Comments by "DefaultFlame" (@DefaultFlame) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. 52
  2. 28
  3. 28
  4. 21
  5. 10
  6. 9
  7. 9
  8. 8
  9. 6
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 4
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. There should be different degrees for people who want to continue pushing human knowledge and people who just want to be educated on the current state of the art and be a highly paid plumber. The requirement for a PHD thesis "pushing the limits" of human knowleged for every PHD is insane. People who just want to work a job and people who want to advance humanity should not be stuffed into the same classroom. We need plumber, including plumbers who do higher science, and we also need people who push the boundaries. Engineers and scientists. We need both, and we need to delineate the difference between them clearly. I had excellent grades and would have easily been able to enter any higher education I desired with it, but pushing the bounds of science definitely was not for me, and so higher education was not for me partially because I had no idea what specifically to pursue and partially because it required pushing the bounds. I don't want to push the bounds, that's not me. I work to live, I don't live to work. I could have made an excellent engineer, but the requirement to push science further even if all you wanted was to do you 9-5 meant I actively chose not to pursue higher education. I love learning about physics, especially quantum physics, I love learning about mathematics, electrical engineering, and computer science, but writing a thesis on any of it is utterly intolerable to me. I'd love to be a plumber of high science, but the requirement to publish that comes with it puts me off entirely.
    3
  24. 3
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1