Comments by "Phil Davenport" (@phildavenport4150) on "Valuetainment" channel.

  1. Great logic. Not.
    21
  2. You're easily amused. Try discovering what really happened instead of hanging off every word that the charlatan Sibrel utters.
    9
  3. To be expected. Bart spouts bullshit not worth listening to, and Patrick is attending to something far more important. Like maybe arranging a haircut, or ordering a box of canned peas from Costco.
    9
  4.  @chrisfrancis9555  Only everything that comes out of his mouth. He's great at sounding persuasive, claiming things with no evidence behind his utterances. Works well on folk who don't know how, or don't want, to check his claims.
    4
  5. Wow I'm convinced! Great confirmatory research on your part.
    4
  6.  @Jonny-eu7le  And you would have all these "facts", of course. All meticulously investigated by you and not simply regurgitated from YT crap being peddled by landing deniers. OK, then, show us what you have personally verified.
    4
  7. Evidence? Sibrel specializes in sounding convincing to the weak and stupid, not in presenting evidence for any of his claims.
    3
  8.  @bonniecandace  Gee, you must live your life indoors with 50 locks on the door and nuclear self-defence weapons within easy reach.
    3
  9.  @reelinfo2089  Wow, you really know how to spot the real evidence - just listen to Sibrel. He'll sell you a great story.
    3
  10.  @nastasedr  Yes, Sibrel is a charlatan.
    3
  11. Suspicions based on the suspicions and complete lack of evidence by another denier? Is that what constitutes "evidence" for you? Why am I not surprised?
    3
  12.  @fallofwesterncivilization4013  And with an hour of sensible research, even you can know that we did indeed set foot on the Moon - on 6 separate occasions. Without the gubbmint telling you anything. While you're at it, you might even discover that the heavy lifting in the computing department was done by NASA's mainframes. Or is that also too much for you?
    3
  13.  @theonewiththeeyeoftruth884  Sibrel's appeal is emotional, not evidential. Sounding convinced and informed, with a large serve of "don't believe the government" captures a lot of the weak and stupid.
    3
  14. Conned you well, then?
    2
  15. Never went back? So the 5 subsequent manned missions were all faked as well? And you know this...how?
    2
  16. And your incisive research skills led you to this? What did you use for evidence?
    2
  17.  @paulregener7016  Hard to increase one's understanding of anything when all you see are conspiracies everywhere.
    2
  18.  @theonewiththeeyeoftruth884  Correct, and the 3 weeks of quarantine would have been consumed mainly by debriefing. Just how excited do these conspiracy dickheads want the astronauts to be after all that? Pathetic children.
    2
  19.  @Jan_Strzelecki  And there are plenty of weak and stupid people who willingly buy into all that conspiracy crap.
    2
  20.  @myotheraccount5947  If only the "fraud" had an ounce of evidence to support it. Nothing stacks up as yet. Do you have any that isn't just restatement of claims by other conspiritards?
    2
  21.  @franklopeziilmtmti603  So if someone in a movie says it never happened, that's enough for you? Ever heard of research - and that does not include the YouTube crap put out by deniers, none of whom have offered any evidence that can survive scrutiny.
    2
  22.  @michaels4255  Evidence? And don't just tell me to "research".
    2
  23. Cool story. Pity it's all bullshit.
    2
  24.  @blitz_zen  Bart specializes in sounding great - to the weak and stupid, who require nothing more than what he says. Evidence? What's that?
    2
  25.  @ePICS8  Apparently not.
    2
  26. No, he didn't.
    2
  27.  @Jan_Strzelecki  Deniers desperately want to believe anything that looks as if it just might suggest fakery. Misinterpretation is rife.
    2
  28. How about you ask Ford to build you an Edsel for your next new car? Well, why not? Surely they still have all the original body panel pressings, hydraulics, electrics , tires, oil, seat coverings, etc, and can assemble it all, just for you?
    2
  29. Well, he wasn't missing anything worth listening to. BS is full of BS.
    2
  30.  @vintagebrew1057  That's what you get for listening to empty conspiracy theorists like Sibrel. Try looking for evidence yourself instead of relying on conmen.
    2
  31.  @RocketsBlastoise  Congratulations! You are now right up there with Bart Sibrel. Well, you make as much sense as he does.
    2
  32.  @brentonmtb  Not at all. It seems most fitting. Besides, if Sibrel thought that he was going to confront an interviewer who know the topic well - he simply would not appear on the program. He specializes in duping the weak and stupid.
    2
  33. "Irrefutable facts"? Oh, you must be referring to the fabrications and red herrings being peddled by charlatans such as Sibrel. Congratulations, you just won the Internet.
    1
  34.  @myotheraccount5947  Well, maybe you should consider conducting real research instead of parrotting all that denier shite that conmen have sold you.
    1
  35.  @gigantor62  Only the weak and stupid fall for Sibrel's bullshit.
    1
  36. Sure, 400,000 worked on the Apollo program, and not one of them claimed that it was all faked. Try working on that problem first.
    1
  37.  @CliffClover  The moron deniers deride your use of Himawari evidence found on the internet, but simultaneously accept all the baseless crap found on YouTube being peddled by the people driving the denier bus. Confused much?
    1
  38. And you would know.
    1
  39. Gee, you have ALL the answers, don't you?
    1
  40. Professor of....Religion? Home Science? Certainly nothing science related, where research ignores the bleatings of the many deniers parrotting the crap sold to them by charlatans like Sibrel, whose baseless claims convince only the weak and stupid.
    1
  41.  @bonniecandace  Conspiritards do no investigation other than seeking confirmation of their crap beliefs in the vids and comments on YT. Nobody's lives or jobs are in jeopardy - that's yet another conspiracy theory to add to the many in evidence.
    1
  42.  @Jdalio5  And you know it to be a lie how? By listening to the charlatan Sibrel and buying the hysteria that has no evidence behind it? Nobody is going to try to convert you to the real world.
    1
  43.  @Jdalio5  OK, take it to court. Or are you so full of it that it's all you can do to say it? Let us know how you get on. But you won't, will you? All talk and no action.
    1
  44.  @Tyler_W  In the context of issues such as 9/11 and Moon landing denial, and flat Earth, for instance, conspiracy theorists are those folk whose warped, baseless beliefs are a product of their believing in government/scientist/Illuminati conspiracies of such a magnitude as to beggar belief. With zero evidence to support them. Happy?
    1
  45.  @The_Zilli  Do the calculations.
    1
  46. Well, Sibrel sure is. And he wouldn't have appeared on air if the interviewer had been well versed in the science and engineering of all six (yes, 6) landings, and in detecting bullshit claims that any of it was faked.
    1
  47. And you would know, of course.
    1
  48.  @veemuyambo  And you would know, right?
    1
  49. Nothing verifies any of that crap.
    1
  50.  @Kratos_the_OG  So, where's yours? Oh, I get it - YouTube conspiracy based crap from other deniers. Got it.
    1