Comments by "DefaultFlame" (@DefaultFlame) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. 50
  2. Practical problems to overcome with throwing out the electoral system and switching to a popular vote: The popular vote is already counted, all that needs to be done is to decide to go with that instead of the damned college. Legal problems to overcome: The constitution. AKA, that piece of paper that everyone acts like it's sacred (rather than just a higher set of laws) and that still gets shat on at every opportunity if it will give the slightest advantage. Slap down a bunch of new seats in the House and the Senate that go to representatives and senators chosen by the parties voted on in the presidential election and allocate the number of seats proportional to the % of the popular vote they got. Make sure that there's enough seats that the parties get some real teeth. Like, comprising either a third or maybe half of the seats in Congress. BAM, third parties are actually relevant on a national level and it's not a winner-takes-all system like the presidency. Now third parties are relevant on a national level since the presidency isn't the only national position of power filled by the election, faithless elector don't exist because electors don't exist, you can't win the presidency with an absurdly small number of the popular vote anymore (23 freaking percent . . .), and people who are American citizen but who don't live in one of the fifty states can now vote for the most powerful office in the country rather than having to freaking move to be allowed to vote. If you can vote as a soldier stationed overseas then you should be able to cast a vote if you live in Puerto Rico or American Samoa. Now, watch as every politician loses their head trying to figure out how to game the new system. The chaos would be glorious. My two cents.
    1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1