Comments by "Phil Davenport" (@phildavenport4150) on "The Times and The Sunday Times" channel.

@aldopedroso6212 Correct. In the US, road rage issues are settled by shooting first, then engaging in debate, if at all. Hollywood has trained the Americans well.
17
@johnvienta7622 So watching him shoot two protesters means nothing? Can't cuff him and arrest him? Where are you from?
15
@jasonmorris9330 Oooh, an expert in his own lunchtime. Any time now we'll doubtless read your evidence in a scholarly journal.
4
He's panicking to the point where he was unable to locate, without prompting, the document to which he was referred.
3
Um, if we could get non-motorist jurors to sit on a jury when a motorist is being tried for manslaughter, or higher, we would get a greater conviction rate. Same could be said for high profile cases like this one. First, try to convince the Bar Standards Board that action is both warranted and in the public interest. Then observe the fall of shot.
2
Money talks, poverty listens.
2
@tricatfilms6136 Don't forget the free sex, even if you really didn't want it.
2
@petemc5070 The slippery silks who represent them would show just how they can justify the thousands of pounds a day that such representation would cost.
2
@pippipster6767 Sorry you don't follow the observation.
1
I cannot recall anything that reflects badly on myself or my employer (the Post Office). And please don't refer me to any correspondence to or from me that can in any way be construed as being critical of anything that I or my employer said or did. I won't answer with anything intelligible or sensible, so just be told, OK??
1