Comments by "Sergey Bebenin" (@sergeybebenin) on "Inside the Ukraine-controlled Kursk region in Russia | DW News" video.

You forgot to tell that to NATO because they still haven't showed up
14
Who's supposed to authorize this entry if Ukraine is running the local government now? 🤦‍♂️ Gotta love YouTube couch lawyers 🤣
5
 @piratesofthebarentssea 😂 Ukraine already established local government so this journalist crossed because it was an agreement with the new local government. We can play this game too, bud
4
@kenigoni5056 stop whining. russia lost all such rights when they shredded all possible international agreements and laws in 2022 (actually in 2014). They don't fall under international law jurisdiction anymore. Anything goes. That's what they wanted
4
 @ыыыыыыыыыы you should look up the maps of Ukraine People's Republic from 1918 but most importantly, linguistic maps in the late 19th century. Historicly documented facts, bud
2
 @ISthreetank 🤡 you know exactly what he meant.
2
@ыыыыыыыыыы doesn't change the fact that it's a historic Ukrainian land
2
@ыыыыыыыыыы 🤦‍♂️ do you understand what a linguistic map is? It quite literally means that ethnic Ukrainians historically lived in southern Kursk and Belgorod regions. That's why even today you'll see older people speaking Ukrainian in Kursk where Ukraine just entered. russians never historically populated France or Germany
2
 @Givemeproofkid when? When is the referendum in Kyiv? I need to know
2
@vladimirpopovic8471 I guess. At least you aren't disputing genocide. I mean I can just tell that you aren't a fan of USA and I'm sure you believe that USA committed war crimes. So if they are not recognizing this court (to protect themselves) then this court is legit.
2
@fiksaciya_shpindelya 🤣 how cute. I guess you didn't know that your master putin was dreaming of joining NATO in 2000. So russia lost sovereignty before Ukraine, going by your logic
2
@fiksaciya_shpindelya you are just adorable 🤣 Couple of facts for you: 1. Ukraine only mentioned NATO ambitions in 2008. No path to membership was offered and vast majority of Ukrainians were against it. 2. In 2010 parliament voted to drop the NATO "goal". Indisputable historically recorded fact. 3. russia annexed Crimea and occupied parts of eastern Ukraine in early spring of 2014 when Ukraine was defacto and dejure neutral. Ukraine stayed that way all the way into December 2014. For common sense reasons NATO is a must after such actions by russia. 4. There's no agreement of any kind that prohibits Ukraine from joining NATO or especially the EU.
2
@Luiz-w5s 🤣 no. Ukraine is defending by stretching russo formations and destroying russo infrastructure.
1
@suprotyv7534 🤣 that territory is currently under Ukraine control, bud. Cope
1
@anna_aituze6618 🤣 again? I heard this before a number of times
1
@tornado-s-2012 Ukraine has applied the traditional "kutuzov theory" sacrificing territory to buy time. Absolutely obliviated territory they are taking in Eastern Ukraine is useless and will be impossible to hold long term, especially throughout winters and swamp seasons. In vast majority of places it's either open farm fields or Lunar-like surface from destroyed settlements. All infrastructure is gone and logistics stretches far. It will remain this way until it's freed from occupants. This isn't the case with Kursk territory and Ukraine has natural barriers working for them - river, which russians aren't capable of crossing in meaningful numbers
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Because Putin lost his mind. It's really not much different than WW2. Are you going to tell me WW2 was meaningful? 🤦‍♂️
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 no, but I heard about pontoon (not pantun) bridges meeting Mr HIMARS. Haven't you seen the videos LMAO?
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 🤦‍♂️🤣 your comment is so bad that YouTube even doesn't want to show it to public. It doesn't matter how many they have. What matters is how many are spanning the river and the answer is ZERO. At least 3 tried to but trying and failing doesn't count🤣
1
@piratesofthebarentssea so what exactly don't you like in this situation?
1
@piratesofthebarentssea putin says everything is going to plan
1
@vladimirpopovic8471 me? I'm from Ukraine. Sounds like you have a grudge but leave me out of this
1
@vladimirpopovic8471 NATO stepped in and stopped an genocidal war. Didn't international war crime court hearings teach you anything? Srebrenica? No? Doesn't ring a bell? Take your grudge elsewhere, bud. Really couldn't care less. If NATO ends up bombing russia (hypothetically speaking), are you also going to call them aggressors? 🤦‍♂️
1
@fiksaciya_shpindelya 🤣 I just love how you conveniently ignored every fact I listed. For simplicity, let's just ignore everything I said except the INDISPUTABLE AND VERIFIABLE FACT that in 2010 Ukraine officially (as in, parliament vote) dropped NATO dream. Patiently waiting to hear your response. Also. How come russia didn't do anything from 2008 and 2010? Oh and lastly, this isn't a guarantee... It's simply an INTENTION. "The Ukrainian SSR solemnly declares its intention of becoming a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocs and adheres to three nuclear free principles: to accept, to produce and to purchase no nuclear weapons." This isn't an agreement with russia in any way LMAO. It's just a DECLARATION by Ukrainian parliament. LEARN definitions 🤦‍♂️
1
@Villbl4 When did foreign troops invade Russian Federation, until this time? I'll patiently wait for your answer
1
@Villbl4 🤣 bud, what you don't understand is that armies of russo empire and USSR in large part consisted of Ukrainian, Belarusian (at one point Polish and Finish) people plus many other Soviet Republics. Hate to break it to you but even Belarus is not fighting in your ranks today 🤣. In WW2, it took the Soviet army about 1,5 months to liberate entire Donbas region. And German army was obviously a lot bigger than today's Ukrainian army. That pretty much says it all. Now, carry on with your дидыВаивали blabbering. No one cares
1