Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "ABC News" channel.

  1. ​ @TreyAGeek Her father is Jamaican.
    5
  2.  sonds m  You're forgetting that criminals don't abide by the law.
    5
  3.  @jonathanharper2418  Well, it's really not an interpretation. It's plain English, "shall not be infringed." Almost all gun control laws are unconstitutional.
    4
  4.  @pre4122  It says the right of the people to bear arms. There are two clauses in that amendment. Arms means firearms; the founders did not explicitly say which models because they always assumed that private citizens should be just as well armed as the military. Restricting certain types of firearms is an infringement upon our rights.
    4
  5.  @thejdgoodwin  He's right, and you know he is.
    4
  6. Exactly correct. He's trying to exploit the ignorance of people who don't know any better. This is a telltale sign of obfuscation and willful deceit.
    4
  7. Opportunity and work is not a valid asylum claim.
    4
  8. Why do you need to "explain" same sex parents to a 5 year old child?
    4
  9. We're now officially a third world country.
    4
  10. ​ @Repdem No, it's true.
    4
  11. Immigrants don't illegally cross the border.
    4
  12. @agent00soul48 No. Wanting a secure border and vetting legal immigrants is common sense, not Naziism. Seriously, what is wrong with you people?
    4
  13.  @radicallymoderateryan9362  Exactly. It's so obvious...anyone who can't see this is just delusional.
    4
  14. ​ @SKaka-mo5xz  It was sarcasm.
    4
  15. ​ @DriveInFreak  The wall was not meant to stop crossings entirely. The wall was but one component of a border security apparatus. Border patrol wanted the wall to serve as a force multiplier, not as a complete solution. This is why you need to do your research and try to stay clear of false and distorted media narratives. The wall was extremely effective at slowing down illegal crossings, thus providing time for border patrol to respond....this is how force multipliers work. This is a well known concept in military science.
    3
  16. ​ @SixStringSteveDelivers  You are absolutely correct. The wall is not meant to be a single solution, it is being used as a force multiplier, and it is extremely effective in that regard.
    3
  17.  @jonathanharper2418  I don't agree. I think we make things more complicated than they need to be. If we think our 2A right needs to change, then we propose an amendment and ratify it, but using leaps of logic and jumping through hoops in order to circumvent that process and restrict our rights is slap in the face. I am tired of this increasingly authoritarian government's disregard for the Constitutional rule of law. These bureaucrats and elected officials have forgotten their roles...they seem to believe they are superior to the people.
    3
  18.  @jonathanharper2418  I'm sorry you feel that way about our rights and the Constitution. There must be a foundation of principles not tied to emotion or whim, and to dismiss that foundation because it's inconvenient or difficult turns us into a nation of men, not of law.
    3
  19. ​ @stan4now You mean there is no unedited version, because you know they burned it.
    3
  20.  @Repdem  No, it isn't.
    3
  21. ​ @maplelatte3366 They would have been gone if TPS wasn't extended.
    3
  22. Don't you mean to clean up the FBI and to ensure it works on behalf of American citizens instead of against.
    3
  23. Then why do they release the cop's name when the cop takes out a murderer? Cops could also be retaliated against.
    3
  24. How is America racist? It's not. There are racist people, they will always exist, but America is not wholly racist.
    3
  25. LOL. You people are hilarious.
    3
  26. If it's even true.
    3
  27.  @gloin10  I don't think so, but you could be right. Just remember, no party to this is telling the truth.
    3
  28. Why should it? She destroyed evidence under subpoena, that's a crime.
    3
  29. Me too. Depressing. I miss the 80s. I think I'm going to call some old friends.
    3
  30. That's dumb.
    3
  31. ​@agent00soul48No, it isn't.
    3
  32.  @InanaNinsianna  Empty and soulless is more like it.
    3
  33. Well, I guess Satan would choose hell.
    3
  34.  @tiffanystrand4423  Be honest, everything makes your blood boil. I bet a US flag flying from a pickup truck makes your blood boil.
    3
  35.  @whiskeybrown262  I'm not giving up my rights because others are irresponsible.
    3
  36. The cops made a dumb decision to kick down a door without knowing what was behind it. They were too impatient. Their egos got them hurt and killed.
    2
  37. Yes, because the audio tape (probably a deep fake, anyway) shows the very document he was holding. 🤡
    2
  38. Wake TSI and Cyfir are professional companies and very competent. The two very limited audits done before this were also done by private companies without EAC certification.
    2
  39. Unfortunately he's not only an illegitimate president, he's also a puppet serving those who want to destroy America.
    2
  40. Donald Trump loves America and wants security and prosperity for all citizens, no matter their education.
    2
  41.  @jonathanharper2418  I hear you and even agree with some of your points, I am just more of a strict originalist. My concern is with the fallibility of man. Any changes should be done carefully, incrementally, and with great deliberation to mitigate unintended consequences of emotional decisions or knee jerk reactions. I am of the belief that should a law become so detached from the will of the people, that sufficient efforts will be motivated to change it. In my opinion, it's not enough that a loud minority or simple majority disagree with a law. I do appreciate the polite and substantive discussion. I just think you have more trust in humankind than I do.
    2
  42.  @jonathanharper2418   I agree, I think the conservative court is one of the reasons it was overturned. Conservatives tend to want to stick to the original interpretation. However, I don't think they are playing politics, I just think it just demonstrates the different approaches to Constitutional interpretation. For example, Sotomayor was asking questions about covid death rates during the hearing on mask mandates. I was thinking "why is she asking that, what does that have to do with the Constitution and the natural right to not be forced or coerced into taking an experimental drug?"
    2
  43. ​ @kevinsullivan4156 Vlad wants Kamala.
    2
  44. 451
    2
  45. I doubt they will go anywhere, but we'll see.
    2
  46. Political persecution, plain and simple.
    2
  47. When are the rebuttal witnesses going to testify?
    2
  48.  @mananimal3644  Because Trump policies were good for America. Maybe take a look at the extensive damage Beijing Biden has done in just 100 days.
    2
  49.  @Patricia-zt8ub  Abbott is a con man. He needs to defend the border and ignore unconstitutional mandates by the illegitimate Biden regime. He talks, but not a lot of action.
    2
  50. False.
    2