Comments by "Sergey Bebenin" (@sergeybebenin) on "Ukraine seeks answers as more than 50 PoWs killed - BBC News" video.

@springbloom5940 Just because you stomp your feet and scream FALSE doesn't change the facts. Anyone can look this up
4
@springbloom5940 You are just bluntly lying in hope people don't know the details. Town of Marinka has been under Ukrainian control since they took it back in 2014. It's an indisputable fact. The distance from the center of Marinka to the center of Olenivka is about 10mi. This means the actual front line is even closer... It hasn't moved in this region since 2014ish. Even if it moved, it's still just 10 friggin miles which is nothing for artillery. ruSSia has strike "capability" all over the world. And? Are you some kind of international law lawyer trying to dispute internally recognized POW laws? I've seen plenty of "experts" and it's just pathetic.
2
UN is the most useless organization on this planet
1
@springbloom5940 10km is certainly near when ruSSia could have sent them almost to Alaska border
1
@JelMain In any case many experts already say it was blown up from inside. And even "non experts" can compare this to countless sites since February 24th. It's clear that there was no missile because burned bodies and beds are not really disturbed. When a missile comes, the scene looks like it was after a giant grinder. Anyone can do this comparison. Add to this another fact - no guards even got injured. Those claimed HIMARS fragments can now be found all over Donbass or Kherson region so it means absolutely nothing.
1
@Slavic_Goblin 🤦‍♂️ Olenivka is about 10 miles from Marinka - under Ukrainian control since 2014...which means the front line is even less than 10. This distance is nothing for artillery so no, it's absolutely not "perfectly fine".
1
@springbloom5940 Huh?
1
@Slavic_Goblin What the F are you talking about? There's a Geneva convention.
1
@Slavic_Goblin It's common frigging sense. At least far enough from artillery. 10 miles is nothing for artillery. ruSSo pow are in Lviv region (as far in Ukraine as possible). ruSSian did the opposite - as close to front line as possible... While stretching as far as Alaska
1
@Slavic_Goblin I stopped reading after your first paragraph.. you put words into my mouth. Ukraine moved ruSSo pow as far as possible on own territory. ruSSo occupants placed Ukrainian pow as close as possible to the front line. 10mi is target practice for artillery
1
@Slavic_Goblin Again, I stopped reading your nonsense after first couple of sentences. I'll repeat... Ukraine moved PoWs as far as is possible could (other side of Ukraine). Ukraine did the absolute maximum. ruSSia did the absolute minimum by placing PoWs as close to the front line as possible instead going deep into ruSSia. 10mi is target practice for artillery and by no means a "safe zone"... This is in fact a war zone because artillery is the key, and most used element of this war. What I said are indisputable facts.
1
@fintonmainz7845 this was 10km from the front line.... Hello. ruSSia stretches all the way to Alaska so plenty of space. In any case many experts already say it was blown up from inside. And even "non experts" can compare this to countless of sites since February 24th. It's clear that there was no missile because burned bodies and beds are not really disturbed. When a missile comes, the scene looks like it was after a giant grinder.
1
@fintonmainz7845 1. I meant to say 10miles. It's a fact anyone can look up on the map. 2. I never said anything about "absolute proof". You said it for me and then started to make up a story.
1
@РоманСаратов-у9и ruSSo fascists trying to piss off the locals population for mobilization purposes is nothing new. Traveling mortars is a very well documented story from 2014 and Bolotov was even killed for telling this story.
1
@fintonmainz7845 That's really all you got for response? 🤣 Good
1
@fintonmainz7845 Says someone that just blabbers nonsense for a response
1
@РоманСаратов-у9и 😳..huh?
1