Comments by "Sergey Bebenin" (@sergeybebenin) on "Sky News" channel.

  1. This interview could have ended at 1:20. I mean, if he admitted himself that he has no clue what ruSSian plans/goals are then what's the point to continue?
    54
  2. ​ @deltaboy2011 really? Is that why Oryx confirmed losses are at least double on ruZia side?
    14
  3. Isn't the government elected in Georgia?
    11
  4. ​ @raykeane9345  in modern history USA/UK haven't annexed anything. In fact, they've given up their imperial ambitions
    10
  5. 1. They have the numbers. 2. Clearly they don't care about losses so logic doesn't apply here
    9
  6. @Vegan Zombie 🤦‍♂️ gotta be sarcasm
    7
  7. Hence the quotation marks
    6
  8. What about them? Ukraine is defending itself from ruSSo occupants.... Common sense. Give Ukraine a 3rd party escort in the sea and guarantees that ruSSo Fascists won't take advantage of open ports and there won't be any issues de-mining the ports. This is literally what Ukraine is asking
    5
  9. ​ @testingmysoup5678 numb brain, let's see... Crimea is dejure and defacto and occupied territory. Ukraine never allowed this bridge to be built. This bridge is the primary road for military supplies and equipment. This bridge has already been targeted. Ukraine officially called for ruZians NOT to go to Crimea because it'll be a war zone. Lesson for ruzia - don't use civilians as shields.
    5
  10.  @dedameda199  1. Azerbaijan was liberating their internationally recognized territory. 2. USA and UK signed Budapest Memorandum, hence they have obligations
    4
  11.  @prasanta5139  risk????🤦‍♂️
    3
  12. 👍🤦‍♂️ Putin works for Biden then? Because this is the only logical conclusion based on your rambling
    3
  13.  @monopalle5768  true that 👍
    3
  14.  @MegrelMamba  no. Georgians wouldn't allow it, this isn't rusZia or Belarus.
    3
  15.  @AnthonyCarroll-ue3uv  Source: trust me bro. Gotta love it 😂
    3
  16.  @alainpannetier2543  don't feed the tr0ll.
    2
  17.  @Rin-qj7zt  well, in this case they should stop whining about civilian casualties and calling it a terrorist attack
    2
  18.  @gam.remarque  Your house of cards has collapsed years ago. Everyone knows that russia occupied parts of Ukraine
    2
  19. ​ @scottishsimon8996 yeah because they can hold Lunar-like surface (what used to be towns) /farm fields indefinitely 🤦‍♂️
    2
  20.  @christianvachon2235  Yes Turkey talked to ruSSia and they came up with this idea. Unfortunately ruSSia said they will be inspecting every ship and Turkey said they cannot give Ukraine any guarantees. Obviously.... Who in their right mind will believe ruSSia??? Ukraine isn't asking for NATO escort. Ukraine is asking for an international coalition to escort ships and for 3rd parties to guarantee the safety of Ukraine ports. This is all common sense after everything that happened.
    2
  21. ​ @MrNoClueAtAll  his evidence is "trust me bro"
    2
  22. Huh? There are millions of men of the "right age" not on the front lines. And?
    2
  23. Ukraine officially stated this multiple times. Anyone on this bridge is knowingly risking their life. I'll be targeted until it's completely cut off
    2
  24. 🤦‍♂️ what a bunch of BS. Kherson isn't even Donbass. At least learn basic geography
    2
  25.  @joshi6898  🤦‍♂️ NATO? How about civilized world? LoL ruSSo fascist empire assets are frozen because ruSSo fascists empire occupied Ukraine. It's ok though, ruSSia will be paying for everything probably 100+ years like Germany
    1
  26.  @christianvachon2235  ruSSia isn't sanctioned to export food. This is lies
    1
  27.  @ldo1308  Considering they already occupied parts of Ukraine, odds are they'll go further
    1
  28. Ukraine was defacto and dejure neutral when parts of it got occupied in 2014.
    1
  29. Russian threat being used? It doesn't have to be "used". Ruszia is doing an excellent job promoting it
    1
  30.  @jasminebali8068  It's both actually.
    1
  31. This ruSSian employee can 🖕
    1
  32. It is a neutral country 😳
    1
  33.  @contractorvegas5384  And Finland and Sweden are literally crossing the doorway into NATO as we speak (likely just weeks away). No issue for ruSSians even though it makes NATO even closer to strategic cities than Ukraine would? Something doesn't add up, does it? By the way, the petition was shelved in 2010 and Ukraine was partly occupied in 2014. Only in 2015 Ukraine reinstated the goal to join NATO
    1
  34. Please don't pretend developing nations live in a bubble with their own grain prices. It's a FACT that grain prices already went up 8% last week.
    1
  35. Ummm no. Occupying soldiers are criminals, especially those that kill defenders of Ukraine
    1
  36.  @koreywitabagg665  Who? Did what in 2014? 🤦‍♂️ Ukrainian president is asking for help, in fact more help. He's simply saying that stirring up panic in the country is making it more difficult.
    1
  37. Most don't care if Russia kills neighbors. Lots are pro war. About 7-10% are against
    1
  38. Um, ruSSo goals were and still are: - demilitarization (when in fact Ukraine military moved up 7 points in world ratings) - denazification (made up word for taking down government) - Donbass "liberation" (when they can't even take a small town for the last 6mo)
    1
  39. Ukraine will never starve. Ukraine doesn't know where to store this year's harvest because silos are full
    1
  40.  @christianvachon2235  There is proof. It's on video... Columns of trucks going from the newly occupied Ukraine territories to Crimea. People posting videos and pictures. Locals are witnessing all of this. Satellite pictures.... We aren't talking a theft of some artwork from a museum. It's millions of tones of grain! Can't hide it.
    1
  41. Ukraine is defending itself from ruSSo occupants.... Common sense. Give Ukraine a 3rd party escort in the sea and guarantees that ruSSo Fascists won't take advantage of open ports and there won't be any issues de-mining the ports. This is literally what Ukraine is asking
    1
  42.  @christianvachon2235  ruSSia isn't sanctioned to export grain or food. This is a lie
    1
  43. ​ @testingmysoup5678  um no. UN war crime investigators (and other independent foreign investigators) say it's true.
    1
  44. Yes of course Ukraine placed mines near ports... Because ruSSians wanted to invade from the sea and still will if there's no guarantee from 3rd parties. ruSSia is blocking Ukrainian ports because they are officially stating that they want to inspect every ship going in/out of Ukraine. It's literally a definition of a blockade. In any case, cannot believe ruSSians when they say they won't enter ports if ports are de-mined. Ukraine needs 3rd party guarantees and protection. And by the way, ruSSians also mined on their side as well.
    1
  45.  @ilaser4064  A full scale attack on Ukraine on February24 also made no sense (what happened since is a solid proof). WW1 started for the silliest reason... the rest is history. My point is - don't assume that ruSSians are using strategic thinking or logic when they make decisions.
    1
  46.  @felipe-vibor  yeah, trust me bro. 🤣. Followed by "it's public knowledge"
    1
  47. Just skip to 1:24 - the best part :)
    1