost representation. 2. The US installed regime then proceeded to ban opposition parties, news outlets, reporters(some killed). 3. Banned russian language (Romanian and Polish), russian culture, church and entities. 4. The areas who refused to accept the US puppet regime were then and have been ever since attacked and shelled daily for 8 years. (14K dead according to OSCE). 5. Ukraine refused to implement the Minsk accord which gave the regions autonomy but remained in Eukraine and ensured Ukraines neutrality. Instead used the 8 years to build up an army to NATO standards for the upcoming war with Russia. 5. Applied for NATO membership which ultimately ends in potential nukes being setup 7 minutes from Moscow!! Think I can understand Russia's paranoia here. It was their red line which Putin spelled out since 2007 but the west refused to listed. 6. 90,000 ukrainian troops amassed on the Donbass start of this year and according to OSCE shelling increased 1000 fold!!! A massacre of ethnic Russians was immenient. Well that's a few but could go on however I doubt your narrow mind is incapable of taking any more in without a mental overload.
    1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276.  @UserErr0r3578  No coup? Yanukovych signed an agreement to hold early elections and pull his security forces back. This was backed by Russia, French, USA and I think Germany. The day after the Azov and other extreme right wing groups stormed the parliament and yes he fled. The west reneged on the deal and recognized the newly installed regime. You know the one Nuland had already picked out with Poreschenko as leader. Now if 100,000 protestors and overthrow an elected president, I'd call that a coup. As for your election the Russian oriented eastern Ukraine would not recognize nor participate with demonstrations and armed resistance in the east. You do recall the 20 odd pro Russians demonstrators in Odessa slaughtered in the trade union building(burnt or shot) by the Azov thugs???? On camera. Russia would never have signed the Budapest pact if Ukraine had intentions of joining NATO and they didn't until after the coup when the new pro western government removed it from their constitution. Russia are a little paranoid about Ukraine and with good reason. They were invaded via Ukraine from Europe a couple of times the last one costing 26million. Think you'd appreciate that. Now fact is Russia are taking back the pro Russian areas, funny how there is no resistance in Crimea or the Donbass. The west started this mess with our exceptional arrogance and Ukraine is paying for it. Now the west is abandoning them and we in Europe will have to deal with this mess, not to mention our economy is in free fall. Russia's army is stronger than ever and far from isolated which was our plan. Time to move on and destroy Georgia now. Watch this space for Anders to put his pro NATO spin on that.
    1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. When you say things aren't going well for the Russians with the relatively few gains I think you need to consider a couple of things Anders. 1. Russia is up against virtually a NATO army, trained and equiped over the last 8 years.(as they new this war was coming :-)) 2. Bakhmut and adveeka the most fortied cities in arguably the history of european warfare. 3. Both of these essential cities to Donekst/Lughansk defence are technically surrounded and being saturated by Russian artillery (6:1 outgunned) 4. The fact that Russians haven't stormed anyware is testimony to what Col. McGregor and Scott Ritter claim that Russia with their artillery superiority are fighter a war of attrition. Bombing the bejesus out of the Ukraines then move slowly forward when safer to do so. It is ludicrous and beyond comprehension to imply the Ukrainians have the luxury of carrying out a war of attrition infering more Russians are dying than Ukrainians. With the slow movement of the front line and artillery superiority of 6:1 there can be only one outcome. The kviv indendent was gloating over 16,000+ Russian soldiers have died since the start of the war, we know most of the Ukrainian army which started with around 450K and 200K reservists have all but perished(over 100K KIA). 3 rounds of mobilization i Ukraine so far and they have resorted to kidnapping of men in cities around the country. Now with the Russia capacity to manufacture more artillery shells than the west can supply Ukraines I'd say time is on the Russians's side, fighting a more and more depleted Ukrainian military who are spending more shells a day that the west can supply in a month. So I think the Russians would be pretty happy with the way things are going. To say Russia has spent all it available resources on a winter offensive is simply wrong. The majority of the mobilized forces haven't entered Ukraine as yet. Not sure where you get your information from. Utter rubbish to claim Putin orders his generals for an all out offensive during winter to sure up political support, it hasn't started yet. The ground never froze enough for the 250K mobilized soldiers to begin and now the rain season will also cause a delay. I do enjoy the rosey picture you paint for the Ukraines, no doubt they'll soon be in Moscow. Looking forward to your next video.
    1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338.  @paulhaynes8045  the reason I keep coming here as I'm intrigued by the lengths Anders and other clowns from Danish defence academy, will go to try to convince the masses that Russia is a barbaric army on the verge of collapse, fighting with shovel and whose economy is on the brink of collapse with a leader who will be toppled at any minute. Despite Russia taking swathes of land and taking strategic towns. He is still pushing the conspiracy that Russia blew up their won pipeline even though even the US are saying it was UKrainian operatives, we all know it was the west. The guy is a paid muppet who hand picks facts(very few), hypothesises, theorizes and conjects to make a point that is totally baseless. He and his war mongering MIC industry need to convince the masses that this war can be won and we will fight to the last UKrainian. Anders even had an episode about how dangerous the Gaza war is( not because of the genocide going on) but that its taking attention and resources away from the Ukraine effort. Can't make this up. I'm not an expert but I get my information from independant scholars, academics, ex US millitary and anyone else with a history of knowledge whose carreer and income does not hinge on toeing the official narrative. Best examples is Prof.John Mearshiemer or prof. Jeffrey Sachs, who explain with facts the provocations of the west and this war which has destroyed a country has everything to do with NATO expansion. If you don't believe them Stoltenberg said it himself. But this is all irrelevant to Anders as he has a Russian axe to grind. So this is a summary of my take on the UKrainian disaster. Ever ask yourself about the reason behind US/NATO endless wars the last 30 years???. War is a racket.
    1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1