Comments by "Sergey Bebenin" (@sergeybebenin) on "CaspianReport" channel.

  1. It's not about NATO.... NATO blabber was pre-war sand in the West's eyes so to speak. In reality it's not much different from Hitler's agenda in 1939. Just a few days ago Ria News (main state outlet) related an article with their actual goals in Ukraine. Black on white it literally states that Ukraine cannot exist and must be de-Ukrainized, de-Europenized, institutions destroyed and no Marshall plan of any kind allowed. By de-Ukrainized they mean exterminate or deport most of Ukrainians (they finally agree that ruSSians aren't welcome). Take this. Take the intel. mention of "kill lists". Take the horrors of freed territories and it all adds up - ruSSia is a Fascist Federation with a goal to wipe out a nation.
    1
  2. It's mind boggling Germany pretty much killed their army and became entirely dependent on ruSSo energy in the span of Putin rule. Something tells me it's not a coincidence ex head of Germany is now working for ruSSian state gas company
    1
  3. No matter who would be in charge, corruption would still prevail. Anyone who's against corruption in Russia is a total moron.
    1
  4.  @mikitz  to produce new ruSSia need western technologies and lots of money. They don't have access to technology anymore and soon won't have money to spare.
    1
  5. "their" territory? It's not their territory. USSR lost in Afghanistan. USSR lost in Finland. USSR lost in Baltic states. Today at least 40 countries (including most powerful) are fully supporting Ukraine unlike anything since WW2.
    1
  6. 😂 Why would China unite with Russia? They just need it for resources. China needs advanced countries and economies to make $$ and it ain't ruSSia
    1
  7. It's a fact. I guess by your "logic" ruSSo fascists that died on the outskirts of Kyiv were just kamikazes to "divert attention". 😂
    1
  8. He's going by what ruSSo fascists are stating themselves.
    1
  9. You are already on full financial support by russia. Your population is tiny, doesn't except much and is dominated by the "waiters" (as in waiting for changes). So there's no threat to russia like Chechnya for example. There aren't any more sanctions left that russia even cares about. Belarus is already defacto annexed and it's just dejure details that will be slowly (covertly) ironed out before you even realize it. You guys lost your freedom but at least don't pretend it's going to magically fall back into your hands some day just because one of the dictators dies. It doesn't work like this
    1
  10. Ukrainian air defense is five times bigger than Iraqi air defense during Iraq war. Iraq shut down about 70 military airplanes helicopters of USA led coalition (more advanced and better trained than russia). Do the math. Ukraine will literally erase Russian Air Force capability for decades to come. I'm not even talking about javelins, Stingers, And all other kinds of goodies the West just delivered
    1
  11. ruSSo insanity surely reshaping entire Europe
    1
  12. Your boy Lancaster is Graham Phillips v2.0. Only this time this bs ruSSo propaganda is clear as day
    1
  13. Exceptional analysis 👍
    1
  14. And even after Putler is dead. Russians must go through the same process as Germans went through after WW2. If they don't do it, there's no reason to lift the sanctions
    1
  15.  @theoderic_l  👍 good analysts. China will simply use russia for super cheap resources. Majority of money China makes in Europe, north America and basically countries that are sanctioning russia. So obviously it doesn't want to end this nice relationship
    1
  16.  @simontuffs4106  😂 yeah, because a handful of subs will feed the country
    1
  17.  @nemanjastikic1367  Dude, even before February, Russian economy was SMALLER than Italian. It's nothing on the world scale. Now it's going to be decimated by biggest sanctions in history on any nation. You can list countries all you want but like I said, russian economy was tiny before this war and now it's going to be a lot worse with nothing good in sight. Just an eye opening fact for you - before February 24th, minimum wage in Ukraine was like $50 higher than in russia (which is very decent money over there). Average salary was creeping up to match russian average salary. THAT is how "strong" russian economy was.
    1
  18.  @tamerlane7  you are comparing a journalist murder to genocide of Ukrainians using all means short of nukes? 🤦‍♂️ Quarter of the entire population has already been displaced - 10 million and it's causing a huge burden on Europe. Sorry, time will not "heal" this. You are comparing apples and hammer
    1
  19. It's a lot simpler than that. ruSSia is trying to rebuild USSR (even if not in the same borders). Their goal is to take over as much land as possible at any cost. End of story. Yes, it sounds crazy in 21 century but this is what happens when a group of geezer dictators from Soviet era feel invincible and lose their minds.
    1
  20.  @nostalgiainfinity  🤦‍♂️ You mean "west" spit in Russian face by feeding Russia, paying Russian pensions and building factories there? Russia should be thanking for such "spit"
    1
  21.  @khanhnguyen-tt3ff  Why in the world would China want to invade moscow? They'll just take what they can up north along the border. Tame your imagination LoL
    1
  22.  @klauskant8086  Yea that makes perfect "sense". NATO forced ruSSia to occupy Ukraine in 2014 and openly declare in 2022 that Ukraine is actually ruSSian territory. NATO also made ruSSia indiscriminately bomb Ukraine into stone age. Did NATO also force ruSSians to rape, torture and loot?
    1
  23.  @testingmysoup5678  🤦‍♂️ 1. This is your nonsensical assumption. 2. Sweden and Finland are basically NATO now and ruSSia isn't even saying much, not even talking about actions. So your NATO excuse is moronic
    1
  24.  @testingmysoup5678  Talk about stupid 🤦‍♂️ I already responded to you above. You are talking nonsensical bs that doesn't align with reality
    1
  25. Why in the world would they need to "teleport" when there's are countless ways to transport over land 🤦‍♂️ Ukraine has problems but so do ruSSo fascists. That's why they are stuck where they are
    1
  26. Look at the map you posted yourself. Do you really believe it's "separatists" on this tiny patch of land that are holding back or even threading offensive? It's just an extension of russia today
    1
  27. We don't want anyone's land, especially with fascist russian population. But we'll take all their money... For the next 50+ years
    1
  28. Multiple ships
    1
  29. What technology transfer? I don't know why would India want to "transfer" technology that is being turned to scrap in Ukraine using the most basic Western weapons. If India is smart and wants to have a capable army, they should "transfer" Western technologies
    1
  30.  @Nubbdy  1. Based on what you've seen (burned equipment on the ground and in the air) and non stop lies from Russia, what makes you think their other technology is any better? Logic tells you it's not. 2. My point precisely. China is using inferior Russian tech. If you want to defend yourself against it, you gotta go with modern and proven Western tech
    1
  31.  @Nubbdy  For West to start helping, you need to at least show support for Western "Values". Ukraine was in a much worse situation before 2014 and now getting full support from the West because we picked Western integration. You can't sit on both stools at once. Pick your side. If you can't make a pick even at this point in history, then don't expect any help from the "West". I guess stick with russia. Only their technology will remain on 20th century levels,. especially now that sanctions are in full swing
    1
  32.  @Nubbdy  I'm not gonna read your whining. If you don't want to have the best tech to defend your country, then don't. By Western Values I mean freedom and quality of life everyone in Europe enjoys. This is what Ukraine wants as well and Russia does not. Now go on with your unrelated whining. Only I still don't understand how this is related to picking the right side in Ukrainian genocide talking place as we speak
    1
  33.  @Nubbdy  By the way, if USA "values" are so bad, why is there such a huge Indian community? I think we both know why... Because life is better in "western" civilization
    1
  34.  @Nubbdy  Of course it will survive. If it won't, it means it's a nuclear war and the entire world is gone in this case
    1
  35.  @Nubbdy  how else can an army of about 200k defeat a country of 40 million with an army of at least 250k? Not even talking about crushing sanctions on russia and all the help to Ukraine. It's pretty evident that russians have stalled.
    1
  36.  @AeneasGemini  Government? Is the "government" raping, torturing and killing civilians? Is the "government" talking about extermination of Ukraine as a nation? You are so clueless that I'm pretty certain you either live far away from ruSSia (no threat to you and little experience) or you are one of them
    1
  37.  @restlessnative781  It's already happening lol. 1 year full scale war and look what ruSSians got.
    1
  38.  @strength4147  it was made clear to Putler that he can't use nukes. China, India and "west" made it clear. That "if" has been thrown around for over a year now and clearly is just a bluff. Do you remember Putler's speech just before February 24? "If anyone even attempts to help Ukraine, they will experience a response unlike anything the world has ever seen". Something along these lines 🤣
    1
  39.  @alexwestconsulting  1. Your premise that it's populated by a hostile population is nonsense. In any case people most people will evacuated just as they did in Kherson. 2. It's 3 bridges right next to each other. No one except you even considers them as separate. Even the last attempt to take one down actually damaged two. Not even sure what you mean by "bridge is on ruSSo controlled land". 3. I'm very patiently waiting for you to provide me with a reference to a war crime description about Crimea water channel. Clowns like you love to throw stuff at the wall hoping it sticks... Well, I'm not just gonna let it stick.
    1
  40.  @alexwestconsulting  1. I'm an ethnic russian Ukrainian and loath ruSSia with all my heart so I just skipped your essay to what I was interested in - point me to a war crime description in legal documents. You failed to do so because it doesn't exist so you are a clown for insisting on your baseless claims. Ukraine simply stopped supplying occupied terrories. Per Geneva convention, occupied terrories are full responsibility of occupants. The Crimean water channel is an artificial structure so it was closed as were all other "connections". So easy to shut you up "The occupying power has the duty to ensure that the adequate provision of food and medical supplies is provided, as well as clothing, bedding, means of shelter, other supplies essential to the survival of the civilian population of the occupied territory, and objects necessary for religious worship (GCIV Arts. 55, 58; API Art. 69)."
    1
  41.  @alexwestconsulting  lmao 🤣 There was enough water for civilians well being. LMAO 🤣. Or maybe you have a video of a children dying from thirst? 🤣. Clearly you have never been to Crimea because you'd know that water for regular people is everywhere.. it's not a desert 😂 But to operate ruSSo occupant military machine and economy surely not enough. And my quote from Geneva convention explicitly calls out that anything that happens on occupied territories is the responsibility of the occupant. So again, you are a clown. Not a single world government (except ruSSia of course) calls the cut off water channel a war crime.... Because it's not
    1
  42.  @nathangale7702  it was cut off land wise but the bridge was built specifically because they could barely sustain occupation via boats. That was in times when Ukraine wasn't fighting back. Now it's a full scale war and Ukraine has the right and means (at least it's getting there) to do whatever it needs to do. So, if Ukraine cuts off the land bridge again and takes the bridge under "strike control", ruSSians will be in a similar situation as Kherson. Because those boats they used in 2014-15 will also be under strikes like they were in Kherson. So Ukrainians can in theory keep striking and making occupants lives so difficult that they simply will leave like they did from the "Russian city of Kherson". I don't understand why some people suggest this has to be done similar to WW2... Weapons have changed
    1
  43.  @alexwestconsulting  It's an indisputable fact that Crimea always had enough water even for domestic use. I'm not even talking about drinking. Yes, there was a time when it was rationed, as in - stopped for a few hours. But we are talking water in the FAUCET 🤣🤣. You know, to wash hands and flush the 🚽. So again you are clueless and no proof. Water supply in the channel was for agriculture (that was being shipped all over Ukraine and the world) as well as manufacturing. In case you didn't know, this channel was built in the middle of last century and believe it or not, people LIVED there BEFORE it was built LMAO 😂. Wow. Maybe they were special kind of people that didn't need water to survive? So again, you are a clown in a corner trying to weasel yourself out on lying but it ain't working.
    1
  44.  @mezjean5966  what's so strategic about it? Black Sea is a NATO controlled bathtub
    1
  45.  @mezjean5966  They already have one in Novorossiysk. And they can't exist Black Sea anyway without NATO consent. I have to repeat my question
    1
  46.  @mezjean5966  OK.... Wouldn't it be cheaper and strategically better for ruSSia to simply expand the existing one instead of: - killing 100+k of own citizens (I know they don't care about Ukraine so I'm not even talking about it) - destroying all economical ties and channels they've inherited from decades in USSR and building on top of it - being under the most severe sanctions in human history - uniting NATO as never before - literally expanding NATO via Sweden and Finland (2 signatures away from the total of 30) ...all this instead of just expanding an existing naval base? Really? Your explanation about Crimean base doesn't make any sense.
    1
  47.  @mezjean5966  huh? Please look at where Novorossiysk is located. You are extremely confused
    1
  48.  @joshbell5387  is that why ruSSia is buying from Iran and North Korea? Because they are "manufacturing"? Facts of life - ruSSo world GDP is 1.5% - UA allies world GDP is about 60%
    1
  49.  @joshbell5387  really? That's your excuse. I'm going to play the same game with you then 1. Ukraine is getting help from allies for the long run. 2. Ukraine is now shelling about the same as ruSSians. 3. How do people ignore the fact that Putler is forced to beg for weapons N Korea and Iran. I can go on and on. See how easy it is? I posted facts backed up by numbers. You posted blabber.
    1
  50.  @MmmM-uo6ti  did I hurt your feelings? Ukraine isn't NATO and is fighting on own land against occupants. 🤡
    1