General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

FMNIPMJ
Nomad Capitalist
comments

Comments by "FMNIPMJ" (@jhpfdijtuiweruot) on "Nomad Capitalist" channel.

Much more than 50% tax in UK. You get taxed for everything including watching your tv. And the new traffic taxes in London and other cities are basically a tax for breathing fresh air. Taxed every time you use a public toilet or park your car. And all the council tax gets sent abroad to countries that I can't talk about or I will get a speech tax ticket
157
What a divisive and offensive thing to say about tens of millions of British people who were fed up with the ridiculous bureaucracy and overreach of power from the continent
22
In (mild) defence of the letter writer, it read to me that he was possibly waking up to the horrorshow that is unfolding all around him, and this was just a desperate, clutching-at-straws, denial defence mechanism to pretend that the world is still functioning as "normal". He sounded scared and confused. Hopefully this means he is waking from his coma
12
@sebas8225 Possibly, but what use were the guns in USA when Trump told everyone from a big screen in a park to holster their weapons and go home peacefully, as the Biden/Harris collapse of Western civilisation show rolled into DC...? Unless "Q" is real and this is all "just a show" while Trump works "behind the scenes" (which I do admit could still happen), then USA has already fallen without a shot fired in anger
10
If you don't find a way to move out of the middle class soon, you will be demoted to the metaverse
9
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 I am most definitely not trolling, my friend. I am sharing factual evidence which you can easily confirm for yourself. You originally said "pandemic". It's not a "pandemic". Officially. Not even close. Your tv is lying to you. Your government is lying to you. Your school lied to you. It's really not that controversial
7
@migyman321 Haha. You think you live on a spinning ball of water that is going up in flames
7
@ Yeah and when you work out that they are all private corporations, you realise that it is probably above 100% when you take average debt, mortgage interest, inheritance tax etc into account.
6
Westminster is deserted and Buckingham Palace is empty. The "society" you are yearning for has collapsed. You just haven't worked it out yet
6
@marketingteam3128 Lol. You are recommending that people move to one of the most dystopian digital zoo experiments in the world during the "crisis". Everyone locked up like sardines in tins for years. Unable to enter a shop without a QR code. No internal travel in the country. Children not allowed out of their apartments
6
"Voting". Lol
5
There are no "countries". One bank. One government. Nowhere to hide. Sorry about that
5
Pandemic? Planet? You sure about that? Lol
4
You just said that on the second largest social media platform in the world...
4
Governments ARE corporations. Time to wake up
3
Lol. Flickering lights in the sky. Good luck with that
3
@alandrian You're replying to the wrong person, pal. I haven't said anything about obesity or food. I'm not in that discussion with you. Of course there is an obesity crisis in USA. Where do you think I said there wasn't? I didn't say anything about poisoning of food? I don't believe in flat earth. This conversation is bonkers. What are you talking about? Lol
3
@ Yeah and most of them are voluntary and unenforceable but everyone just hands them over in fear, anyway.
2
You don't understand what XRP is or what it's there for
2
@Jzarecta 10K in which currency? You do realise it might cost 10K to buy a loaf of bread next year, right...? Society has collapsed already. There is no time left to build skills and businesses to escape what's coming...
2
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 What has coronoray artery disease got to do with the scamdemic or the state programmed lie that you live on a spinning "planet"?
2
@alandrian I'm sorry but you did not read any of my statements if you think I thought it was about covid. Are you sure you have replied to the right person here. I haven't discussed any of the stuff you are talking about
2
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 You apparently don't understand the difference between "dying from covid" and "dying within 28 days of receiving a positive test". And you also appear to be completely oblivious to the fact that the tests officially don't work. And that they still haven't even isolated the alleged "virus". The conversation is VERY dumb, yes. I mean that in the most offensive way in the hope that it will shock you out of your hypnotised stupour. Mind blowing that you have been scared by your tv for two years now and think that you might die if you go outside and breath fresh air. Lol
2
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Why the flaky insults and emotional rhetoric? Do you have to attack my personality and falsely profile me because you are unable to construct a sensible retort to the actual discussion in hand? I think you are tallking nonsense and I think you are hopeless but I don't see the point in telling you this...? My brain is firmly switched on, thanks. I am quite intelligent and very well educated, if you must know. And was very successful in my career for many decades. Your fantasies about me are wildly innaccurate and irrelevant. Ok, so what is the official number of people that died from covid not with...? That is the number that would define whether it was a "pandemic" or not. Stop deflecting and telling me what you think about me and ascertain the facts. Thank you for conceding that the tests are faulty and therefore cannot be used to define that a "pandemic" exists or not. I'll discuss whatever I like wherever I like, thank you. Do you think you have the communist authority to silence and censor me when I try to share facts online...? Lol. If you want me to stop talking, then make me... try physical force if you can't silence me with your words...
2
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Nope, not confusing any feeds. I am responding to your exact comments point by point. Yes, you went off on an emotional rant in your previous comment and called me hopeless. It was a personal attack and diversion away from the objective, factual topic in hand. I wasn't offended or upset in any way by your personal attack. I'm not complaining about it. Just pointing out that you are moving the conversation onto the personal and away from the objective reality. It's irrelevant what you think about me. You said "pandemic" and I challenged you for calling something that isn't a pandemic a pandemic. My comments are perfectly apt and reasonable. Stop deflecting. Is there a pandemic or not? If not, why are you calling it a pandemic?
2
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 "Your own words, "What does CAD have to do with the scamdemic?" Yes, that is a question not a rant. What's your point? "Why are we even talking about Covid?" Because you originally made the false claim that there was a worldwide pandemic and I pulled you up and corrected you for it. I didn't particularly mention covid, it was the "pandemic" that we were discussing. And you brought that up. "It came out of nowhere and for no reason." No, you mentioned it and I replied to it. It was a central part of your original comment. And it is false and misleading disinformation. "You also said that I was "Afraid to go outside a breathe fresh air " Again, where did that come from?" You think there is a "pandemic" that has been floating around the sky for two years that humans contract if they breathe it through the air or come into contact with another human. It is ludicrous and illogical, yes. But it's you who believes in it not me. Bizarrely even when you know it doesn't exist. Lol
2
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Because you are (falsely) claiming there is a pandemic throughout the world. WHere else would this pandemic be if it wasn't floating around the air? That's what your government is telling you is happening. Which of my statements do you think is a claim wihtout foundation. Be specific or your claim that I am making claims is unfounded. I didn;t mention viruses, covid or infection. You created a feed and specifically mentioned a "pandemic". I replied to that sepcific part of your thread, Why can't you seem to get that? You said there is a pandemic. There isn't You conceded that and agreed. End of discussion. Why are you now trying to backtrack? We are done. You ere wrong to claim that there is a pandemic and the matter is settled
2
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Yes, you're done. You conceded that your original claim was false. And it's irrelevant what you think about me. Goodbye then! That's twice now you've done the walk of shame. Please don't come back for a third time
2
@alandrian Isn't the troll the one handing out childish and irrelevant insults to deflect from the adult conversation in hand...?
2
@alandrian Ok but I didn't do that, did I? I came to a chat, made a perfectly valid point, and had an extremely polite and civilised converstaion with someone (even though they repeatedly hurled childish insults at me). They conceded that I was correct and the conversation ended. No trolling there. I wasn't making any chidish talk and didn't use any childish phrases. That was the OP.
2
@alandrian "and actually trolls will make up facts and push ideologies even farther than their own ideologies." Ok that may be true. But I didn't make up any facts and didn't share my ideology, did I? "In the cases for right wing trolls I think its funny that other posters on the same political ideology will read what the troll posts and think that it has to be true because the person is on the same side as me." Is it? Can't say I've noticed. And I'm not a right wing troll. I'm not any kind of troll. I am a man speaking words. "Have not seen enough left wing trolls to know if it is true for them as well." Ok, this is irrelevant rambling now. Maybe hire a therapist if you want to talk through these questions...? "P.S. and yes i have witnessed people believing made up facts on the right." Ok, but not sure why you feel pathologically urged to share these bizarre and random thoughts
2
@ Weird that you are attacking me with ad hominem about things that have nothing to do with me. You have no idea who I am, where I’m from, or what my “politics” are. Just another programmed NPC, automatically typing out irrelevant cliches in defence of a fantasy movement
2
@tigading2177 You don’t have to pay for most of it. It’s all money that people volunteer to private corporations who send out scary letters that have no authority
1
@alexandrocolorado4538 I didn't say "by next year", did I...?
1
@alexandrocolorado4538 " I can get a 3 bedroom apartment with private pool for..." Yes I know. You can do many things today that you won't be able to when they flip the switch to the new digital financial system. 10K in fiat currency today is probably going to be worthless very soon. Unless, of course, you think they are just going to continue printing money out of thin air forever and keep giving it to you for pocket money...
1
@alexandrocolorado4538 You do realise it might cost 10K to buy a loaf of bread next year, right...?" Yes, that clearly says "might + next year" not "will + by next year". Do you need me to explain primary school level English to you...?
1
@alexandrocolorado4538 "you think this is the first time I have lived through inflation?" I didn't say it was "I have lived it my whole life, and sure it get rough, you will survive." Good for you. I didn't say it wouldn't. I didn't say I wouldn't. "God you sound like a little kid who think he will die because he fell and scratch his knee." Which specific words do you think I said (or thought) that suggested in any way that I was scared of anything, now or in the future...? "If you are a businessman you will always make money regardless of inflation." Well around 60% of businesses fail in the first three years so that statement is wildly incorrect "Just talk to your closest Venezuelan." Why?
1
@alexandrocolorado4538 No we won't. The switch from paper fiat to digital is inevitable reality not a silly theory like your solar flare nonsense. The only subjectivity about it is when it will happen not if
1
Pat Risberg Yes. So what? Why do you think I think it isn't? And what relevance does it have to do with anything I said?
1
Pat Risberg I didn't make a comment about the existing price of a loaf of bread in the USA (or Mexico or anywhere specific) though. And I wasn't using bread as a reference point for a local farming harvest crisis. You are wildly misquoting me and missing the point of what I was saying
1
@Jzarecta Great, please share some factual evidence that shows that millions of humans have died from solar flare events. If it's a fact not a theory, please share the facts. And also any facts that you have that this factual event is likely to occur in 2022
1
@Jzarecta Yes, so it is a (fearmongering) theory not a fact then. Thank you for conceding that point
1
@alexandrocolorado4538 Ok pal
1
@alandrian "You said "@Vladimir of Svalbard What has coronary artery disease got to do with the scamdemic or the state programmed lie that you live on a spinning "planet"? " "And then wonder why i said your a flat earther? You think its a lie that we live on a spinning planet which is a flat earthers idiotic statement." > You don't live on a spinning planet. I don't "think" that". It's a scientific fact. I'm not a flat earther. "Also the whole discussion is about obesity" > No, you chose to focus your discussion on the obesity elements and I chose to base mine on the pandemic and planet elements. He mentioned obesity and you replied about that. He mentioned pandemic and planet and I replied about that. Why you think it is your job to censor and silence my reply , I have no idea. "so it your not talking about that than wtf are you talking about" > I am talking about a different part of his original comment than you chose to. Wtf are you struggling with about that? "and if you want to talk about something else talk in a different discussion." > How are you going to make me do that, exactly?
1
@alandrian "WTF are you smoking?" > I don't smoke. "None of what you are saying is accurate or true." > Ok prove me wrong and provide factual evidence for the pandemic and the globe. I can wait. "He did not say obesity and pandemic" > When do you think I said that he did? "Your the only one going off topic" > Nope the topics of my conversation are "pandemic" and "planet" - selected directly from the original comment. "because no one is talking about desiese" > Agreed, I'm not either "that is not what the topic is about." > Agreed - it's about "pandemic" and "planet". Your separate conversation's topic is "obesity". I am not interested in joining your conversation about obesity and switching topics. "Im telling you where your wrong." > You think you are telling me where I am wrong. But you're not and I'm not wrong. "Not silencing or anything else." > If you are not trying to censor and silence me, why did you type out these words?: "if you want to talk about something else talk in a different discussion." "Why am i so adamantly correcting you" > You're really not. I don't know why you are trying to correct me either. Do you think you have some kind of power and authority over me that you can tell me what words I can and cannot speak? Lol "because you keep arguing with me" > I'm not arguing or debating anything with you. You approached me with an incessant chain of crazy accusations and lies. I am replying to them and defending my position against your nonsense. "with no facts nor are you even talking about the topic, not to mention the contradictions." > Incoherent rambling. Is this supposed to be a question? What do you want? This is absolute drivel. Lol
1
@alandrian "Omg lol. You come into someone elses topic then try and change what its about." > (Omg) no I didn't. This is a public forum and I typed out a response to a comment. I am "allowed" to type whatever I like. Why do you think you have been empowered to act as a comments police and security force? Lol "He calls you a troll i proved that is what trolls do" > You didn't prove anything. You disproved it. You are the troll not me. And you are awful at it. Lol "and you claim its the topic because its what you want to talk about?" > I never claimed this "So telling you to go talk in a discussion that might be more relivent for what you are talking about is silencing?" > No, it is a feeble and pathetic attempt at silencing and censorship and it didn't work. "I dont think that you understand what silencing means." > You think a lot of odd things, don't you? "Never has this topic been about what your talking about" > Incorrect. The two words were explicitly mentioned in the original comment. I expanded on them. You chose to focus on the word "obesity" and expand on that. I have no interest in exploring that conversation. "sorry for trying to help you understand the topic at hand" > Apology accepted. Maybe stop this strange behaviour and you won't need to apologise again? I didn't request your help in anything and don't need it. "but there is no reason to talk about pandemic and planet again." > Unless I want to and you can't dictate what ideas and thoughts and words I can speak and type, no matter hwo desperate you are to do this. "Its funny people require proof that their lies are lies when you really need to prove them as facts which you did not do." > Is it? I think we've got different ideas about what constitutes something that is funny or amusing. "Nothing that you state is true" > Subjective, sensationalist hyperbole "the burden of proof is on you" > No. Santa Claus does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that he does. Same logic applies to the "pandemic" and the "planet". You are making those crazy claims. Do you have any proof for them? "saying to prove you wrong is a waste of time" > Is it? How interesting (not) "because you do not believe the people who have done tests as being accurate." > Why are you making up thoughts and beliefs in your head and projecting them onto me? I never said this. "You would rather form your own ideas without any proof." > Nope. I ma not sharing ideas or thoughts. I am asking if you have any factual evidence for the spinning planet or the pandemic. It should be very easy to find. If they are the unquestionable, factual reality, you should be able to find proof within seconds that would put the matter to bed instantly. Stop deflecting and provide some facts. Nobody cares what you think about me
1
@alandrian "Dude that is the basis for which governments were formed so groups of people could live. Go eat your poisoned fast food and be happy" Governments are corporations, dum dum. Absolutely clueless. Lol
1
@alandrian All knowledge? Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 Excellent point. One of the many reasons that we don't live on a spinning ball, hurtling through an infinite vacuum of darkness in multiple directions. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 "If the ball isn't spinning, how do you explain the apparent rotation of the cosmos relative to us?" You are assuming the lights in the sky are what you were programmed to believe
1
@horsemumbler1 "Also, if it's not a ball, how come the night sky is completely different depending on which hemisphere you're in?" You are assuming we live on a spinning globe split into two hemispheres to prove you live on a globe split into two hemispheres. (Flawed) theory and speculation
1
@horsemumbler1 No. I answered your question. In order to present the stars and hemispheres as proof that we live on a spinning globe, one has to make a lot of assumptions and "trust" that the definition of the stars and hemispheres are what the high priests in lab coats tell us. You are speculating and offering theory. None of this is proof that you live on a spinning globe. It's proof that you can retrofit some ideas into a theoretical model. The collective cyclical progression demonstrate that you don't live on a spinning ball, hurtling through space. I answered this already The burden of proof is on you. The spinning globe does not exist. It's silly and illogical. I know ALL the theory and fairy tales that you are reciting. I too was programmed with it all many, many decades ago. You are proposing that I accept (flawed) theory as fact. I am rejecting your proposal
1
@horsemumbler1 "No, you're the one making that assumption." Illogical "All I did was ask you to explain why and how we see what you do. " And I answered your question "Can we agree that those people will see the same/different things depending on thei location, or is that a fact you dispute?" People see different things in different places at different times, yes. That's quite a flimsy proposal to define the universe we live in though. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 You are assuming I'm not very good with words and what they mean and trying to belittle me for it. That's called an ad hominem fallacy. Didn't take you long to start attacking my character to try and shut down the discussion, did it? Stop wasting time telling me what you think about me. Do you have any actual proof for your impossible religious cult spinning globe or only flawed, subjective theory and ad hominems?
1
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Er, I politely responded to your inane rambling and you ran away because you couldn't present anything logical to the discussion. Don't be lying to people that you somehow silenced me. You didn't. I think you're a manipulative narcissist. There, we've both called each other names. Where do we go from here...? Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 Well, pursue me into silence then, tough guy. The guy you are talking to tried to and failed miserably. I'm still here and your commie mob hasn't silenced or censored me one bit. Your mob desperately wants to silence me but hasn't silenced one word of mine. I have not been thrown for a loop. You were and gave up. I am not sharing personal ideas or beliefs only facts. That's why you and others are failing spectacularly to censor me. Because you think I am debating feelings when I am, in fact, sharing facts. You are not trying to convince me of reality. You are trying to get me to concede that theory is reality. I have not run out of words for you or anyone here. You are all the ones who stopped talking. Lol
1
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 "And Merry Christmas 🎄" Are you a Christian or a Satanist? Make your mind up. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 Silence and tumbleweed. You are telling others that you have cleverly cornered and silenced me when you are the one who talked yourself into a corner and disappeared. Gaslighting and cognitive dissonance. And you still don't live on a spinning ball - that's a fact. And there hasn't been an invisible bat soup flu floating around the sky of this non-existent spinning ball for the last two years - another fact. Why would anyone possibly believe that these ridiculous conspiracy theories are real?! Lmao
1
@horsemumbler1 Can you please stop rambling and provide me with actual proof of your religious cult, impossible spinning ball with water clinging to it? You are making the ludicrous claim. The burden of proof is on you. Stop deflecting. I haven't run away from anything from anyone. I am pro-actively steering the conversation away from the subjective theory and asking that we establish the objective factual reality. Are you interested in doing the same or is this merely an ego contest for you?
1
@horsemumbler1 "A fact is a claim backed by incontrovertible essence. If no evidence nor explanation for a thing can be given, it must be regarded not as fact, but as suspicion. The suspicion may be correct, but it must be demonstrably so to enter into the realm of fact." Agreed. So where is your factual evidence to prove your suspicion that you live on a spinning ball? Lol "I never said anything about thinking you're dealing in feelings. I'm just asking you to present the facts and their evidence as you see them." Yes, as far as I am awre there are no facts that prove the silly spinning ball theory. Do you have any? "You see, if you don't give me evidence for your facts, then the only reason I would have to believe them would be a feeling, and ought we not be men who deal not in feelings, but facts?" Exactly. Unless you can provide me with facts for the spinning ball, the only reason I would have to believe it would be a feeling or blind faith in the $cientific high priests in lab coats. Ought we not be men who deal in facts, not feelings and cartoons and fairy tales...? So, where are your facts to back up your impossible, debunked theory?
1
@horsemumbler1 "You too. No luck needed with people like him: Just give them a real chance to actually explain their ideas and watch them scurry to change the subject. Notice that he's already doing that. He'll probably say something ridiculous like it's not worth his time to explain anything to anyone who doesn't already believe what he has to say, or something equally silly. Or maybe he'll actually prove me wrong. Wouldn't that be interesting?" Stop bitching and posturing like a couple of teenage schoolgirls in the playground and present the facts. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 "I never once claimed the Earth is a spinning ball, nor do I care to make nor defend such a claim." Great! We are in agreement then. Discussion ended. Merry Christmas, mate! (I haven't made ANY claim anywhere about how the World is shaped so there is no expectation for me to defend or explain something that I haven't claimed). Enjoy your holiday (safe in the knowledge that you aren't a meaningless speck of dust on a spinning ball, hurlting through an infinite vaccuum of darkness)
1
@horsemumbler1 No, the original claim was in the original post that we live on a planet (or spinning ball). I pointed out that this was a theory and not a fact. Nobody can provide any factual evidence to back up the original claim that was made and you are instead trying to deflect and reverse the burden of proof back onto me. You stand corrected, sir
1
@horsemumbler1 I haven't run away anywhere. You have now spent hours talking and bitching about me and avoided presenting any factual evidence to back up the silly claim that we live on a spinning "planet". Stop deflecting and start presenting facts. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 I'm not denying anything. The parameters for the claims and discussion are clearly set out. I am taking us back to the original claim not running away from anything. I am not a "kiddo". Stop with the pathetic ad hominem fallacies already... I haven't made any claims. The original comment claimed we live on a "planet". I have asked (for days now) if there was any factual evidence to back up this claim. And you are now trying to flip the burden of proof back onto me. But that's not how it works (kiddo). There are no facts for me to give you. We don't live on a spinning planet. If we did, I could provide you with PLENTY of facts. But there are none. Only theories
1
@horsemumbler1 Why are you calling me "kid"? I am a retired man. Lol. STOP the childish ad hominems to try and get your point across. Do you have any facts for the spinning planet or not? If you don't have any then the matter is settled
1
@horsemumbler1 I am a man of facts because I am asking to establish the facts of the matter over subjective theory. If there are no facts to prove that Santa Claus exists then you are a man of facts for accepting that no facts exist to evidence silly, subjective theories. It's a very simple and easy to understand concept. It's not a "feeling" of mine. What facts exist that prove we live on a spinning ball? That's what we are trying to establish. Our respective feelings and beliefs are irrelevant to the factual reality
1
@horsemumbler1 "We don't live on a spinning planet." That's a claim, and you just made it again. That a fact." Maybe, maybe not. But the original claim was that we live on a (spinning) planet. That is the claim that we are trying to prove. If somebody claims that Santa exists and I say we don't, the burden of proof is on the person making the crazy claim not on me. What are you struggling with about this very simple concept? Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 "How about you tell me what you think a planet is and/or isn't, eh? If you can't explain why you think we're not on one, can you at least do that much?" No, how about we stick to the original debate and you provide me with factual evidence for the claim that was made instead of trying to divert the discussion onto my personal beliefs and thoughts (that I have never shared)
1
@horsemumbler1 All the best. Enjoy your Christmas. Thank you for confirming that there is no factual evidence to prove the insane and bonkers conspiracy theory that we live on a spinning globe planet, hurtling through an infinite vaccuum of darkness.
1
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Yeah... probably best not to be handing out medical advice to others if you think there is an invisible bat soup flu floating around the sky... of a spinning planet... that you need to get a jibjab for... even though it won't kill you. Lmao Dr Vladimir, prescriber of fairy tales
1
You don’t seriously believe in that nonsense do you? Lol
1