Comments by "Classic rock Lover" (@classicrocklover5615) on "Massive UK Moderna partnership" video.

@rigaleb because this world is run by evil
5
@jadebell8790 not surprising. What is the basic definition of "cancer"? It's an abnormal cell that divides and produces more abnormal cells, many times reproducing faster than our normal immune cells can. Well, the MRNA GENE THERAPY shot involves using the spike protein to pierce or breach the wall of a healthy cell and insert a man-made like of DNA programming, with the goal of activating your immune system to attack that abnormal cell. Does this situation qualify for the definition of "cancer"
2
In the USA it's always been classified as GENE THERAPY. The only time it's been considered a "vaccine" was for the CV pandemic. Big pharma tried several times to receive FDA approval for different MRNA shots in the past, but was always denied on the basis it did more harm than good. The emergency authorization gave Big Pharma backdoor entrance to use and distribute to the public.
1
@GeneralChangFromDanang here's the interesting thing: while politicians and the media were calling MRNA shots "vaccinations", the health notices and info my medical doctor received from the FDA still referred to them as GENE THERAPY shots! NOT "vaccinations". I know she spoke the truth because she showed me a couple of the notices. She was very against the vax because of all the politics involved etc . She lost her job at the hospital because she refused to take the vax.
1
@Someone-kg8qf really? What's the reason (besides qualifying Big Pharma to be protected from future lawsuits)?
1
I wish someone would investigate FAUCI'S WIFE - she works at NHS, which is how the money flows from the US Fed Gov to the gain of function research
1
The MRNA GENE THERAPY shots should have never been considered a "vaccine". They only did so to give the manufacturers immunity from lawsuits
1