General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
MrEkzotic
Fox News
comments
Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "Jack Smith is having a ‘temper tantrum’ over this: Leo Terrell" video.
Cannon should dismiss this case based on blatantly obvious selective prosecution.
9
Jack Smith better watch his mouth.
7
@The00Dude What law did he break? Oh, I know, being an outsider who beat Hillary in 2016. That was the crime.
3
@TimPoolWithoutTheBeanie Ok. Then so did Biden. Dismissed, selective prosecution.
3
@islandtime5643 LOL. No she hasn't.
2
@The00Dude But why do you think Trump is below the law?
2
@SocraticMutt The PRA is clearly relevant to this case. Just because Jack says so, that doesn't make it true. Notwithstanding any of those specifics, she has already questioned about how this is not selective prosecution. Any person with eyes, ears, and a functioning brain can see the difference between how Biden and Trump are being treated.
2
@SocraticMutt The PRA does not provide a pre-trial basis to dismiss, that doesn't mean it's not relevant to the case.
2
@TimPoolWithoutTheBeanie He stole them and then he returned them when he got caught. Yeah, that's not how it works. He stole them from a SCIF. Thanks for playing. 🤣
2
@user-cp9lz9pt8b That won't happen. Looks like you ran out of copium.
1
@SocraticMutt But Merchan and Engoron are completely objective. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡
1
@SocraticMutt Those instructions are proposed, they are not the final instructions. Even so, it tells me she sees what Jack is trying to do, and she's letting him know that she sees it.
1
@The00Dude Just because you refuse to look at the evidence, that doesn't mean it's not there. That's not how evidence works.
1
@TimPoolWithoutTheBeanie LOL. Not gonna happen. Be prepared to be let down. Remember how you felt when the Letitia couldn't put a padlock on Trump tower, multiply that feeling by a million when Trump wins.
1
@The00Dude He breaks the law over and over? Um, no he doesn't. Let me know when Biden is charged for his documents.
1
@SocraticMutt Fair enough. I was just clarifying that the PRA was not sufficient to grant a pretrial dismissal.
1
@SocraticMutt The PRA is relevant to the case...just not sufficient to grant a pretrial dismissal.
1
@The00Dude The problem for you is this, you have lied and lied and lied about Trump for the past 8 years. Now, even if Trump did break the law, you've cried wolf too many times. You will now never be believed. Now, any attempts to imprison Trump will be seen as wholly illegitimate and political, and that may ignite a sivle wohr.
1