Comments by "" (@DannyAGray) on "Peter Santenello" channel.

  1. 285
  2. 8
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 6
  6. 6
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. Hi there! I've been LDS most of my life (I say most because I was excommunicated at one point, but then rebaptized). I live currently in Tooele, I have 2 very large tattoos on each forearm (I plan on more tattoos), I previously had an ear pierced, I swear way more than I should, and I'm currently a primary teacher, ward missionary, and I regularly attend the temple. As a kid, I grew up in a town near Phoenix. I was the only Mormon in the school, and I was regularly beat up because of it and other kids' parents wouldn't let their kids play with me because of my faith. As a result, I learned to regularly attend church with my friends just so their parents would like me. I moved to Utah when I was 12, where I was pushed out of friend groups when they found out I was Mormon (yes, in Utah, in Salt Lake City) and made fun of. It didn't help that the only church members I found who were happy to share their faith were the "nerds" who quickly became my best friends. I'm sorry to say that judgement goes both ways, even in Utah. I got my tattoos AFTER I was rebaptized, and to be honest, I'm utterly shocked that the only judgement I've received is from NON-MEMBERS, trying to tell me I could be punished in my faith for it. Yet neither my bishop nor stake president have said a single word in the 2 years I've had them. Anyway, I just thought I'd shore you yet another side to it all. I'm sorry you were judged. If you ever wanna come to church with me sometime, I guarantee you that we'll fully welcome you.
    3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92.  @stokenasty  What is indoctrination? Why do we teach students in school anything at all, lest it be indoctrination? Young members are taught the fundamentals (hence the organization name being PRIMARY) and then they build up their knowledge. And it's really dumb to claim that it's indoctrination when the reality is that SO MANY teens pull away from the church during their adolescent years; I see this all the time, and it's a generalization to say that parents force them to go to church. The reality is that most of the people like Todd, here, are bitter because they didn't take the time to ask questions in their youth, they didn't confront their parents, and they were duped by bad faith actors like Jeremy Runnells. It's possible that they didn't have good leaders - yes, I'm aware that members were more closed off even 15 years ago - but the church has come a long way to really open up. The sad part is that Todd will always prefer to keep his heart closed off and not bother to doubt his doubts. It's also true that members in the Mormon belt (Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming) live in their own bubble. I've been amazed at how many exmos come from these states and claim they weren't taught certain things. I laugh at this because I WAS taught many of the things they complain about, and it's even more hilarious because I grew up in an inactive home. It sounds to me that Todd went to church his whole youth without ACTUALLY being present in church; he must have missed a lot while sitting there in Sunday School.
    1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. @Yindsey  your comment has a lot to unpack, so I'll try to be accurate and efficient: 1. There is no clear understanding of why BY instituted the ban on blacks. However, several factors should be considered. BY was pressured by missionaries returning from Southern states into believing that this was a regular tenant of Christianity (which, by the way, it was at the time; however southern baptists really leaned into it). BY also placed the ban on 1858 - a decade before Jim Crow - potentially in response to the escalating tension in the country. That said, there is no clear answer, and no one condones his ban. If the church were persuaded by society, the ban would have been lifted sooner than it was; however, it was lifted when the leaders received proper input from the Lord, not the world. 2. I'm aware that the church was, at one time, strict about caffeine. Elder Bruce R. McKonkie, in his book Mormon Doctrine (first edition), stated that drinking Coca-Cola disqualifies a member from a temple recommend. Some things to consider, here, are that Elder McKonkie was NOT authorized by the First Presidency to write this book, and he later recanted many of his own statements and beliefs. However, this was still the catalyst for the larger campaign by members against caffeine, and it still lingers with us today for some members. 3. The church does not teach that polygamy is a requirement to become a god. Yes, this was, at one time, an interpretation of a statement from BY. However, the broader context of that statement clearly demonstrates that members ought to be ready to accept whatever challenge God has for them - not necessarily that it is required. I can find the exact quote for you if it helps. In any case, while some may engage in polygamy in the next life, we really don't know how those relationships will work out. What if those who were engaged in it in this life no longer want it? I doubt they will be forced into it, and there is no church doctrine arguing that they would be. 4. As the understanding of medicine grows, so does our understanding that some forms of pot are actually needed. Therefore, instead of punishing members whose doctors prescribe them this drug, the policy was clarified. 5. The doctrine of sexuality has not changed. We still rightly don't have bishops marrying off gay couples, nor are they married in temples. And if one is living a homosexual lifestyle, it still violates the standard by which members are expected to live. However, just like LITERALLY ALL THE REST OF SOCIETY, the church is constantly working to find a balance on how to navigate our neighbors who do live this way, which we see as a violation of God's will and design. While the doctrine is the same, policies change to help find a balance in accordance with the Lord's commandment to love one another. I can see how one such as yourself might say that these are changes brought on by the pressures of society, however I see them more as the church refining itself, its understanding of the Lord's will, and its own connection with the world around it.
    1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1