Comments by "DefaultFlame" (@DefaultFlame) on "The Lunduke Journal" channel.

  1. 498
  2. 42
  3. 25
  4. 20
  5. 16
  6. 15
  7. 14
  8. 12
  9. 10
  10. 7
  11. 7
  12. 7
  13. 6
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. I asked, "What is Bryan Lunduke's favorite operating system?" and it answered, "Bryan Lunduke, a well-known technology writer, podcaster, and advocate in the open-source and Linux communities, has often expressed admiration for various operating systems over the years, particularly those that are unique or prioritize user freedom. He's known for his fondness for Linux, with distributions like *Ubuntu**, **Arch Linux**, and others being mentioned in his work. However, he also appreciates older or niche operating systems like **Haiku* (based on BeOS) and **Plan 9**, as well as systems that offer a minimalist or unique user experience. His "favorite" might vary depending on the context—sometimes it's Linux for practicality, sometimes retro or experimental OSes for their charm or innovation. If there's a specific source or time frame you're referencing, let me know, and I can tailor the answer more closely!" With the follow up question, "What is his opinion on Windows 11?" it said, "Bryan Lunduke has not publicly provided an in-depth review or detailed opinion on Windows 11 in recent commentary. Historically, he has been critical of Microsoft's operating systems, emphasizing concerns over user data privacy, heavy system requirements, and the forced integration of services like a Microsoft account. Based on his general stance on technology, he would likely view Windows 11 with a similar critical lens, particularly regarding its more restrictive features and increased emphasis on cloud and service integration."
    2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55.  @probablyyourneighbororsome8412  Well, I got lured in by being told that it's so well documented, long running, and supposedly having a lot of support. All of that is true, but no one mentioned that all the documentation, support, and even video tutorials specifically labled as being for beginners (and this applies to Linux as a whole, not just Debian) aren't for actual beginners but for people who already have a few months of daily driving Linux under their belt. For an actual beginner the "explanations" given in documentation and in tutorial videos, if any, amount to gibberish. You just end up chanting memorized incantation at the terminal, hoping it fixes a problem you don't understand using a solution that's might as well be in Mycenean Greek as far as you are concerned. Not to mention the hell of the initial setup and trying to get Nvidia drivers to work, failing, trying to fix it, somehow managing to break the boot process so the GUI doesn't start automatically, and then having to figure out how to even start the GUI from the terminal interface. Having to enable non-free software is one thing, it kinda makes sense, what with the whole FOSS thing. Having to manually add sudo privileges to the administrator account on a fresh install (by editing a freaking text file via the terminal) makes absolutely no sense to me. What use case would that even be for? After reinstalling to fix the GUI-does-not-boot-automatically problem, failing once again to properly install Nvidia drivers, and later another reinstall to fix another problem I gave up on Debian and switched to the other Distro I had been considering, which was Mint. I like Mint. It's smooth sailing, you can use the terminal if you want but (mostly) you don't have to. My only complaint is the removal/disabling of su in the terminal. Took a reinstall to figure out that I hadn't somehow broken it and that it wasn't actually implemented in Mint. (I know I can probably get su working in Mint. Linux is customizable, yadda, yadda, but that's above my paygrade currently.) I'd gotten used to GNOME (despite the Win 8 flashbacks the start menu gave me), but Cinnamon feels like home. (Yes, I know you can change desktop environments, but remember that this was my first time, first distro, and first environment.) Installing the correct drivers was as simple as pressing a button and it just worked. I don't understand why Linux and the Linux community have to make everything so difficult for actual beginners. (As opposed to beginners who have started getting their feet under them.) I remember learning the basics of using MS-DOS and Win 3.11 as a kid on my own by mesing around with it, with no internet to help, no manuals, and no one to give advice. It took a day to get the basics down. They say that they want people to use Linux. They say that every year will be the year of the Linux desktop. They sure don't act like it. I'm sure there are actual tutorials somewhere out there that are aimed at actual beginners, that genuinely teach absolute beginners how to use Linux, but I haven't been able to find them. All I've found are tutorials labled as being for absolute beginners that don't actually teach you the hows and whys and people that tell you to "put in the effort" and "with just a few months you'll get the hang of it." Of course anyone can learn anything with enough effort, but you could, you know, also put in the effort to make it easier to learn? I wish there was a Bob Ross of Linux.
    1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1