Comments by "Sergey Bebenin" (@sergeybebenin) on "NATO pledges more Ukraine support over winter | DW News" video.

@dardoura maybe, you can go talk about this under a video about Israel
2
@Peter Andre huh? Why would the USA nuke Cuba if Cuba is fighting back for survival from USA's attempt to annex it? You aren't making any sense. No one on this planet even talks about using nukes as a retaliation for conventional weapons use as a DEFENCE!
1
@Gudang9 um, no. Nukes are off the table because China told them so. Modern weapons? What are you 🚬? You don't turn to Iran for help if you have modern weapons
1
@naturewonderslive4169 🤦‍♂️ Ukraine already has, are YOU dumb?
1
@Gudang9 um, no. ruSSia is doing so badly that they had up call up mobilization for the first time since ww2. Don't even try telling me that this is going "according to plan". All their "modern weapons" are already in Ukraine and most of them already scrap metal
1
@naturewonderslive4169 huh? I said Ukraine is already striking ruSSo territory. Seems like you live in a bubble
1
@Gudang9 so you can't respond normally? This means you have no counter argument. LoL
1
@Gudang9 clown, the terrorist attacks is a different topic.
1
@Gudang9 you are claiming that have something else more modern that they haven't used. Cruise missiles from the Soviet era is all they got in reality. And they use it on civilians to make Ukraine accept ruSSo terms. This is what Kremlin officially says and this is by definition terrorism. Read the definition
1
@Gudang9 clown, nukes exist and we know about it. You are claiming there are some secret unknown modern weapons that haven't been used yet. Well, at this rate I can say that Ukraine has flying saucers but they are saving them "for later". Find me a quote from NATO/USA stating something "all civilian suffering can end right now if you meet our demands". Did is literally what the Kremlin says. And oh how convenient to just throw in a word "war" and this automatic justifies everything that takes place. Guess what, Ukraine didn't start any wars (like the Balkans war NATO STOPPED). Ukraine did not have a dictator that periodically attacked neighbors and gassed own people (like Iraq). Waste of my time here. Your responses are already visible to everyone to see so my job here is done.... Just another ruSSo patriot
1
@atleastimtrying5391 yes. And Ukraine has been doing it for months. Belgorod and Kursk are part of RF last time I checked
1
@atleastimtrying5391 Ukrainians are hitting military targets so we'll never hear exactly what they accomplished or not. In any case, my point is that striking RF territory clearly doesn't automatically translate to using nukes. It also makes no sense no matter how you look at it. Even their doctrine states that they will use nukes only if "RF existence is threatened"
1
@atleastimtrying5391 they don't. Otherwise they'd use them instead of calling up mobilization for the first time since ww2. Kherson would be a perfect place for them to use a Moab. All open fields
1
NATO did not start that war. In fact, NATO put an end to ethnic cleansing. You are comparing apples to hamburgers
1
@bhaashatepe5234 I got news for you. NATO cares about what's affecting them. It's a defensive alliance, not a world police. If you have issues with what you mentioned, start a petition in countries near by
1
@dardoura 👌 next time there's war like this one you can complain if NATO doesn't help. But we are here right now so
1
@draganpapic1506 🤦‍♂️ UN is a useless organization and this a clear evidence to this. It's a fact that NATO put an end to ethnic massacre and that's the bottom line. If NATO didn't intervene, a lot more people would die and who knows what would become of Europe in this region. This was happening literally on the doorsteps of NATO and of course they intervened to stop it. Sounds like you are just another but hurt Serb. Lots of clones like you.
1
@draganpapic1506 🤡🤣 whatever makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
1